Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity

[Khwartz]

Khwartz cannot know that.  It's pure speculation on his part.
See for yourself - my first message in this thread is here.
Note that I had made only technical questions and statements in this thread, without any personal remarks.

As a matter of principle, opposition and criticism of technical ideas is not wrong scientifically and is in accordance with the scientific nature of this forum,
...but wait, I have not even criticized Khwartz or his ideas in this thread - I just pointed out a numerical inaccuracy and asked him some apparently inconvenient questions, to which he did not reply.

If I wanted to get rid of Khwartz, I could have him banned from this forum for misconduct with one PM to Stefan (see forum's rules).

...but I am not going to go that tattletale route.  Instead I am going to point out that the equation:
P_AVERAGE = U_RMS * I_RMS * cos(Φ)

is valid only for pure sine waves.

If the continuous Out/In power ratio is really >2 then it should be possible to loop that power and achieve a self-runner within a month.

If that does not happen soon, then the methodology of power measurements will have to be reavaluated, e.g. because:
1) Waveform shapes
2) Crest factors
3) any DC components
4) Quantization errors of ADCs
5) The maximum frequency rating of the RMS or U*I multiplier.
6) The relationship between the sampling rate and the maximum frequency content of the measured signal.
7) Resistance and inductance of current sensing resistors or the frequency response of magnetic current probes,
8) The position of the voltage probe in relation to the current sensing element (before/after).
9) Stray capacitances
10) EMI
...etc.

I said I will no more comment your posts. Troll an other thread!

[Khwartz]

For open heart  visitors only:

Know that verpies is NEAR true about the "inaccuracy" of the formulas:

P = U * I * cos (phi)

for non-pure sinus waves.

What he very "forgets" is that the RANGE of the COP is not of 1.2 or 1.3, where we could have some doubts, but of more than 2.0 (200%).

One who knows about oscilloscope traces and shape of the waves, will see by visual on the oscilloscope screen the ORDER OF MAGNITUDE of the integral of the curve, the measure of the "surface" of the shape of the wave.

Anyway, whatever kind of measurement has been used since, THE ORDER OF MAGNITUDE OF THE COPs has been fully confirmed, would be by oscilloscopes, would be by HF WATTMEATERS, and would be by INTRAGRATION OF ANY POINT OF THE CURVES, so been so accurate that we calculate for each very thiny peace of time the actual real power we get.

For information, the self loop have been already made in laboratory, but as used to, verpies HAS NOT TIME TO REALLY READ MY POSTS OR TRULY STUDY THE SUBJECT BEFORE TO SPEAK,  BUT SURE HE HAS TIME FOR CRITICISM AND TAKING OTHERS FOR MORE IDIOTIC THAN THEY ARE... and he is still only interested in trying to discourage anyone to have interest in Richard's works (I don't know if he is even aware of his own intentions but this is very what I can perceive like outload from him; notice he is the inly one from who I could perceive anything like that.)

[Khwartz]

@Khwartz
Does it exist a more effecient version than the "U" shape one?
Do you know what happen with JLN? His site have no update since a while... .  ?

The U shape allows negative COP, means in addition to feed a load it can feed the power supply too which becomes a receiver. It is more than than infinite efficiency,  so imo hard to do better

Now, what we are looking for is no more the overunity we have achieved since long, but greatter power reproduced at will and fully predictable.

There is BTW a few variation of, like the one with ferrites which looks to better concentrate the magnetic flux of the coil in the core, while it is a very important principle in this device the core be fully magnetically induced at maximum by the coil magnetic flux.

The U shape has just the very advantage to take less place than if 1 m straight and shorten the wires of connection.

A circular one can be made too; no significant difference in its behaviour has been detected as I could know until now.

You can even make several spirals of, it will take even less space.

Then know that the 1 m Richard's Autogenerator should produce up to 6 kW, according to Richard theory but needs to be reproduced at will, and true that the models of calculations needs to be improved to be more accurate.

Hope this has helped you, dear wistiti, and thanks for your interest

[Khwartz]

As I couldn't connect back to cos.com to check if my post was fully OK, I post it here in double, but it is many for the Frenches :
; )

-----
Hi All!

I have tried to contact Selfonlypath, a French Youtuber I know for his great interest in ZPE Quest, for his very high professional  skills in electronics, and mostly for the "selftrigging system" he has developed with others skilled partners on internet.

He was no more reachable on Yotube nor on his web site :/

Lucky enough, a post I made in the thread in ou.com grants us of a PM from Tagor. He gave me news about Selfonlypath.

Here my answer to Tagor wishing he could reach him  (WARNING: it is not because I have talked about PROMTECNO that it obliges anyone in anything, these are only suggestions and ideas I post here so everyone here could react and give one's thought...):

-----

Hi Tagor.

So very thanks for giving news from [Selfonlypath].

Even if we were not always on the same wave length, may I say, I mostly respect the so very nice and very professional job he made  in zpe researches.

If I had the means I would employ him in this activity.

PROMTECNO would need his professional skills in electronics and is very brilliant selftrigging system for having an automatic search system for keeping tuned with the best Richard's frequency in real time, so selftrigging while the power increase in the Richard's Autogenerator.

You know we have already overunity but we miss the expertise in electronics to acheive systematic results for higher power.

My suggestion would be that [Selfonlypath] rents his time and skill to PROMTECNO, like been "auto-entrepreneur" or "salarié porté" (independent worker but with no engagement and necessicity of minimum  income to function and very easy to manage - he may call me +336 XX XX XX XX - if he want any advise, I have helped several already to have their own activity and I am independent worker too...).

An other idea: I AM SURE HE HAS ALL THE SKILL AND TOOLS WE NEED TO OBTAIN THE ENOUGH POWERFUL AND MASTERED AUTOGENERATOR UP TO POWER HOMES AND SO ON, why not having an agreement (in addition to the previous) he would be emploied in a company the association PROMTECNO would create as a non profit trust? He would have a salary and in a very constructive activity i know he is passionate for. What do you think?

Best regards,
Didier.

PS: I will publish this message in Conspirovniscience, having [Selfonlypath] first name hidden and replace by his nickname, so that the other members of PROMTECNO could express their own thoughts...

[tagor]

Lucky enough, a post I made in the thread in ou.com grants us of a PM from Tagor. He gave me news about Selfonlypath.

from Dan Combine on evgray

To all,

no, I contacted him recently, and he is still unemployed, no investors, nothing.
As he is still unemployed, he cannot continue the ZPE research anymore due to funding issues.
He has put all his videos private, until better opportunities arise.


Note that he is a well respected PhD that got layed off due to company restructuring (crisis etc.).
He has spend 1.5 years full-time on ZPE research, but one day you need to pull the trigger, to maintain a living.
He is now trying to find a senior engineering job, to re-enable an income.
Note also that he is a tantrik yogi. He cannot lie, nor cheat, nor can be greedy. I thought this was important to mention!

-Dan

you need to contact him