Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



quentron.com

Started by Philip Hardcastle, April 04, 2012, 05:00:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.

The Boss

Quote from: markdansie on February 01, 2013, 11:06:46 PM

anyone who believes any of this deserves what they get.


Mark,

...a quick divergence from this subject. What was your take on Ainslie ?

Thanks,

Philip Hardcastle

Dear MileHigh,

I am not sure what you are asking. Expand if you care too.

Do you want me to whisper the names of the 2 scientists that gave me dates that did not materialise during the months of March to August 2012? What would you do with that information, call them liars or incompetent?

Here are a few realities for you to chew on, in just one year we are now ready  to make things few people in the World know how to, we learned by virtue of the efforts of 2 very capable and generous Australian scientists who are experts in their fields, they genuinely thought it could be done in a few easy steps and then they found that it could not, but this was understandable as they had never tried to make things so small. Then I consulted a few other experts in nano-fabrication and I found that there was nobody that actually knew how to do it and that it was all so cutting edge that an estimate was really just a guess. I passed on those guesses and even based a lot of my life around them. Then we tried to get it done in Stanford from October to Decdmber but alas by the time we resolved all the unknowns, the materials, the etching, the depositions, the annealing and so forth, we ran out of time to do it with precision, so we decided that we would have a Christmas break and then start again in the New Year.

So what part of this is unbelievable to you? or are you simply calling me a liar? Sarky went on and on and on about me being a bad project manager, well since I missed all my stated deadlines that is a sustainable criticism just as soon as he shows me someone that has done the same task better in a year. It is illogical to expect me to tell you how long the near impossible is going to take, we already found out about 4x more than we all thought, now I can estimate how long the difficult is going to take with greater precision, but the best answer is clearly very Sooooooooooooooooooon.

Now I post here for no reason other than to be friendly to a community, check back through all my posts and tell me where I ask for a penny, of course you all can form opinions but if you want to call me a liar at least use your real names and post the evidence, otherwise why make comments on a forum about a person based upon your own prejudices?

MileHigh

Philip:

I can go onto Google and YouTube and probably find more than 100 zero-content web sites and inane video clips promising nonsensical free energy propositions.  They either want to get you to invest, or buy "master licenses," or send in money for the plans.  None of them can show working devices.  I see a strong resemblance.

The only way you are going to convince me is with a working device.  Then when I read your alleged specs of 1000 amps per square centimeter I roll my eyes.  You endorsed that ridiculous toaster oven experiment.  You can't discuss the nature of the alleged electrical output of the device using the proper terminology.  You have never quoted any experimental data where you discuss the ambient heat allegedly absorbed by the device and the temperature drop of the thermal mass you were dealing with, the measured electrical energy output, etc.  Your web site is emotionally charged and on the defensive.  You keep on missing deadlines and if you were working with real people in the real word then what you are alleging would not be happening.

If you were real your storyline and how you release information and present your proposition and a myriad of other things would all be completely different.

That's my thought process about you.  Nothing adds up.

MileHigh

markdansie

Regarding Ainslie (off topic) I am still reviewing some of her papers with a scientist friend of mine. We have not completed that yet , but what I find will not be made public as I have to respect the her wishes under the conditions they given to me.
Up until now, pre review, I have not seen anything that I would consider anymore ground breaking than the LENR claims out there. I would like to see how such technologies can be put into any practical applications.
Kind Regards

Elisha

I´m Happy to see Philip is well and make again post here.

The quenco device will be in a soon week, we dont need the date, we just need the device well done!.

Everything have a time, that we can not accelerate.

The Eternal God guide Us !