Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity

[Khwartz]

@tim

Nice to see you just go forward, and far further I can go in electronics   

That's very great imo cause we do need these skills

Nice to see you "manipulating directly the material" and see what you can obtain from Richard's autogenerator.




@ wisttiti

Nice to know it could have helped you and you are very welcomed for my time

For JNL, I will try to ask on cos.com if any knows.

Bien amicalement...




@ All (except verpies )

Still verpies continue to take the Frenches who work on this device, more idiotic than they are and continue to not truly read obsviously the already published data I have summarised here; about which he looks been THE ONLY ONE having "so much" difficulties with my bad english

Well, I have no doubt on his knowledge and skills in electronics, that I far to have and that I even not making of any claim on that point. But still he can't face he only works with the idea that we couldn't have thought to his own objections! I am sure he will experience a big realise, the time he will do

In the cos.com community (Conspirovniscience.com community), I have seen many guys coming to help someone in one's replication. It could be to encourage but it could be to correct any point, suggest other veryfications, nor been agree with the results, but I never seen someone yet coming with his big feet to only notice possible outpoints or needs for improvement,  and most of all: without outlining the positive points; do you see what I mean?

The funny things is: far to destabilise me, verpies does help me much! You don't believe it? I'll tell you: I was wishing he comes here because I know his background in electronics and physics in general. Reacting he gives much interesting data and notes that I can use to help the community

My job is mainly the one of a reporter here, just here to spread the available data on a device, I think and been not alone to think so, very very promising and the present actual better candidate  for a futur home green power supply; while I can garanty you I have been following much other candidates, here and on other communities (see my YouTube channel, for example).

All the problem was that Pascuser made, imho, the very comprehensive mistake to title and present the subject mainly on his theoretical aspects, and that Woppy didn't continue to publish his replication in this thread but in the French forum, not allowing the community here which hears nothing to the French language to see "by there own eyes", may I say, the results, the measurements and the calculations of the experiments, and this in real time. I think this is what missing the most.

So I am glad from you tim you decided to go on a replication. I am afraid I won't be able to go so far that you intend to go, with better tools I will never have

Hope you, wistiti, you will find some spare time too

BTW, I was continuing to go through the replication thread of Colas07 which has became a true research thread.

There are many interesting data and I will try to compile or summerise them when I will have complete its study. In a way, the very advantage you will have then by reading me, is that you won't need to go through yourself unproductive tries but you will have the most condensed compilation of actions of success (and could be of unsuccessful paths, but knowing already they have been unsuccessful).

Just to note that if I've talked about the first results of Colas been at the very beginning of 2013, I remember anyone here, there have been registred negative COP, not just 2.6, not just 35, not just INFINITE, but even NEGATIVE COP (the device feeding both the load and the power supply), and this checked by different means.

For those who are enough deficient to not understand my bad english, I remember too that I have already talked about the case of the laboratory and why we can't show the results and why we need enough trained in  electronics (but construcrive minds only ) to reproduce it, while 2 persons at least has testified of the acheivements of the laboratory, of engineer working months full time on the device with huge means in terms of equipments and an unlimited budget.

We, from cos.com, wish that the spirit of community will succeed by the sharing of data and means, to do has well and even better than the laboratory had done.

The good news is: since their own experiments, many progresses have been done on the mastering of the device. I think we are indeed very closed to fully master "the beast"

I will continue to do my best to share the informations I could collect from your Frenches buddies; despite any attemp to discourage me to do so

Anyway, if I no more do, I think others can take already the relay now. It was my job to catch attention on this device and I did so, so now I could even retreat! but I won't do this pleasure to my contradictor cause here it isn't just about "my little ideas" ; right? 

[verpies]

I followed the instructions here for testing a mosfet, and they both failed the test...
http://www.utm.edu/staff/leeb/mostest.htm
Can anyone tell me if there's anything wrong with the above test?

Yes, the voltage applied to the gate by some multimeters might be insufficient to turn it on.
Also, the gate junction will not hold the charge after the multimeter is disconnected from some transistors with integrated resistors or heavy gate protections.

Or is there another test?

I'd recommend the following test for enhancement mode MOSFETs.
In case a multimeter is not available, you can use a second battery with a light bulb in series, instead of the meter.
The 10kΩ resistor is for safety only (in case the pins of the MOSFET are mixed up) and unmistakeable people can omit it.

[e2matrix]

verpies and Khwartz,   I know both of you are good people just trying to get to the truth of free energy.   Please don't let yourselves get stuck in a self running loop of misunderstandings and worse     I think much of the problems are from language (and sometimes the associated differences in general expression).   Lets don't let this thread turn in to a flame war.   It's some very good info and work going on here.   I bought some components in hopes of trying some things with this myself.   I just need to go back to understand how to make the U shaped coil and I'll be ready for some experiments.    Cheers

[verpies]

Despite what Khwartz thinks, I'd like the Vialle's circuit to have COP > 1, too.
I just don't want it to be another HF power measurement error.

[Khwartz]

To answer shortly about measurements:

I have asked on cos.com about the verpies's list, it has been found not long enough!   

Indeed, zgreudz is electronic engineer and runs a whole engineering office, do you know about what? About measurements!   ^10

Now, PascUser, Master in physics, confirms that in most of the case all these tools are  not needed, like while we take the signal out of an enough quality amplifier of pure sinus waves. Isn't what verpies said that the formula P = U . I . Cos (pho) "only", so does apply in case of pure sinus waves?

Anyway, only 1 kind of critics are accepted in the cos.com community regarding replications: the ones which

a) explain "why" exactly there is a problem;

b) gives the solution with appropriate schematics and the justification of ots accuracy.


I will see in my means it could run the same way here.


BTW thanks for your help, dear verpies: thanks to you I have learnt much more about measurements and great you have answered tim, woth schematics and explainations.

But please, cease to take the systematic point of view that, us, Frenches, we do not know what we are doing; like your said "capa phenomenon", I have checked, it has been well studied alteady, I can tell you in details.

Sorry but indeed, I can't just translate like that all the materials of the French community.

I can understand that extraordinary claims needs extraordinary proves, but please, let me the time to go through all these materials! 

I try first to be synthetic, to summaries, not expect me to go in all details!

Replications should be run here, so you will have the occasion to constructively criticise these replications, questioning the results and I hope proposoting the solutions to make better, otherwise it is me who will ask Stefan to banish YOU, from here, for trolling this thread...