Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

Look, she lies with every post she makes, still.

HIDE my results? I beg your pardon? Every single thing I've done is right here in this thread or in my YT channel videos and comments. Spreadsheets, scopeshots, circuit diagrams, mistakes, victories, all of it. I'm hiding nothing.

There is certainly HIDING of results happening... but not by me. It is AINSLIE who is hiding results, hiding coworkers, hiding original data, hiding corrections to the ridiculous math.... hiding the TRUTH, seeking even to censor truth from others.

And I guess it's beyond her comprehension that Altoid DOES NO LONGER EVEN USE A BATTERY OF ANY KIND. But sure, I've got some rechargeable 9v batteries.

How about this: I'll run Altoid on 1) a regular 9v battery; 2) a rechargeable 9v battery; 3) the 2 F capacitor that I am using lately; and 4) a regulated power supply. I'll photograph scope shots for the 4 different conditions ... and anyone who wants to play can try to match up the shots with the power supply used.

Meanwhile.... will Ainslie be doing a Dim Bulb test, or any battery rundown tests?  Of course not. She will only show just what she's always shown: a negative mean power product. Will she boil a liter of water using oscillations alone, with NO positive gate signal? No, she will not. Will she refute any of my videos, for example the Function Generator Passing Current From its "Probe" to its "Ground"? No... she cannot. Will she put 72 volts and 5 amps through the lone Q1 mosfet without it getting warm, as she claims? Not in a million years.

[TinselKoala]

Um.... DO THE MATH. Is the conclusion True... or not true?

The basis for Ainslie's claims of overunity and battery non-discharge are based on multiple examples of similar ABSURD calculations, all of which are badly in error and none of which _actually_ support her claims.

Spin on that.

A 60 amp-hour, 12 volt battery contains 60 amps x 12 volts x 1 hour x 60 seconds per minute x 60 minutes per hour = 2592000 Joules and six of them therefore contain 15,552,000 Joules. You left out an entire factor of sixty, because you do not respect units nor do you understand what you are doing with your blind multiplications, Ainslie.

Ainslie's test used 54 hours at 10 Watts, she says, which is 10 Watts x 60 seconds per minute x 60 minutes per hour x 54 hours or 1,944,000 JOULES, Ainslie, not Watts. The quantity is Joules, dissipated at a RATE of ten watts, for a time period of 54 hours. You got the number right but you STILL don't understand the difference between the quantity of energy (the JOULE)  and the rate per second that energy is dissipated: the WATT.

And the fully charged battery pack has 15,552,000 Joules in it. So you have not even come slightly close to reaching anywhere near the neighborhood of the battery's capacity, much less exceeded it. 15.5/1.9 = a little over EIGHT. So you could have done EIGHT such tests before your batteries showed a real loss of voltage.

Have fun on your new blog, Ainslie. You will be repeating history for the what, eighth time now? But this time.... an entire database exists containing your lies, prevarications, bad math, threats, insults, and ridiculous claims, all in one place ... actually several places now.... that anyone can download and read for themselves to see just what you really are.

[TinselKoala]

@MH: I can't even imagine an eight-core processor!
What is the main purpose of that computer? Is it a gamer? What kind of graphics card does it use again?
I don't game, but I do have RealFlight which is a really neat model airplane and helicopter simulator with real model airplanes modelled in it.... I have a few of the actual models and they do fly just like the sim! (Only they are much more expensive to crash.)  It needs lots of graphics power to run in full resolution scenery, full flight physics, helicopter acro mode. I'll bet your beast would run it in a window, while running four other games at the same time.

[hartiberlin]

Wilby, stopy posting private addresses of users, also if they could be found by a google search... !

Last warning, otherwise you will get moderated...

And please stop posting here on this thread as you don´t add any useful technical info !

It is time for Ainsley now to make new experiments...and prove her fact,
not the other way around...

TK has shown many tests of this circuit and has basically done the work, what Ainsley should have done
by herself or her team...

Regards, Stefan.

[WilbyInebriated]

Wilby, stopy posting private addresses of users, also if they could be found by a google search... !

it's PUBLIC INFORMATION!!!... idiot.

Last warning, otherwise you will get moderated...

last warning? you never gave me a first warning... you removed my informative posts that refuted glen and tk ASININE insinuations about rosemary's forum WITHOUT REASON OR NOTICE... again, tu stultus es...

And please stop posting here on this thread as you don´t add any useful technical info !

until you apply that to everyone one this forum WITHOUT BIAS, i'll post what i please where i please.

regards...