Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity

[verpies]

Would we have a kind of phase wave for a magnetic field?

In a ferri/ferromagnetic core - yes.  See here.
In a paramagnetic material or vacuum - I doubt it.

[Khwartz]

Thanks for the tips.

Your very welcomed, dear tim

I'll see what i can find for inside plugs.

OK.

After talking about windchimes I'm wondering about having movable plugs - to test the output along the tube - maybe find the 'node' points..?

Good to try

Ah, i see... :/

Yeah, but the kind of amplification system looks have been the one JNL based his schematic until the V6 wich looks the best amplifier he made.

I note for you that his amplifiers are not the best system for advanced experiments up to date.

The best system up to January 2013, where COP of 35 has been very rigorously registred, WOULD be with what Colas called a "CLASS E or F, 90-95 % HF AMPLIFIER", like the RM KL-500/24, you will find here (sorry, I have only the page in French but you should find a equivalent in French):

http://www.cbplus.com/cat/product982/product_info.html

Careful: I was not saying Colas used this kind of HF amplifier, he used JNL's V6. But he has very hard times with having much transistors 4 € /unit burnt and a very poor efficiency for the amplifier like 35% if I remember well. Then looks it has "strange behaviours" like very unlinear evolution with frequency.

Could be, if you are skill enough in electronic you may built your own knowing the characteristics of the RM-KL but if you have the means, the advantage is nobody could say the material would not be appropriate to the frequencies or has any error.

Talking about the sonic / standing waves idea again... I wonder what the speed of sound in copper is - and whether it is related? Perhaps all these things have to synchronise for full effect...?


Tim

I think you could have something here, like having a common harmonic of all but close enough of the electronic vibrations.

According to Richard it would be the frequency of the bound electrons.

As I can know, superconductivity at law temperatures are about phonons.

Speed of sound in copper: ~ 3 570 m.s^-1.

[verpies]

Speed of sound in copper: ~ 3 570 m.s^-1.

Not quite - see here and here and here.

Longitudinal: 4760m/s - 5010m/s
  Transverse: 2270m/s - 2325m/s
Extensional: 3570m/s - 3810m/s

For most acoustics, the Longitudinal speed is relevant.

[Khwartz]

Not quite - see here and here and here.

Longitudinal: 4760m/s - 5010m/s
  Transverse: 2270m/s - 2325m/s
Extensional: 3570m/s - 3810m/s

For most acoustics, the Longitudinal speed is relevant.

Fuck-up to  you, verpies! Your are so nuts that you even don' t understand what means "~" and not able to realise that we are indeed in the case mainly of longitudinal waves in the case of bars.

GO TO TROLL A OTHER THREAD!

I had already noticed in the discussion I had created on the possible basics of overunity that you were not even able to read my posts before to critic, here you have already done the same an other post: you borrow thoughts, you imagine in your your mind thoughts which are only there and then you try covertly attac these same conclusions which are only in your mind, like if it were other's. You're a silly man and I will no more respond or react to any of your post where ever you post them.

[d3x0r]

Fuck-up to  you, verpies! Your are so nuts that you even don' t understand what means "~" and not able to relise that we are indeed in the case mainly of longitudinal waves in the case of bars.

GO TO TROLL A OTHER THREAD!

I had already noticed in the discussion I had created on the possible basics of overunity that you were not even able to read my posts before to critic, here you have already done the same an other post: you borrow thoughts, you imagine in your your mind thoughts which are only there and then you try covertly attac these same conclusions which are only in your mind, like if it were other's. You're a silly man and I will no more respond or react to any of your post where ever you post them.

Then why did you list the extension sound velocity instead of the longitudinal?