Probality of God

[Neo-X]

How old are you two? Im 28 yrs old so im expecting that you two are much younger than me..

[WilbyInebriated]

And that last one, considering you claim that you dont believe there is a God, how could he have told you this? Or did you just make that up in your silly little mind? If so, then that statement could be libelous or even slander.
Or is that just more sarcasm?

mags the religulous godtard bully returns to bully some more...
still bent on assassinating someones character INSTEAD OF PRESENTING A SINGLE SHRED OF EVIDENCE FOR YOUR GODFAIRY...  how christian of you.
we've been over this before you godtard. all of that was me obeying your holey babble... that was me doing unto you zealots as you have done unto others... try being less of a fucking hypocrite...

slander and libel of your imaginary godfairy...  yup. you belong in an institution.

do you really think the opinion of a moronic godbot like you means anything to me mags?


now... once again you insane godbot troll... please present the methods you used to falsify all the other gawds humanity has created and then present the methods you used to validate your gawd. i would like to compare and contrast as well as offer peer review.

thank you for your cooperation.

[WilbyInebriated]

hey eatenbyagrue...  what did you think? too subtle?  i think i need to ramp it up a notch or two... it's obvious the lunatic godtards still don't get it.  what say you oh torchless one?

[Neo-X]

if it has no supporting
evidence... that would be a
hypothesis. you're 28? and
you don't even know what
a theory is?

--End of Quote--

English is not my native
language. Im good only
when reading but in
speaking im really bad. You
will notice that almost all my
post are edited and im not speak too much.

[eatenbyagrue]

hey eatenbyagrue...  what did you think? too subtle?  i think i need to ramp it up a notch or two... it's obvious the lunatic godtards still don't get it.  what say you oh torchless one?

Here is what I think.  I think the theists on this board are not equipped or motivated to defend their positions on scientific grounds. They believe because they strongly want to believe, and all evidence gets filtered through this prism.  Religious faith started way before the scientific method, and its self-justification has persisted and efforts to subject religious beliefs to scientific scrutiny are going to be resisted by the adherents.  And this being a message board, and not a direct face-to-face debate, it's just too easy to ignore what the other guy says and spout your own stuff, so this is a poor medium for this discussion, especially when the sides cannot even agree on the rules of engagement.


But I am also beginning to see why there are so many religious people on an overunity forum.  Overunity research (along with theories on chemtrails, moon landing hoax, 9/11 "truth", etc.) seems to attract people eagerly willing to suspend reason.