Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

You cannot even parody Polly Parrot. She is her own parody.

See... she really meant 4 AMPS DC  from the 8 volts peak to peak measured across the shunt.


For her next edit, Polly Parrot will finally replace the "DC" with AC.... even though she has no understanding even of those simple distinctions, or she would never have made the howling errors in the first place.

[WilbyInebriated]

even though she has no understanding even of those simple distinctions, or she would never have made the howling errors in the first place.

similar to you and your use of the words; replication, exactly, etc. etc.   

interesting that you can use 'howlers' at your whim and pleasure but anyone else does, that's grounds for an immediate spanking by the koala in the tinsel hat...

carry on you sad little man...

[picowatt]

If she is able to replicate FIG 3 with the SAME 'scope settings and a functional Q1, I suggest she check the wiring and connections for Q1.

The FIG 3 'scope capture cannot be replicated with a functioning Q1 connected as per the schematic.

Period....

[TinselKoala]

Hey .99... why don't you ask Ainslie to explain how to test a FET. I'd love to hear her explain.

And remember... there have been at least FIVE different schematics claimed to be used for the data in the manuscripts and the scopeshots in question:

1) The single mosfet schematic with a series gate resistor and no "black" lead FG hookup shown, shown clearly in the demo video;
2) The "five mosfets in parallel" claimed by the narrator of the video simultaneously while showing the above diagram;
3) The actual wiring that you determined from looking at the video carefully, and which shows the FG Black lead hooked to the common circuit ground bus;
4) The schematic presented in the first Ainslie manuscript, which accurately shows the mosfet wiring but misrepresents the placement of the Black FG lead as being on the transistor side of the shunt... which is the correct location but which was NOT used for the paper, actually... it couldn't have been, she didn't know that was the right place for it until the analyses subsequent to the experimental trials.
5) And the schematic presented in the "paper" most recently posted on Rossi's JNP which has the same FG Black lead location but has the Q2x4 stack on the right side instead of the left side, where the RED FG lead is connected to the gate NOT of the lone mosfet Q1 as in the first paper and the demonstration, but to the gates of the Gang of Four Q2s.

Recall also that she deliberately concealed the true schematic-- or claimed to, perhaps she didn't know about the mistake until you found it -- at any rate a deliberate deception was perpetrated by her concerning the wiring of the demonstration apparatus.


So for anything coming from Ainslie, I think you need to see actual photographs, clear and focused, of both sides of the apparatus so you can know how it's wired.

Now... .how does someone who thinks 0.8 is one eighth... who thinks that the capacitances of a group of mosfets can't possibly "enable" 8 amps of "dc" peak to peak current (sic!)... who thinks that 1 Watt = 1 Joule ... who asks you and everybody else to believe that she dissipated 5.9 megaJoules in  96 minutes without getting...er... uncomfortably warm....

How exactly does this person test 5 FETs for functionality and integrity?


Does she perhaps put them into the circuits that are shown in the data sheet for the mosfet and monitor the behaviour of those circuits? I laugh out loud.
Perhaps she uses the "transistor check" H_fe function on a DMM. I laugh even louder.

[The Boss]

Now that's a really nice forum she has there.

Not too difficult to envision her sitting there on her own deserted island of shifting delusions
with no one to talk to but herself, waiting for someone ..anyone, to please post something ..anything.

Time for her to PM as many people as she can, to at least leave a comment.
.