Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



quentron.com

Started by Philip Hardcastle, April 04, 2012, 05:00:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 34 Guests are viewing this topic.

profitis

Quenco's are edging there way onto the scene.here's a quenco based on continual cyclic hydrogen spillover: http://revolution-green.com/paradigm-change/

sarkeizen

Quote from: profitis on September 20, 2014, 03:13:26 AM
Quenco's are edging there way onto the scene.here's a quenco based on continual cyclic hydrogen spillover
I've heard him talk on his PN diode nonsense. 

It's the usual problem.  He presents a device which sounds simple - the diode driven oscillator - the way he explains it it should be simple enough for anyone to build.  However he immediately jumps to fabricating this at the nano scale.  Which should tell you that there exists no simple easily built device which would unambiguously demonstrate the principle.

As soon as you are there the argument becomes which is more likely.  That 2nd law is wrong or could he have perhaps missed something.  Smart money is on the later.

profitis

Incorrect @sarkeizen.sheehan is only allowed to show or openly discuss a very,very,very limited amount of shit (propriety,nda,neon-sign fear etc ).he gets paid,he gets paid big.he is very well equipped in the lab

sarkeizen

Quote from: profitis on September 26, 2014, 05:26:42 AM
Incorrect @sarkeizen.sheehan is only allowed to show or openly discuss a very,very,very limited amount of shit (propriety,nda,neon-sign fear etc ).he gets paid,he gets paid big.he is very well equipped in the lab
Either I have to believe Sheehan that 2LOT violations are as easy to construct as he discussed in his lecture or he is wrong.  The math is simply on the side of the later.

MarkE

Quote from: profitis on September 26, 2014, 05:26:42 AM
Incorrect @sarkeizen.sheehan is only allowed to show or openly discuss a very,very,very limited amount of shit (propriety,nda,neon-sign fear etc ).he gets paid,he gets paid big.he is very well equipped in the lab
If and when Dr. Sheehan can ever report a confirmed violation of the second law, we can all be very certain that he will report as much.  To paraphrase Dr. Sheehan:  "The Second Law is true, except when it isn't."  Finding an exception if such an exception exists is the big, yet to happen trick.

As prospective Second Law violating devices, diodes are a lousy prospect.  Diodes do however make good RF detectors.  The local radio station, Wi-Fi router, cell phone etc are not Second Law violations.