quentron.com

[profitis]

dont start shit now @sarkeizen..this thread ended nice and peacefully on a note that made every single word you uttered look null and void.. You cant rectify it..your too late..go spend some time with the family..

[sarkeizen]

dont start shit now

What I said was true.  Even if someone had a lab, very well equipped they would be wasting their money to attempt to replicate your device.


If you can't deal.  Then argue your point instead of evading all the time.

[profitis]

ive got half a lab with no gas cylinders lying around and i managed just fine @sarkeizen..it makes me scared to think what corporates can do with this shit.you have to dislocate THE monstrous profitis statement in order to have any hope of salvation here.THE profitis statement derived from higher textbooks.its useless to tell me that it must be argued because it embodies the argument..

[sarkeizen]

ive got half a lab with no gas cylinders lying around and i managed just fine

Then you didn't understand what I wrote.  I said it would be a waste of money.  That still stands.

THE profitis statement derived from made-up textbooks

Sadly is irrelevant.  The True Profitis Statement is the thing that matters and you have left that unsupported for months.  I'm sure we can all guess why.  Because you can't support it.   If it was so easy as you claimed to support from textbooks anyone can find.   Then it stands to reason that you would have already done so.  However, you haven't.  So the likely case is you really have no idea how to support your idea.

its useless to tell me that it must be argued because it embodies the argument..

I gather that all sorts of reason and logic are useless to tell you.

[profitis]

 no i doubt that they would consider my statement a waste of money because its derived entirely from textbooks and those physicists are pretty jacked up so they know their shit.i mean if i told them something like 'hey guys,im going to christen this thing a hydrino' or 'hey guys this thing sucks aether' then yes they'd probably just laugh but im not doing that.why dont you consult a textbook and see,just see if you can find fault with my statement @sarkeizen and come tell us about it? My original statement can be integrated into my latest one so wheres the problem? It,l be too tedious for me to cite and splain every single cause-and-effect up the chain to a kelvin breach with you complaining about space-bars and grammar and other irrelevencies along the way and i know you will.so im starting at the top of the pyramid and now you must do the investigation down the effect to cause base.