Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity

[tim123]

Anyway, still need to clarify a point with you: if I see something which looks to me against the lessons already taken from the past, lessons which have made the device working, do you want I indicate you it?

Yes, please do. I intend to replicate just as everyone else has done, just in my own way, but if I'm doing it wrong - then I want to know...

~ 48 € for the pipe and 60 € for the copper wire...
Do you have cheap but stable and precise enough frequency generator to advise me? Or any equilavent?

Here's a new 5MHz sig-gen for £25 from china. If you look around you can get a few secondhand bargains too:
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/0-5MHz-SG1005-Function-Signal-Generator-Source-Frequency-Counter-DDS-Module-Wave-/251316032611

With this device it is VERY DIFFERENT than all the others in ou.com which have not been proved as clear and full documented and already replicated by many, like the "RAG" (Richard's AutoGenerator) is; here we have a device who already produces systematically an overunity, that's why it is less, i.m.o., a problem of "finding new ideas" than to do better and more accurately what has been already done.

Can you post a link to the engineers report please? In french is ok...

But think he said that to be able to go up to the advanced experiments where precision looks to be important...

I have no experience yet of some of the test equipment - like SWR meters etc... I'm looking forward to finding out... Once I get to needing them, I'll be looking for some bargains... Hopefully will have enough precision.

Regards, Tim

[tim123]

The 2 copper pipes were 300 mm long right? Could remember me the Richard's frequency for 600 mm? Please.

My 2 tubes are 150mm each - and the brass bolts make them a bit longer.

The coil is about 340mm - so it covers them completely.

The spreadsheet said about 6.5MHz, but when i tested it - it was best at about 3.6MHz - exactly the same as the 1 meter U!? I will be testing it again today - and recording it properly - given time...

For a 600mm tube, the sheet says: 4.64 MHz...


Tim

PS - I am also going to make a longer folded wire core - to see if I can bring the freq down to your sub-1MHz... 15m of wire should do it...

[tim123]

I've built an amp to drive it... Sames as JNL's:
http://jnaudin.free.fr/rvproject/html/ugentest27.htm

- IRFP450 - £2.50
- Heatsink & Wire- from old HiFi - £0
- Phenolic Base - £2
- Connector - £1.50 ish
- Rubber feet - 20p
- Heatsink glue - 20p
- Total cost - £6.40 ish

Isn't it cool
(I hope it works)

[Khwartz]

My 2 tubes are 150mm each - and the brass bolts make them a bit longer.

The coil is about 340mm - so it covers them completely.

The spreadsheet said about 6.5MHz, but when i tested it - it was best at about 3.6MHz - exactly the same as the 1 meter U!? I will be testing it again today - and recording it properly - given time...

Sorry to say that but are you sure you aren't still confusing between a search for coil resonance instead of Richard's frequency?  (as BlueDragron already noticed it to you; relevant note or not, see after...)

This is something which intriguing me much and I will need to clarify it with the guys in cos.com: if Richard's frequency couple with a supposed SPECIFIC frequency of the stuck electrons with the nucleus of the copper, how this frequency could CHANGE with the length of the bar?!

Indeed, if the frequency change, so the imposed exciting vibration of the stuck electrons changes. Would mean that has not basically to do with an intrinsic frequency proper to the stuck electrons but would have more to do with looking for a kind of sonic LIKE resonance of the wall bar (the ones which would have the largest amplitude, in the range of sensibility of the nucleus components), so indeed depending of the length and of the material, but could be an ELECTROMAGNETIC one (resonance).

By this resonance, closed enough to the frequency of the nucleus components (would be electrons or not, and probably electrons a per Richard's calculations), these components see indeed their oscillating mouvements strength by vibrational parametric coupling (accumulation of energy in the waves in the the form of increasing amplitude), until a point (could be concerning Ferranti effect but on short distances in this case? Or a like phenomenon of obtention of paroxysmal excitation) so that to be able to, they need to pump zero point energy to maintain their binding with the nucleus; while in between the excitation impulse, in the nodes of the sinus wave, they would release in our dimensions, the energy they had pumped just before in the "ascending" phase of the sinus wave. (Which ould mean the existence of a kind of "one way path" for that kind of energy in this case, a "zpe valve phenomenon").

If my conjecture is true enough, in my understanding, it would explain why Richard's frequency changes with the length and material indeed; do you see what I mean? do you see the tiny conceptual change in the understanding it would be? (If I am not mistaking.)

For a 600mm tube, the sheet says: 4.64 MHz...


Tim

OK, thanks for specifying
Khwartz

PS - I am also going to make a longer folded wire core - to see if I can bring the freq down to your sub-1MHz... 15m of wire should do it...

You mean like with the JLN'S NextGen?

Any way, you look having made a clean and cheap amplifier

[Khwartz]

Yes, please do. I intend to replicate just as everyone else has done, just in my own way, but if I'm doing it wrong - then I want to know...

OK, so you have to know that the efficency in the induction between the coil and the core (like copper pipe) looks to be of main importance. So each time you add space in between and/or dielectric insulation, like the thickness of the pvc pipe, you weaken the efficiency, so the outpower you could be able to obtain at the output.

I understand your present configuration helps you to test different cores, but when you have chosen one, better to wrappe as close as possible of the core, the wire of the coil, totally joined enamelled wire directly wrapped on a very thin layer of isulation like Teflon tape, looks having been the best until now.

So, in the same idea, I advise you to change your "female" 10-12 mm copper caps for "male" ones you could weld inside the copper pipe and not outside, while outside it makes exceeding thickness.

Here's a new 5MHz sig-gen for £25 from china. If you look around you can get a few secondhand bargains too:
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/0-5MHz-SG1005-Function-Signal-Generator-Source-Frequency-Counter-DDS-Module-Wave-/251316032611

Wow! Very cheap indeed thanks a lot for the help :p

Can you post a link to the engineers report please? In french is ok...

Lol, if we had it, we wouldn't have needed to work so hard to recover the way to do!

The problem was Richard had a private sponsor in Switzerland but Richard came in disagreement apparently with the company because the company looked having no intention to spread the device but to keep it secret. So all the équipements and documents have been kept by the company and even were protected by kind of copyright, so couldn't be disclosed. So we only have the memory of Richard (and Pascuser too I think cause helped Richard), as reference, but don't have the details of the electronics, so that is the problem. :/

I have no experience yet of some of the test equipment - like SWR meters etc... I'm looking forward to finding out... Once I get to needing them, I'll be looking for some bargains... Hopefully will have enough precision.

Regards, Tim

A "miniNVA" could help you but I think it is more than 200 €. Looks Verpies' in/out power comparator could help you if you can do it for a much lesser cost.

http://www.overunity.com/12736/kapanadze-cousin-dally-free-energy/dlattach/attach/130707/


Best regards,
Khwartz