Using Chas Cambel Flywheel System For 15 Horsepower

[a.king21]

I have made no claims.  I am repeating the laws of physics which have been proven over and over again.  If YOU are making a claim that those laws are wrong, then it is YOU that must prove it.  IF you are able to do so, then your Nobel prize awaits.

Bill

So you are repeating something you read in a book.
That's a great experimenter.
Chas Campbell is repeating something he created. You prove him wrong ONLY, ONLY, ONLY by replicating
his work and proving it does not work.


You do not prove him wrong by quoting something you read in a book.
BTW A couple of decades ago the Laws of Physics said that boiling water took longer to freeze than hot water.
A schoolboy in England did the experiment and proved them wrong.
This is a forum for experimenters - not people who quote facts  from books they have not replicated.

[Pirate88179]

So you are repeating something you read in a book.
That's a great experimenter.
Chas Campbell is repeating something he created. You prove him wrong ONLY, ONLY, ONLY by replicating
his work and proving it does not work.


You do not prove him wrong by quoting something you read in a book.
BTW A couple of decades ago the Laws of Physics said that boiling water took longer to freeze than hot water.
A schoolboy in England did the experiment and proved them wrong.
This is a forum for experimenters - not people who quote facts  from books they have not replicated.

Myself, and Pirate Labs, have done hundreds of experiments and replications all well documented on both my youtube channel and my website.  I have not replicated this device as I only do so with devices that actually have a chance of actually working.  Where are YOUR experiments?

FYI:  The laws of physics are just not in one book....but many, many books.  I have done many flywheel experiments and I'll be darned, those laws were correct.  Prove me wrong.  I would actually love to see that.  I would also like to see Chas make something that works too.  Maybe one day...

Bill

[No clue 25]

Just my 2 but it seems to me that most the physics taught is not the whole enchilada.  Planet earth as a whole still doesn't even understand the smallest things about quantum physics.  A lot of things happen on this planet and others that nobody can explain.  So it's hard for me to really worry about what's in math books especially physics.  Not to long ago it was in text books that there where no other planets anywhere just the 8-9 that we could c.  Seems like a lot of them r there to mislead the ones who question.   

Personally I think there could b something in the chas design as well as many others.  Pirate I would like to c ur experiments with flywheels as I am in that process right now and u have probably covered many other questions I have.  Based in my calculations I can store upwards of 12000joules in my flywheel so I think there is plenty of room there to play. 

There is no point in a pissing contest we r all just trying to sift through the shit the media and government feeds us.

[ramset]

Grumage
Quote
""Pulsing?? Simple !! Loose belt and an eccentric roller that is pulled into the belt and tightens it flings it round and does it again and again !! Simples !! However you could just try it with a stick to start with.  (http://www.overunity.com/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)

Well that's enough for now, I hope I have provided some food for thought??""
--------------------------------------------------

@Grum
thankyou for that pulse Idea, as well as the offer to share your findings.
it would seem that this pulsing [loose coupling] would be the only plausibe explanation for energy entering this system.

Non Syncronous Acceleration in a belted drive system would be interesting to see?
I actually hope you find an NSA anonomly ...



with all respect and Gratitude

Chet K

[markdansie]

@ A King 21. The Chas Cambel device failed all third party verification tests even by friendly parties. Saying you have to build one to prove it wrong is a waste of time and resources. The point is the original one never worked as claimed, end of story.
Like all the other devices and inventors making overunity claims, no one can produce a shred of evidence that they do as claimed or even a practical demonstration. The emphases is on them to prove their claim is supported, not others to disprove their claim.
Kind Regards
Mark