Unipolar Induction - Relative motion isn't needed!

[gravityblock]

Proof Of Concept Test Report -  Abstract: A simple test is performed on a brushless a. c. pickup Faraday generator wherein it is shown that power extraction does not slow down the prime mover. Then it is shown that a conventional generator loaded at the same power does slow down the prime mover significantly. The result indicates a vast improvement over conventional power generation methods.  Video demonstration showing power extraction doesn't slow down the prime mover (no back torque).  In this video, it is proven that shorting the brushless Faraday Free Energy Generator coils not only causes an increase in rotation speed but also causes a decrease of drive current to the prime mover a.c. motor. This is opposite to conventional generator/motor action.

Gravock

[gravityblock]

@Broli,

Open Circuit!

The text in the image below, as found on page 7 of Jerry Bayles publication on a successful brushless Faraday generator, sounds very similar to the open circuit we have been looking for.  When the magnet discs are spun, the standing wave around the discs will degenerate and an electromagnetic field will be radiated which is proportional to the rotational velocity.  In the conclusions of that paper, Bayles says the dimensions of the magnets used develop a standing wave that yield the properties of being related to the golden ratio.  For those who may be interested in duplicating the simple test arrangement, the magnets can be purchased from: http://www.kjmagnetics.com/proddetail.asp?prod=RY046.  I'll be ordering two magnets before next week.

Gravock

[broli]

I'm a bit critical concerning that specific experiment. Permanent magnets are inherently not perfect, these slight imperfections may be the cause of the induced voltage in the behemoth coil he's using at the rim to pick up the changing field. It would be interesting to see whether a single magnet has the same effect, what two magnets in attraction would do, and if the same voltage is generated using EM's instead of PM's

[gravityblock]

I'm a bit critical concerning that specific experiment. Permanent magnets are inherently not perfect, these slight imperfections may be the cause of the induced voltage in the behemoth coil he's using at the rim to pick up the changing field. It would be interesting to see whether a single magnet has the same effect, what two magnets in attraction would do, and if the same voltage is generated using EM's instead of PM's.

Here's a video showing a magnetic balance resonance tests using four strong magnetic disks instead of the previous two tests, with first two, and then one disk.  Due to the number of magnetic disks, slight irregularities of the field due to flaws in the magnetic fields can be ruled out as the cause of this unbalance and energy flow as these would tend to cancel out.  Here's a video showing a magnetic one-disk resonance tests utilizing a two-magnet balance system.  For further information, please read the description of the videos.  Also, here's the link to the website of Jerry Bayles.  I really find the electron 1/2 spin test, where the balanced magnets must revolve twice around the disc magnet in order to return to it's original starting position very intriguing.

Gravock

[tinu]

  I really find the electron 1/2 spin test, where the balanced magnets must revolve twice around the disc magnet in order to return to it's original starting position very intriguing.

Gravock

It is intriguing indeed!
However, 1/2 spin is just because he encircles the magnets counter-clockwise. The spin would have been different, probably 2, for clockwise case. Agree? (I’m sorry but I’m too tired and lazy to prepare a setup and check it exactly with a compass).

Best regards,
Tinu