Testing the TK Tar Baby

[Groundloop]

Groundloop - just to caution you.  IF you apply a continual positive to the Gate of Q1 then you will ONLY get a DC outflow.  Do you really mean that?  And does TK REALLY expect you to do that?  I'm not sure why you'd want to prove this.  It has no bearing on the issue.  But far be it from me to interfere with your test objects.
Regards as ever,
Rosie

Rosemary,

It will be the same as setting my function generator to 10 second on and 10 second off,
and measuring over the RSHUNT with a voltmeter during the 10 second on period.

It will show what is happening during the ON pulse from the FG because at the ON pulse
there is NO oscillation and the mosfet is just conducting current in a DC mode.

And, it is a very relevant test to dertermine what the current is through the RSHUNT when
the FG is in the positive pulse.

And, it is relevant to show you that your measuremnets over the RSHUNT is right or wrong.

GL.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Groundloop - the plot thickens.

It will be the same as setting my function generator to 10 second on and 10 second off, and measuring over the RSHUNT with a voltmeter during the 10 second on period.

It will show what is happening during the ON pulse from the FG because at the ON pulse there is NO oscillation and the mosfet is just conducting current in a DC mode.

And, it is a very relevant test to dertermine what the current is through the RSHUNT when the FG is in the positive pulse.

And, it is relevant to show you that your measuremnets over the RSHUNT is right or wrong.

Exactly WHICH MOSFET measurement are you referring to?  Which scope shot?  Which measurement?

Regards,
Rosemary

[Rosemary Ainslie]

LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE POLLY PARROT LIES AGAIN ho hohooo you are so silly and transparent.

Guys, it seems that our TK is not only short in stature, short on courtesy, short on professionalism - but he's also somewhat short on emotional maturity.  From this reference I take it we're dealing with 3 year old.  And this the kind of post that our Harti prefers?  For some reason?  Very strange. 

Linky please... you cannot support your contention here with a citation or a quote, because once again you are referring to your own hallucination. 320 mA times 62 volts is what again? YES, I do unequivocally "claim" or rather calculate from your data that the instantaneous power during the ON state is 20 Watts, roughly. And WHERE did I say it was dissipated?  And do I believe that you obtained that temperature under the conditions of that scope trace? No, I do not, and in fact I deny that it is even possible, much less have I ever claimed that it was "sufficient", you hallucinating liar you.

At least he's acknowledging that he claimed 20 watts instantaneous power.  What utter NONSENSE. 

Regards,
Rosemary

[MileHigh]

Rosemary:

There was never any issue with the instantaneous power vs. the average power.  The whole combative debate was crazy.  It was a "yellow" debate, manufactured nonsense from the get-go.  What possesses you to do this?  What in God's name is going on with you?

You talk about trolls all the time.  You are acting like the ultimate troll, combative endless arguments that serve no purpose and make no sense.

People are indeed getting frustrated and losing their cool.  If you want to pretend that you have "scored a victory" in this "debate" because you are still harping on about average power, bla bla bla, then you are sorely mistaken.

There is nothing to disagree about with respect to the power.  However, you claimed that there was insignificant power when the gate signal was +5 volts and that was clearly wrong.  There were 20 watts being dissipated, and most of that power was being dissipated in the MOSFET itself.  That simple basic analysis was never understood or done when you ran the NERD tests.  In addition, that should be an embarrassment to yourself and the NERD team because your objective was to show power being dissipated in the load resistor, not in the MOSFETs.

You need to get a grip on the reality of your situation and who you are talking to here.

How about your dim bulb testing?  When are you going to buy new and smaller batteries?  What is your proposed protocol?  When do you plan on doing the testing?

MileHigh

[WilbyInebriated]

bullying
bullying ranges from simple one-on-one bullying to more complex bullying in which the bully may have one or more 'lieutenants' who may seem to be willing to assist the primary bully in his or her bullying activities.

bullying behavior may include name calling, verbal or written abuse, exclusion from activities, exclusion from social situations, physical abuse, or coercion. bullies may behave this way to be perceived as popular or tough or to get attention. they may bully out of jealousy or be acting out because they themselves are bullied.

social aggression or indirect bullying is characterized by attempting to socially isolate the victim. this isolation is achieved through a wide variety of techniques, including spreading gossip, refusing to socialize with the victim, bullying other people who wish to socialize with the victim, and criticizing the victim's manner of dress and other socially-significant markers (including the victim's race, religion, disability, sex, or sexual preference, etc.). other forms of indirect bullying which are more subtle and more likely to be verbal, such as name calling, the silent treatment, arguing others into submission, manipulation, gossip/false gossip, lies, rumors/false rumors, staring, giggling, laughing at the victim, saying certain words that trigger a reaction from a past event, and mocking.