quentron.com

[gravityblock]

Are you lost ... yet again?

Another psychological projection of yourself.  It is you who is lost and way out in left field.  I'm not even sure if you can be found anywhere near the ballpark.  I'll ask again, where did I ever say weight is energy?

Gravock

[MarkE]

Another psychological projection of yourself.  It is you who is lost and way out in left field.  I'm not even sure if you can be found anywhere near the ballpark.  I'll ask again, where did I ever say weight is energy?

Gravock

Trolling, trolling down the river.

[gravityblock]

Trolling, trolling down the river.

It is you who is trolling, trolling down the river and not me.  Where did I say weight is energy as you wrongly and falsely asserted?  You're nothing more than a forum clown trying to misdirect others!

Gravock

[MarkE]

You are so lost.

[sarkeizen]

Don't underestimate chinese research pomodoro,they have a coupla trillion dollars loose change lying around

This is kind of interesting.  Research in Chinese journals is often considered of low quality.  There are a lot of reasons, poor controls - that is it's exceptionally unlikely to get caught, political pressure and high competition, high value of success and low cost of failure.  The example that often gets cited is in acupuncture trials Chinese journals have a 100% success rate.  In American journals they have close to 0%.  Acupuncture is only slightly removed from fantasy in terms of mechanism.  So it's true likelihood should be closer to that of the American journals but for some reason Chinese journals just can't manage to show no effect.