Testing the TK Tar Baby

[Magluvin]

Very cool. Same here just about. Yours looks like maybe a better build. Very nice and neat on the armature. Is that a fan motor?  This thing is so torquey. ;]  I see the casing is the magnet field return. Like it would not work so well if the casing were plastic.
Mine had 2 welds next to the mounting holes which I drilled. The mounting holes provide a good alignment to put it back together. Had a bit of white silicone as a case seal.

Was thinking to try mags on each sector on each side of the rotor then making my own U shaped paths for each pair, and make a casing out of plexi.

Honestly I have been looking at it for 2 days and I dont understand it. lol  The brush positions are at near 12 oclock and 2. I wonder if it is to make up for the missing portions of the magnet? And the winding angles, a wire goes outward at an angle then bends at the edge and comes back in at the same angle if you were looking at that side of the plate. So maybe the 12 and 2 positions of the brushes mean that there are only some of the windings active at any certain time. Not like a typical DC motor where all coils are active at all times. Constant torque. But these seem to be constant and torquey too. 

Thats interesting that not all the windings are in series but separate. I thinks. Im going to test it after this. Just thought about all this while posting here.

Remember the homopolar motor thread I described using wires outward to replace the copper disk? This reminds me of that a bit. ;]

Mags

[Magluvin]

I can see what you say about no cog. Theres no core in the armature. 

Mags

[Magluvin]

Hmm. If we were to lock up the rotor to the motor casing, connect an led to the input wires then spin the motor as a whole, would the led light? Like the N machine. It has the ingredients I think. Still checking out the rotor connections.

Mags

[gmeast]

Battery voltages, time, and.... TEMPERATURE. It is your measurements of temperature vs time and your interpretation of them that are now at issue, since you are choosing to ignore other electrical parameters. That's fine as long as you do proper calorimetry, which you are not yet doing.

Determining the actual wattage your load dissipates using time-temperature profiles can be done accurately with a bit more effort than your simple setup, and you've been told how to do it, and you can find essentially the same methods as we suggest, in other sources for amateur scientists and academic research as well.

And ... of course TEMPERATURE ... you idiot. There's nothing wrong with my interpretation of anything with regards to these tests.  Other electrical parameters are irrelevant.  Calorimetry is irrelevant. You simply are going to refuse to accept any evidence at all that just might provide some validity for this technology. 


I'm presently discussing these results with some seasoned researchers.  My initial visits opened my eyes to the realization that real scientists and researchers don't talk, act or react like you do. You are completely devoid of any of the professional qualities that define true scientists and researchers. You are a fraud.


Tell me, because I really don't know, was this thread started for the sole purpose of disproving and discrediting Rosie's research? 

[Magluvin]

Tell me, because I really don't know, was this thread started for the sole purpose of disproving and discrediting Rosie's research?

This threads beginning is way past disproving of Roses claims.  This thread has discovered and 'shown' characteristics and details of functions, cause and effect, way beyond what Rose even 'claims' she knows. Yet she has zippons draining her batteries and is telling everyone the batteries are charging. Ive been looking for a good zippon detector. Maybe you can tell me where she got hers.     Can ya do that for me Zippy?

Mags