quentron.com

[profitis]

uh-huh so you dont think its incorrect to ask for evidence of kelvins statement then.now that thats cleared can you provide it in this case then please @sarkeizen

[sarkeizen]

uh-huh so you dont think its incorrect to ask for evidence of kelvins statement then.now that thats cleared can you provide it in this case then please @sarkeizen

You need to re-think how "no" is used in English.  As I said earlier.  Your other point etc.. isn't something I'm interested in talking about until you clarify your point concerning textbooks necessitating eternal batteries.

As far as I see you've already admitted that this other point (whatever it is) is either irrelevant, weaker than your textbook or invalidates your textbook point.  Not to mention that it appears to be an argument from ignorance.

Come back when you're not being stupid.

[profitis]

lol! @englishmaster- sarkeizen.this discussion has become a joke man.im asking you to prevent a textbook device from being branded perpetual motion and youre asking me to unprevent it from being branded perpetual motion.dont you think that the righteous deed is now on you to defend kelvins statement?for the sake of showing me up as incorrect (as you claim)at least?then you can show me up as the liar you claim me to be.catch me out @sarkeizen coz my ego is growing fast here by the minute and i dont like it when my ego gets ahead of me.

[sarkeizen]

lol! @englishmaster- sarkeizen.this discussion has become a joke man.

Yes, you made it a joke by being an EOA.

im asking you to prevent a textbook device from being branded perpetual motion

Sorry.  Don't care.  You were the one who made the statement about eternal batteries.  Which I cornered you on in two posts and you spent months backing away from.

and youre asking me to unprevent it from being branded perpetual motion

No I'm not.  I've asked you to defend a statement which you claimed was true and implied easy to demonstrate.  You have spent months avoiding answering some of the most simple and obvious questions and attempting to distract with other questions that are either vague to the point of being useless, irrelevant or invalidate your own point.

then you can show me up as the liar you claim me to be

Dude.  You have admitted to being a liar, twice.  I don't think I need to do any more work here.

.catch me out @sarkeizen coz my ego is growing fast here by the minute and i dont like it when my ego gets ahead of me.

I'm pretty sure I don't care.  Be as stupid as you want troll-boy.

[profitis]

you really truly are sillier than i thought you were @sarkeizen.power,my friend,in science,lies in the ability to demonstrate something,regardless of what any book says.thats why i keep pushing you with my demonstrate rhetoric i.e. to pivot my point ruthlessly to the public,who are the ones which count here at the end of the day.in other words you can use wikipedia to tell you how to build a magical unicorn if your smart enough,let alone an self-repeating battery,and nobody would give a dam,especially you.