Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

Don't try and advise me how to find my way around a computer.  Little  TK.  I do PRECISELY what is required.  I suggest that my method of coping with myopia is best settled by me.  They're my eyes - after all.

Rosie Pose

I suggest that you are an incompetent fool, blindered by your own arrogance. Not only that... I PROVE IT. Or rather, I allow you to prove it, over and over again.

[picowatt]

My dear picowatt

How I know that you're an utterly incompetent and rather reckless contributor to this and any thread at all - is because you're claiming something that we are well able to DISPROVE.  And we shall do so.  I am looking forward to the certain destruction of your gross misrepresentations especially as they relate to your claimed competence to comment on any level  at all.

Rosie Pose

There is no way that while using the same DC coupled 'scope settings and identical gate drive waveforms, that a functioning Q1 can be connected as per the schematic and not show significant current flow via the CSR.  Can't be done.  No one can do it.  Not possible.  You should be considering how you are going to deal with this very real issue, instead of arguing that it does not exist.

Applying +12 volts to the gate of Q1 MUST turn it on unless Q1 is defective or not connected as per your schematic.

So keep up with the insults, your skills at doing so are way better than mine, you are indeed an expert at that.

But, it will not change the facts in evidence.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

ACTUALLY, Little Miss Mosfet, you bloviating incompetent, he could have it this afternoon FOR COMPLETELY FREE if you honestly were interested in giving it to him. And those videos that I post and that .99 linked ARE NOT UPLOADED TO THIS FORUM.... they are YouTube links, and if you can't view them it is again due only to your ignorance, not some strange plot against you by evil computer hackers.

My dear little TK. 

Every time I think that you've gone as low as is possible - you surprise me with yet a new bench mark.  Amazing.  A troll with an infinite lack of common decency and an equally ENORMOUS lack of any conscience at all.  It beggars the mind.  Both the extent of that lack and the fact these these boundless reaches are measuring nothing.  It seems that our little technology is exposing negative properties in the vacuum - all over the place.

Not sure what new 'interference' has taken place.  But I'm absolutely NOT able to open any links to any videos at all.   Not that I mind.  The good news is that I'm spared the task of ever looking at your 'so called' work.  LOL.  Always small mercies.

Rosie Pose

[Rosemary Ainslie]

There is no way that while using the same DC coupled 'scope settings and identical gate drive waveforms, that a functioning Q1 can be connected as per the schematic and not show significant current flow via the CSR.  Can't be done.  No one can do it.  Not possible.  You should be considering how you are going to deal with this very real issue, instead of arguing that it does not exist.

Applying +12 volts to the gate of Q1 MUST turn it on unless Q1 is defective or not connected as per your schematic.

So keep up with the insults, your skills at doing so are way better than mine, you are indeed an expert at that.

But, it will not change the facts in evidence.

It most certainly WILL.  I promise you that.  On all that I hold holy.  We've already got those screenshots downloaded.  Now I've got to show you the difference in the chosen coupling.

Rosie Pose

[picowatt]

It most certainly WILL.  I promise you that.  On all that I hold holy.  We've already got those screenshots downloaded.  Now I've got to show you the difference in the chosen coupling.

Rosie Pose

Read my post more slowly, of cousrs the values will "look" different in AC coupling, and as well, they will be totally meaningless.  You would know this if you understood AC/DC coupling.  Possibly you do know this and plan to show us all some wonderful AC coupled FG waveforms wherein the positive peak of the FG trace has drifted closer to the zero ref.  That, of course, would be outright fraud and an attempt to cover-up data. (Which anyone with even modest 'scope skills will see right thru) 

The FIG3 screen capture cannot be duplicated with identical 'scope settings (DC coupled!) and an identical FG waveform with a functioning Q1 connected as per your schematic.

This new tack of yours does not change the facts in evidence.

In FIG3, during the portion of the FG cycle wherein the FG output is a positive voltage, approx. +12 volts is indicated as being applied to the gate of Q1. All will surely agree that +12 volts applied to the gate of Q1 is more than sufficient to turn Q1 fully on.   The CSR trace however, during this same portion of the cycle, indicates no significant current as would be expected if Q1 were turned on.

As well, FIG7 indicates sufficient gate drive to turn on Q1, and again, no significant current flow is indicated by the CSR trace.

Q1 must, therefore, be defective or not connected as per the schematic in the tests those figures represent.

There is no arguing these points.  All the data required to support these facts are readily available in your schematic and 'scope captures.