quentron.com

[MarkE]

Well, it has been a week and Profitis has not found a reference.  I think that a week was plenty of time for Profitis to find a reference to support his seemingly unusual idea.  I therefore conclude that Profitis couldn't find such a reference and his unusual idea is flawed.

Offline profitis

    Hero Member
    *****
    Posts: 1080
        View Profile
        Personal Message (Offline)

Re: quentron.com
« Reply #2118 on: February 14, 2014, 03:25:30 PM »

    Quote

im going to have to hunt for one mark E. But dont you think that the o2 potential on the anode is diluted by the larger surface area of submerged electrode surface and the potential more concentrated on the cathode with less area for charge distribution?

[profitis]

lol @sarkeizen.check your feeble attempts to derail the monster profitis statement! Lololololol! Giggle . While we,re waiting for you to disrupt that awesomely powerful iron-clad statement i think its time to move onto the next phase of our discussion: the ramifications that a text-book-strangled kelvin law will now have on other areas of science eg.electromagnetism,magnetism,electrostatics,semiconductors,quantum physics,steady-state-non-equilibrium physics,nuclear physics etc.

[profitis]

cmon mr superscientist mark E..we want you to put your money where your mouth is.we dont wana hear just talk.we want you to topple the monstrosity of a statement,the profitis statement.cmon,pull those formulas out clint-eastwood styles (giggle).you cant because that statement casts a huge dark shadow over your hero: captain pile-steamer-kelvin

[MarkE]

cmon mr superscientist mark E..we want you to put your money where your mouth is.we dont wana hear just talk.we want you to topple the monstrosity of a statement,the profitis statement.cmon,pull those formulas out clint-eastwood styles (giggle).you cant because that statement casts a huge dark shadow over your hero: captain pile-steamer-kelvin

Do you really think you are going to get somewhere with behavior like that?

[profitis]

@mark E..unless you destroy my statement..yes (-: