Overunity, Green Energy, Powered by Gravity!

[hartiberlin]

Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:32 am    Post subject: Re: re: Vandusen Bessler wheel replication   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ovyyus wrote:

Yes, I have the self-starting video where he walks up to the wheel, positions it, lets it go and it turns for less than 1/4 rotation. The full video is 000_0235.mov at 12,525 KB. You probably have a section of that.

Why does the wheel only turn about 1/4 rotation from that specific position? Because it is made top heavy in that specific position. Why doesn't Vandusen show at least one full rotation? Because the top heavy wheel will only accelerate for about 1/4 rotation from that specific position before it begins to slow and stop. Vandusen points to the fact that it makes 2 x 30 deg cycles knowing full well that that is only the case because he has made it top heavy in that position. Why? In order to create the impression that his wheel actually works when in fact it does not - so he can scam people for money.

Okay, I also got now this video.
Well, it is now totally clear what I am seeing.
Watch the weights and spoke?s ends !
The unlock system at 12 o ?clock is not working properly.
Thus in this video he first has to fix it at 2 o?clock, so that the wheel
can self starts. He must push it back to the right position.
That is at about 30 seconds in the videoclip and then the wheel
actually accelerates !
You see then, that the whole
torquearm of the right side is heavier than the whole left side !

Now then the wheels turns and accelerates and
just about before the end
at second 53 to 54 you see a weight again at around 1 to 3 pm
again not having resetted and unlocked and is not in the outer position,
so at this position it is loosing the heavier torquearm,
cause the upper pushout mechanism has failed for this weight.

This is why it slows a bit down in this special video 54 second long video...

Now as I have seen this video this even tells me even more, that this
thing works !

Michael wrote:

Stefan, you say the principle is valid. Please explain what the principle is so I and others can check the physics.
Thanks,
Michael

You always have 6 weights at the right side of the wheel 3 inches
more far away from the axis than on the left side.
That means enough torque to reset ( lock and unlock)
only 2 weights every 30 degrees by 1.5 inches.
And if you do it with springs you store the energy in one
place and get it for free in the other place so you have to spend
the energy only to unlock and shift one weight at a time ,
so you just need only to push in the weight at 6 to 7 o ?clock and
get the unlock at 12 o ?clock for free there if you use springs.

Then you only have to overcome the lift of one weight and the spring
compression at 6-7 o?clock via the heavier torquearm of the right side of the wheel.
This is why Darrell says there is at least a 12 spoke machine needed to do it,
otherwise the torque is not enough to lift the weight !


Hope this helps.

[nightwynd]

lol, I think that pretty much explains the 30 degree reset principal for everyone

[sterlinga]

Hi Darrell,

Please contact me privately to arrange the details for someone to come visit you to validate your claim to an operational Gravity Motor.
http://www.pureenergysystems.com/about/personnel/SterlingDAllan/

Office phone: 801-407-1292
email: sterlingda@pureenergysystems.com

Our editor for PES Network, Inc. lives not far from you and said she would be glad to go inspect your device for us.
http://www.pureenergysystems.com/about/personnel/Mary-SueHaliburton/

First, before we make those arrangements, I want to be clear on what it is the witness will see when they visit you. 

To be "valid" the device needs to fit the following criteria:
1) Rotate a full 360 degrees
2) The speed being faster after one full rotation.

If you don't have that, then you do not have a functioning prototype that proves the concept of harnessing the force of gravity.

Partial rotation is not adequate to prove the point, because it can be caused by regional imbalance in the wheel.

Sincerely,

| Sterling D. Allan
|
| New Energy Congress
| http://newenergycongress.org
|
| PES Network, Inc, Executive Director
| http://pureenergysystems.com
| http://freeenergynews.com
| http://pesn.com
| http://peswiki.com
|
|   "The best news and directory service on the net
|    regarding cutting edge energy technologies."
|
| newsletter: fe_updates-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
|
| home office: 1-801-407-1292
| Eagle Mountain, Utah, USA

[nightwynd]

It would probably be better for you guys to do the eye witness account - you have more credibility than I do
Doesn't mean I don't want to see it for myself still however

I'm still trying to make time Darrell, I'll be in touch as soon as I can.

[mark australia]

Dear Darrell,
I think Stirlings suggestion is an excellent Idea. Striling and the organisations he is with have a world wide reputation of being strong supporters of inventors and free energy. I have had a few talks with you, which I have enjoyed. (PS the NDD will be scanned and sent tommorrow..I lost the battle with my scanner will have it done soon).
I feel you would do your self a big favour in having it independently tested as proof of concept.
If this did take place, I am confident investors would be lining up at your door and you would be in the running for some prize money.
Mark