quentron.com

[Bayani47]

It's interesting how much people want to interpret yet another failure to deliver and yet another failed device as a positive thing.  <cue anecdotes about Edison et. al.>

After quite a number of posts of "oh if you can just wait until February" and after many moronic sermons on patience. We are objectively in the same spot we were over a year ago.  No functioning device and March isn't looking good either.

  Again I ask the obvious question, which all but a few are busy rationalizing.  At what point do you adjust your odds that Philip will produce anything?

Right to the point sarkeizen. I've been watching this thread since August and it's all talk no show. There isn't even any working prototype! It's all publicity and viewing counts to keep this thread alive and possibly to keep investors up to date / invest on the (fantasy) device. 

[hollander]

I see it also as a sign of his good character that he is not trying to hide a setback or a failed attempt.  He puts it out there for everyone to see.   Just one of the reasons I believe in his honesty and that this is certainly no scam.

Yes, Phil is honest but simply does not understand that he is wasting his money and his time with improbable physics. Not always honesty saves everything.

[profitis]

@gianna,hey at least its free work.who,s gonna complain about wether its a 2lot buster or not.heat is pumped uphill for free in the ambient thats all that matters.

[profitis]

@hollander.i dont think its improbable physics, for example i have built a type of self-charging capacitor here and designed it specificaly with circumventing the 2lot in mind and its a total success,exceeding my expectations in fact at several milliamps(not microamps) and 1volt per cm2 of paper-thin electrode area.you can repeatedly discharge this thing ad nauseum with absolutely zero reduction in power output.the problem is phil has to expend a huge amount of energy and money for each test run as his system needs to be highly orderly in order to function.

[hollander]

@hollander.i dont think its improbable physics, for example i have built a type of self-charging capacitor here and designed it specificaly with circumventing the 2lot in mind and its a total success,exceeding my expectations in fact at several milliamps(not microamps) and 1volt per cm2 of paper-thin electrode area.you can repeatedly discharge this thing ad nauseum with absolutely zero reduction in power output.the problem is phil has to expend a huge amount of energy and money for each test run as his system needs to be highly orderly in order to function.

My "improbable physics" refers to his design (he thought that "tunneling" can solve everything, it could even enhance thermionic emission above its physical limit). Now, I feel close to Philip as never before. It is a bit sad he did not realize that before (and he still does not realize that).

@ profitis Could you give more details about your capacitor?