Testing the TK Tar Baby

[Magluvin]

Oh yeah he had the MIB story of them taking his motor for some days the "giving it back to him' saying, "heres your toy"  lol, that guy. 

Mags

[powercat]

Question: Why are you guys NOT attacking every other OU endeavor  presented on the many forums here on overunity.com?

Oh ... and YES, those delusional energy waves given off by my circuit are quite addicting. That's why I enjoy working on it so much.

Regards

The free energy community has enough problems trying to maintain its credibility,
and the false claims.....misleading information and scamers must be exposed,
luckily most of the other threads on this forum are doing good research
without making claims they can't prove.

[gmeast]

"That's news, that Ainslie isn't [color=rgb(0, 0, 255) !important]sharing[/color] with you. It sounded like she intended to."


Your assumptions speak only to your arrogance and stupidity.  Rosie has told me a number of times privately that she does NOT care if I choose NOT to associate her name with my investigation.  In fact she said it's probably better if I DON'T because of self righteous people like you.

I am NOT out to prove that HER circuit works, because I haven't built HER circuit.  I am out to investigate the possibilities that an Inductive Heater and related Circuit(s) can possibly display COP>1 behavior.  That's all I'm doing you arrogant, presumptive, venomous TWIT!


If you're accusing me of "fakery", then others will eventually see you and your accomplices for who you are.  I feel so sorry for you that you harbor so much hatred for one person that you attack ANYONE that so much as utters that person's name.  You have such a small, pitiable, narrow mind.


I hope I see you at the symposium.

Regards

[mrsean2k]

@gmeast


What's your purpose in that reply?


As far as I can see, nobody has accused you of fakery. Can you provide a quote for exactly where you believe that's happened? Quite the reverse, there's a conciliatory tone in most of the recent posts, at least from this side of the fence. But you seem hellbent on provoking an aggressive response for no good reason.


You see every attempt to point out areas where your testing protocol can be improved as a personal attack, and it would be baffling to watch, had it not been for the fact that we've seen this sort of thing from Rosemary herself so many times. Almost without exception, attempts to correct her misapprehensions and mistakes, no matter how patiently and politely they are pointed out at first, are characterised as "attacks".

[TinselKoala]

Hey, GMEAST, you insulting whining asshole idiot lying fool...... TELL THE TRUTH. You aren't building or researching AINSLIE's circuit because FROM THE VERY FIRST you rejected the present NERD circuit as nonsensical and of no possibility for working as she claimed, AND when you started to research AINSLIE's earlier COP>17 circuit claims, FROM THE VERY FIRST you found that the 555 timer didn't work and that other elements of the circuit were problematic... thus you began using gate driver chips.

In other words, GMEAST, you started this affair by rejecting one Ainslie circuit, attempting to replicate another and failing, and now you are whining because you aren't getting fantastic results Ainslie reported and you expected. IN OTHER WORDS, you have been suckered by Ainslie and you choose to express your resentment here instead of to her, where it should be directed, since she lied to you about what her circuits did and could do.

And also recall, you overweeningly arrogant Ainslie sycophant and insulting idiot, that nobody insulted YOU PERSONALLY until YOU STARTED INSULTING ME PERSONALLY.

Now, fuck off, GMEAST, and play with your silly toys until you tire of it. It's your time to waste. Can you do it without BEING SO FUCKING INSULTING, and with a little respect for people who have ALREADY DONE what you are doing now?

Somehow I doubt it.