quentron.com

[profitis]

lol.im pulling your leg @sarkeizen,lighten up.i dont know what edition my sienko-n-plane is but i dont know if i should apologize because your statement that theres no nernst subtitle is highly suspect,possibly corrupt,seeing that it covers electrochemistry.btw i dont see how your inability to show kelvin statement in a stated cell in wikipedia,amongst other encyclopedias is in any way ignorant or null and void and i believe its in your best interests as lawyer(for your client,lord kelvin) to put this issue straight right now before the jury goes in for deliberation. 

[sarkeizen]

lol.im pulling your leg @sarkeizen,lighten up.

So now you know you're caught and admit to lying...again this time it's the "just joking excuse". 

i dont know if i should apologize

So let me get this straight.  You deliberately gave a cite which could not possibly be found and your plan was designed to *only* disadvantage honest people....and somehow you think there's some ethical high-ground left for you? Riiiiiiight

i dont see how your inability to show kelvin statement in a stated cell in wikipedia,amongst other encyclopedias is in any way ignorant

Have you considered the possibility that you are stupid?     You should.  Your point concerns textbooks containing information on batteries that last eternally.  My ability to comment on something can not affect what is, or is not in textbooks.  QED

[profitis]

A)its a white lie and if i didnt admit it you wouldnt,ve been able to prove it without tremendous effort so you should thank me for saving you the effort @sarkeizen.you preach about ethics yet theres a section on the nernst equation in your book just a few pages ahead or behind your photo-page which you claim is non-existant putting you in a category of a liar of the 2nd type,a hardened liar,as opposed to a liar of the 1st type,a white liar or a liar of the 3rd type,a white liar that admits a white lie under non-duress...B)your ability to comment on something definitely affects YOUR case for defence of kelvin laws.this is about your ability to defend your client in this courtroom.thus when the jury see that you are unable to explain kelvin role in batteries mentioned in certain encyclopedias accused of being perpetual motion devices,a task that should be excessively easy for you,they begin to doubt your case.you were even challenged to bring in an expert witness to help your case but you didnt?

[sarkeizen]

A)its a white lie

Punishing only honest people is a good idea?  Riiiiight.  How often do you tell yourself that?  How often do you try to get people to thank you for being dishonest?

and if i didnt admit it you wouldnt,ve been able to prove it without tremendous effort

Uh wrong. I have the book in question, you don't.   So, not much effort.  Sorry if you overestimate what you add to a discussion.  I'm sure it's not the last time.

which you claim is non-existant putting you in a category of a liar

Please cite where I lied.  Sorry but you lose.

your ability to comment on something definitely affects

Nothing to do with textbooks.  So it can't actually support or deny your point.  Soooooo....again you are making an argument from ignorance.

Again, this isn't exactly a hard thing to check.

[profitis]

...definitely affects your case.which makes you look like a bad defender of kelvin statement..which is what this is about...even mr tim123 who jumped into the thread all excited like a waiter on methamphetamine,then left with a 'call-me-later'note is thinking of returning @sarkeizen.its you making this thread semi-exciting with your inability to disprove perpetuum mobilum in wikipedia territory..