Testing the TK Tar Baby

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi Guys,

Just a quick word.  There is no way under God's sun that we or anyone can generate any version of the required oscillation without the use of a feedback diode of some sort.  Our very early versions of this switch used nothing more than a relay with a diode across the switch.  Our best results were when we simply accessed the internal body diode of the transistors used.  And neither I nor any of our collaborators have stipulated that ONLY the IRFPG50 is required.

It is this kind of SPIN that utterly disqualifies TK from presuming to comment on any of our work AT ALL.  He is FRAUDULENTLY misrepresenting this and this FRAUD is compounded in his CLAIMED 'compendium' as representative of that work.  We entirely disassociate ourselves from it.  I have also now stopped any further notification of posts in this thread.  Hopefully - in due course I'll stop looking in here let alone comment here.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

And for those of you who want to evaluate this technology outside of this 'self appointed' commentary by TK - with all its spin and nonsense - then here's the address.  You'll be able to enjoy a forum that is not groaning under calumny - misrepresentation and slander - as well as EDITORIAL BIAS.  LOL.

http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/

[TinselKoala]

Hi Guys,

Just a quick word.  There is no way under God's sun that we or anyone can generate any version of the required oscillation without the use of a feedback diode of some sort.  Our very early versions of this switch used nothing more than a relay with a diode across the switch.  Our best results were when we simply accessed the internal body diode of the transistors used.  And neither I nor any of our collaborators have stipulated that ONLY the IRFPG50 is required.

It is this kind of SPIN that utterly disqualifies TK from presuming to comment on any of our work AT ALL.  He is FRAUDULENTLY misrepresenting this and this FRAUD is compounded in his CLAIMED 'compendium' as representative of that work.  We entirely disassociate ourselves from it.  I have also now stopped any further notification of posts in this thread.  Hopefully - in due course I'll stop looking in here let alone comment here.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

And for those of you who want to evaluate this technology outside of this 'self appointed' commentary by TK - with all its spin and nonsense - then here's the address.  You'll be able to enjoy a forum that is not groaning under calumny - misrepresentation and slander - as well as EDITORIAL BIAS.  LOL.

http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/

Now you are getting yourself in real trouble, Ainslie. Accusing me of FRAUD or FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATION of anything is not only a BALDFACED LIE but it is also, as you so like to say,  ACTIONABLE.

Perhaps you'd like to look up a legal definition of FRAUD, and also SLANDER AND LIBEL.

For your great information, Ainslie you lying arrogant ignorant hypocrite, the majority of my Ainslie Database contains YOUR OWN WORDS AND DATA. There is no way that simply quoting and reproducing YOUR FORUM POSTS AND DATA constitutes any kind of "fraud"... what it does is to illustrate the FRAUD YOU HAVE ATTEMPTED TO PERPETRATE by your attempts to claim monetary prizes for your unsupported claims.

IN FACT, Ainslie, you are STILL making many fraudulent claims in YOUR ONLY "OFFICIAL PUBLICATION". The one you LIED ABOUT RETRACTING.

HERE IS THE PROOF, yet again, IMAGE TAKEN JUST NOW, of AINSLIE's FRAUDULENT CLAIM with which she has sought to obtain at least THREE monetary prizes.


Now, Ainslie, you choose to accuse me of FRAUD without a single shred of evidence or references of any kind. BE QUITE SURE to show these posts to your imaginary lawyers. Perhaps they can educate you, although since you know everything already, that is unlikely.


HERE IS THE PROOF.

Hopefully, in due course, Ainslie will dry up and blow away, since her lying claims have crumbled into dust already.

[TinselKoala]

Hi Guys,

Just a quick word.  There is no way under God's sun that we or anyone can generate any version of the required oscillation without the use of a feedback diode of some sort.

And of course when somebody DOES make the "required oscillations" with a mosfet or other transistor that does NOT have the body diode or any other diode... Ainslie will simply say "those aren't the required oscillations".

Ainslie, your magic oscillations are simple feedback oscillations, just as they are in my Class E sstc. The mosfet's internal body diode is unimportant except to protect the mosfet and the zeners are just there for voltage regulation. NO DIODES ARE NEEDED to make your "required oscillations", not even the internal body diode of the mosfet. Any transistor can do essentially the same thing, INCLUDING making your magical meaningless mismeasured "negative mean power".

[TinselKoala]

  And neither I nor any of our collaborators have stipulated that ONLY the IRFPG50 is required.

It is this kind of SPIN that utterly disqualifies TK from presuming to comment on any of our work AT ALL.

Um.... let's see... I have been profoundly criticised by you and your sock puppets in the past for NOT using the IRFPG50... remember how astonished you were when I reproduced your results using IRF830a, a dollar and a half mosfet? Remember Wilby harping on me for YEARS for using a 2sk1548 instead of a PG50 for a few days in my work on your earlier circuit?
And just who is it that is using a single 2n7000 transistor RIGHT NOW to make your negative mean power product and a negative energy integral FOR ANYONE ON DEMAND USING NO BATTERY AT ALL?
You are accusing me of "spinning" something that you are desperately trying to spin in your favor, when everyone knows that you have insisted that the mosfet used have the same high voltage and internal diode and other features of the IRFPG50. You have never shown the use of any other mosfet, I HAVE. You have never compared the performance of different mosfets in your circuit. I HAVE. So spin on this, you arrogant ignorant spinning liar.

On the contrary, I am more qualified to comment on your work than YOU are. So are Picowatt, .99, MileHigh, FuzzyTomCat, humbugger, and even Stefan Hartmann. You, on the other hand, don't understand your "work" or your circuit at all.

You don't even know how to do the calculations! You don't even know how to clean up your own messes, like all the different versions of your manuscripts that contain conflicting schematics, false claims and outright lies, like "bringing water to boil" when you did no such thing, and your 5.9 megaJoules joke.

And you've tried to suppress your own data. Shame on you, you lying hypocrite.

[TinselKoala]

A couple of corona flowers, from ClassE at about 120 Watts input (35 V, 3.5 A).

Interestingly, the component that heats up the most is the secondary resonator ! It runs at around 150 degrees F during prolonged corona displays at 120W input. And it's relatively large, and is hanging in the ambient air circulation. The mosfet doesn't heat much if it's kept in that good Class E switching mode; the fan is there because there is that other mode where there is a lot of noise and in that mode there is a lot of heat in the mosfet.

So... if you include the heating of the secondary coil, the RF power in the near and far fields, and the 10+ kV corona display..... well, let's just say it's a _lot_ of apparent power out, for not much real power in.