Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



quentron.com

Started by Philip Hardcastle, April 04, 2012, 05:00:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 36 Guests are viewing this topic.

profitis

@sarkeizen and just how does the profitis statement not grossly enforce an kelvin breach, by the book?we are waiting for your explanation because you are implying that the profitis statement does not totaly support my ipod statement.

MarkE

Quote from: profitis on February 20, 2014, 02:43:48 AM
@mark E the burden of disproof is upon the person making extra-ordinary claims too. you claim theres no macroscopic kelvin violations,the evidence says otherwise.evidence by the book..
Profitis your claim of macroscopic violation of the Second Law of Energy is an extraordinary one.  Feel free to offer proof of your extraordinary claim.  Given that in a week you have failed to offer the reference you promised to me, and that it has been God only knows how many months you have failed to provide any cite supporting your extraordinary claims to sarkeizen it is reasonable to conclude that it will be a very long time before you offer any evidence, much less a proof for your extraordinary claim that you have a demonstrable case of a macroscopic Second Law of Energy violation. 

You seem to be intelligent.  Why do you intentionally play yourself as a fool?

sarkeizen

Quote from: profitis on February 20, 2014, 02:46:48 AM
you are implying that the profitis statement does not totaly support my ipod statement.
No, since the "ipod statement" which we will call "The *real* profitis statement" from now on is dependent on a textbook cite and a conclusion ending with the Real Profitis Statement and since whatever other thing you are blathering about does not provide these things.  You have provided nothing to demonstrate  the relevance of your other blather.

Hey, you proved me right.  You went straight to "irrelevant statement" phase of your gibberish.  Next you will confuse asserting with demonstrating or jump back to demanding to prove some other irrelevant statement.

profitis

@mark E why dont you just take my twisted textbook statement and just show us how crappy it is?i mean it should be easy for you to do right? counter-attack the profitis statement @mark E instead of standing there and demanding a video of it.

profitis

you,re saying i failed to show how textbooks help to power your ipod forever by declaring my textbook words null and void sarkeizen? Laughable.