Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

Now that Ainslie has reactivated and renamed her YouTube account, using her "Rosemary Ainslie" alias instead of Maria Krebs... for obvious reasons..... I expect her to remove the famous video that "she did not post" at any time. She constantly claims... lately.... that it doesn't "represent" her claims but only "relates" to them..... whatever that means in Ainslie-speak. She will no doubt remove it since it clearly contains many lies, misrepresentations and the "smoking gun".... or perhaps I should say "smoking mosfet"... of the battery that wasn't there: the removal of one battery, leaving only 4 at a nominal 48 volts input, for the High Heat part of the demonstration. This was done, of course, to prevent having the Q1 mosfet fail in public. Yet Ainslie presents the scopeshot I reproduced above as an example: 72 volts input, 12 volts to the gate.... long on-times..... and ZERO CURRENT, proving the mosfet is blown.

Five different claimed schematics for the video: 1) the single mosfet schematic shown in the video; 2) the narrator saying that all five mosfets are in parallel; 3) and 4) the two different "published" schematics showing the mosfets switched left for right, making a MAJOR change in the circuit's heat and current handling capacity; and 5) the TRUE  schematic derived from the video stills, showing the FG black lead in a different place than in the "official" published schematics 3 and 4.

So she'll probably be taking down that mendacious video which does more to prove her as a liar than it does to support her "thesis".

Nevertheless.... I have a copy.

http://www.youtube.com/user/dooziedont

[TinselKoala]

When is Ainslie going to address any of the many points I've made? The discrepancies in the data and the descriptions, the bad calculations, the crazy muddling of terms and quantities, the misrepresentations... the outright LIES like I've shown her committing time and time again as above?

Never, that's when. She cannot, without admitting that she has been wrong, entirely and utterly, for many years of her life, about her ridiculous obsession.

Still, you'd think that she would at least be too embarrassed to continue lying. But she isn't! The woman has no conscience at all. She blithely lies left and right, and when she's caught out.... like above.... she just carries on and never mentions it further, not to apologise, not to correct her lying statements..... but she WILL try to go back and edit them away if she can. Hence..... the screenshots, rather than simple quotations.

[TinselKoala]

 


http://www.networksolutions.com/whois/index.jsp

[fuzzytomcat]

Now that Ainslie has reactivated and renamed her YouTube account, using her "Rosemary Ainslie" alias instead of Maria Krebs... for obvious reasons..... I expect her to remove the famous video that "she did not post" at any time. She constantly claims... lately.... that it doesn't "represent" her claims but only "relates" to them..... whatever that means in Ainslie-speak. She will no doubt remove it since it clearly contains many lies, misrepresentations and the "smoking gun".... or perhaps I should say "smoking mosfet"... of the battery that wasn't there: the removal of one battery, leaving only 4 at a nominal 48 volts input, for the High Heat part of the demonstration. This was done, of course, to prevent having the Q1 mosfet fail in public. Yet Ainslie presents the scopeshot I reproduced above as an example: 72 volts input, 12 volts to the gate.... long on-times..... and ZERO CURRENT, proving the mosfet is blown.

Five different claimed schematics for the video: 1) the single mosfet schematic shown in the video; 2) the narrator saying that all five mosfets are in parallel; 3) and 4) the two different "published" schematics showing the mosfets switched left for right, making a MAJOR change in the circuit's heat and current handling capacity; and 5) the TRUE  schematic derived from the video stills, showing the FG black lead in a different place than in the "official" published schematics 3 and 4.

So she'll probably be taking down that mendacious video which does more to prove her as a liar than it does to support her "thesis".

Nevertheless.... I have a copy.

http://www.youtube.com/user/dooziedont

Hey TK,

Don't forget the top billed clan member Evan Robinson who's name appears on both document transcripts that the tribe leader Rosemary submitted for peer review to possibly be published in accredited journals or magazines on her experimental device with a operating claim of COP>INFINITY. I also highlighted the attached image with the magic mosfets IRFPG50 "in parallel" which also shows the incorrect wiring diagram that was used in the demonstration video "Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration 12 March 2011" and later several additional connection diagrams all now under question.

As you also noted "NOTHING" that was published by Rosemary Ainslie and her NERD RAT team, has been revised or removed because from the total lack of accuracy on any and all the subject matter that was shown for this magical COP>INFINITY device.   

http://mygeni.org/view/weblink.mygeni?wid=1590&back=view%2Fuser.mygeni%3Fid%3D2%26ig%3D923 
http://mygeni.org/view/video.mygeni?vid=407&back=view%2Fuser.mygeni%3Fid%3D2%26ig%3D923   

[TinselKoala]

Once again Ainslie proves her mendacity with her own words. I can only shake my head in amazement. How can one person be so very stupid? She has enough stupidity for three or four normal people.

I'd love to be a fly on the wall when Ainslie tries to explain this scopeshot  to Mark Dansie. Ainslie is so ignorant of her topic that she can't even see or understand what is wrong with this shot, much less explain it.... or reproduce it, with intact mosfets and the claimed schematic.