Probality of God

[ramset]

Snicker.........
Sorry about that W, I was not really sure about your feelings for your fellow man.
I will add however that your feelings [how you stand on addiction and youth] will be important for you to have any credibility whatsoever in this Peer reviewd discusion we are having.

You see the science of the mind is a relatively new Hobby of Men,[of course religious atrocities aside]
It has its most recent roots during the time period of  member @ghosts
book PDF. around the same Time the 12 step program started [almost to the year ]

But ,I really have to get to work on my Open source Ou faither Thingy
which BTW I may ask for your help with at some point.

Sorry for behaving so "uppity" it was a cheap shot [the people like you thing]

but if your going to play "the probability of God " game.
you don't get to make _ALL_ the rules.
[this isn't one of our poker games].

be back MUCH later.........

thx
Chet

[WilbyInebriated]

Snicker.........
Sorry about that W, I was not really sure about your feelings for your fellow man.
I will add however that your feelings [how you stand on addiction and youth] will be important for you to have any credibility whatsoever in this Peer reviewd discusion we are having.

You see the science of the mind is a relatively new Hobby of Men,[of course religious atrocities aside]
It has its most recent roots during the time period of  member @ghosts
book PDF. around the same Time the 12 step program started [almost to the year ]

But ,I really have to get to work on my Open source Ou faither Thingy
which BTW I may ask for your help with at some point.

Sorry for behaving so "uppity" it was a cheap shot [the people like you thing]

but if your going to play "the probability of God " game.
you don't get to make _ALL_ the rules.
[this isn't one of our poker games].

be back MUCH later.........

thx
Chet

you didn't provide your methods for falsifying all the other gods chetty the cheerleader... nor did you provide the method used to validate yours... 

your entire response is just another one of your usual red herring logical fallacies. you are no different than tito the clown you dunce.

thank you for ANOTHER tacit admission you don't have a single shred of extant material evidence nor a logical proof for the existence of your imaginary godfairy savior friend.


your apology is NOT accepted... and don't bother to ask me for help with ANYTHING.

[ramset]

W

I am a bit weak in the Falsify department, as a matter of fact I have never once gone there ,and always encourage people to do "what works for them".

regarding the "proof" part
Please give 5 examples that would satisfy your request .

And please flavor them differently.

Thx

Chester
PS
Of Course you are not required to except my apology, I am however Required to offer it.
thats How I roll now.............

[WilbyInebriated]

you didn't provide your methods for falsifying all the other gods chetito... nor did you provide the method used to validate yours... 

your entire response is just another one of your usual red herring logical fallacies. you are no different than tito the clown you dunce.

thank you for ANOTHER tacit admission you don't have a single shred of extant material evidence nor a logical proof for the existence of your imaginary godfairy savior friend.

I am a bit weak in the Falsify department, as a matter of fact I have never once gone there ,and always encourage people to do "what works for them".

chetito... that's because you haven't a clue as to what constitutes the scientific method...

regarding the "proof" part
Please give 5 examples that would satisfy your request .

bring your imaginary godfairy savior friend over for bbq on fri.  sept. 21 2012... we can have some eats and then your godfairy can create a rock (from nothing) that is too heavy to lift... and then your godfairy can lift said rock. do that and i'll bend my knee.

until then... the ahh... the idea of kneeling, it's... you see, logically kicking the shit out of all your asinine, fantastical claims has left a nasty cramp in my leg... so kneeling will be hard for me...

PS
Of Course you are not required to except my apology, I am however Required to offer it.
thats How I roll now.............

i hold your sins bound. that's how i roll now...

[WilbyInebriated]

from the wiki...

Within the philosophy of science falsifiability or refutability is a quality or characteristic of a scientific hypothesis or theory. Falsifiability is considered a positive (and often essential) quality of a hypothesis because it means that the hypothesis is testable by empirical experiment and thus conforms to the standards of scientific method. That something is "falsifiable" does not mean it is false, rather it means that if it is false, then observation or experiment will at some point demonstrate its falsehood.

"Falsifiable" is often taken to loosely mean "testable." A common application or usage put loosely is if it's not falsifiable, then it's not scientific.


so faithers... once again, what methods did you use to falsify all the 2500+ gods that humanity has created and what method did you use to validate yours?


no takers yet??  imagine that!