Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

A claim of COP INFINITY or even COP>17 is not a claim of overunity? You are squirming in your hot seat. Everybody knows, and an internet search reveals, that you have claimed overunity performance many times. In the two quotations I have cited above you are claiming overunity performance. You can wave your hands about and talk about "circuit materials" somehow being converted to heat in the load and the mosfets without discharging the batteries. And I can talk about the snails and worms crawling between your ears and chewing on your brain, and we would both be talking about the same things and with the same validity. YOU HAVE DONE NO EXPERIMENTS TO VALIDATE YOUR "THESIS" CLAIMS which include this bizarre idea that the battery isn't responsible for your heat. And that's why the experts have uniformly rejected your papers, and that's why nobody-- despite your lies -- will come forward in support of them. NOT EVEN YOUR "collaborators", who as FTC points out have all jumped ship long ago.... because they all probably can DO THE MATH.

[TinselKoala]

Guys - TK needs to address some serious and slanderous allegations before he can expect any kind of engagement.  Had his 'attitude' been more politically and scientifically appropriate - then he'd have solicited co-operation.  We are not encouraged to engage with those who criminally slander our work and our names.  And we do not engage on a serious level with vigilantes.  And we will do our tests - NOT for the benefit of these vigilantes - but for the benefit of Open Source.  The distinction being that the former is destructive and utterly inappropriate.  The latter is required to protect these very desirable results for the public good.

Regards,
Rosemary

DO THE MATH, you lying cretin.

NOBODY expects any "serious engagement" from you, you have totally blown it bigtime in the last few days.

In fact  everybody in the Open Source research areas would benefit greatly if you would JUST GO AWAY because you are doing far more harm than good.

Well, some of them are probably happy that you are keeping me busy so that I can't debunk their buoyancy drives or centrifugal toolbox lifters.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

It seems that you are able to couple this zeal with an endless access to SPIN. 

A claim of COP INFINITY or even COP>17 is not a claim of overunity? You are squirming in your hot seat. Everybody knows, and an internet search reveals, that you have claimed overunity performance many times. In the two quotations I have cited above you are claiming overunity performance. You can wave your hands about and talk about "circuit materials" somehow being converted to heat in the load and the mosfets without discharging the batteries. And I can talk about the snails and worms crawling between your ears and chewing on your brain, and we would both be talking about the same things and with the same validity. YOU HAVE DONE NO EXPERIMENTS TO VALIDATE YOUR "THESIS" CLAIMS which include this bizarre idea that the battery isn't responsible for your heat. And that's why the experts have uniformly rejected your papers, and that's why nobody-- despite your lies -- will come forward in support of them. NOT EVEN YOUR "collaborators", who as FTC points out have all jumped ship long ago.... because they all probably can DO THE MATH.

COP INFINITY is MEASURED on our circuit using standard measurement protocols.  We claim that this is MEASURED.  We have done over 200 experiments ALL of which validate those MEASUREMENTS.  And we'll soon see if no-one comes forward with support - when the evidence of our tests will not only be unequivocal but they will support the evidence in our papers and they will be publicly demonstrated.

Rosie Pose

added.
And I actively dissuade any of my collaborators engaging here.  This thread is TOXIC.  It serves no purpose.  I only subscribe in as much as your 'spin' will otherwise not be addressed.  It's MUCH NEEDED.  But it only needs my input.  If it needed more I'd rethink this.

[TinselKoala]

They have been widely commended for their 'clarity' and this from professionals that include some highly respected names.  I'd disclose them if they wouldn't then be associated with this and my own threads littered as they all are with that reckless and criminal slander that you all indulge.  With all that vigilante zeal.

OK, then, how about just quoting the "commendations" themselves without revealing the "professionals" highly respected names.

YOU CANNOT. Go ahead, just make some "commendations" up, like you did for your alphabet companies who "endorsed" your earlier bogus claim of overunity performance. There are lots of professionals who HAVE read your "papers", though, and who have criticised them strongly, and who have chucked them into the circular file where they belong.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

TK

DO THE MATH, you lying cretin.

NOBODY expects any "serious engagement" from you, you have totally blown it bigtime in the last few days.

In fact  everybody in the Open Source research areas would benefit greatly if you would JUST GO AWAY because you are doing far more harm than good.

Well, some of them are probably happy that you are keeping me busy so that I can't debunk their buoyancy drives or centrifugal toolbox lifters.

I've said this before.  You do an invaluable job of advertising our work.  It's much appreciated.

Rosie Pose