Probality of God

[eatenbyagrue]

Actually it was a very serious question.

Here is another serious question. If they diversified 'over time' then how did they differentiate themselves in the early to mid periods of development in order to develop diverse cultures to begin with? ?? Why did they not just all of them grow into the same culture? Because they gradually, over what ever period of time you figure, changed physical appearance.

With this kind of growing diversity over great periods of time, change in color and, what we call now, nationality, when exactly did they all separate to their own countries?

I would think that if cultural diversity happened gradually as you suggest, that mixing in the early to mid stages would make it impossible for concise diversity to come about.
And then later on, all of the blacks, whites, yellows, reds, just finally had it with each other and separated? 

Are you serious??     They got along for all that time as they slowly changed, mixing and mixing along the way because they couldnt tell each other apart? And that caused concise diversity??? 

I am not belittling you.  But you have to understand where Im coming from, dont you?

Mags

You leave me with the terrible impression of someone who has not even studied basic anthropology.  All these questions have been thoroughly answered.  This is like someone laying out alternate answers to the multiplication tables.  I do not even want to begin to try to educate you on this, because I do not have time to start at such an early stage of discussions.

[hoptoad]

snip..
This happened exactly the same way that Latin dialects formed into Italian, French, Spanish, Portuguese, and Romanian, for example.

The documented evidence for this linguistic evolution abounds and includes the early bible (written in Latin long before King James was born).
The metamorphosis from Latin to the languages you've mentioned have all occurred within modern historical times. That is, the last 2000 years.

[Magluvin]

You leave me with the terrible impression of someone who has not even studied basic anthropology.  All these questions have been thoroughly answered.  This is like someone laying out alternate answers to the multiplication tables.  I do not even want to begin to try to educate you on this, because I do not have time to start at such an early stage of discussions.

Oh I know of it. Again, you are believing in science written by men, yet since the Bible is written by men it must be a fairy tale. 

Magzimus Leviticus

[hoptoad]

Oh I know of it. Again, you are believing in science written by men, yet since the Bible is written by men it must be a fairy tale. 

Magzimus Leviticus

Now your getting it! Science was written and will continue to be written by men. Men who accept they may be right or they may be wrong.
Science doesn't pretend to know all the questions let alone know all the answers.

The bible is also written by men, and interpreted by some who think it presents all the questions and all the answers, and their interpretation couldn't possibly be wrong.

[Magluvin]

Now your getting it! Science was written and will continue to be written by men. Men who accept they may be right or they may be wrong.
Science doesn't pretend to know all the questions let alone know all the answers.

The bible is also written by men, and interpreted by some who think it presents all the questions and all the answers, and their interpretation couldn't possibly be wrong.

Thats just it Hoppy. If what you said above is what you believe, then why are you hopping on us for having our belief as if it 'is' fairy tales?

Im into science. I dont believe it all. I have interests in technology. But I dont like everything it is being used for.

Magzimus Leviticus