quentron.com

[MarkE]

Stating that he has reactions without consuming reagents would be tantamount to violation of conservation of mass / energy.  I don't know how he intends to try and wiggle out of that one.

[profitis]

So great teacher markeiz..tsss..markE: What reagent is used up or burned up in the galvanic spillover cycle. Where is our fuel,please locate it for us mr genius.ps there is no violation of the first law thermo.

[MarkE]

So great teacher markeiz..tsss..markE: What reagent is used up or burned up in the galvanic spillover cycle. Where is our fuel,please locate it for us mr genius.ps there is no violation of the first law thermo.

LOL, you claim that you get energy out of something without changing that something, and you think that is not tantamount to a claim that violates the First Law?  Please stop!  My sides hurt.

[profitis]

@mark E. You have to show that catalyst hydrogen or oxygen spillover will not power a battery forever otherwise we cannot bring ourselves to believe you.

[MarkE]

@mark E. You have to show that catalyst hydrogen or oxygen spillover will not power a battery forever otherwise we cannot bring ourselves to believe you.

LOL, every time I have noticed you make an outrageous claim I've watched you eventuallyretreat behind a claim that someone else bears the burden of proving the ordinary status quo.  No buddy, they don't.  The burden of proof falls upon the person making the extraordinary claim.You make the silly claims of eternal power sources.  If you have actual evidence that supports your claims then you could present that evidence at anytime.  ... All anyone gets from you are crickets.  We have been over many times what you need to show to support claims of a thermodynamically reversible process.  Months later, your lips keep moving but no data has been forthcoming.