Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[Hoppy]

Hoppy i wish you the best.
Thank you for your kind participation.

Wesley

And to you Wesley. I hope the dots join up for you one day. 

[AlienGrey]

Have a look at this one;--

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fZT7PvEGKU

[nelsonrochaa]

The subject of this discussion is nothing to do with whether you or I can or cannot light a 600W bulb to full brightness with just 1W. Because the Three Musketeers cannot backup their claim of OU with recorded input and output power measurements taken whilst testing the device, they cannot provide any evidence that the bulb was lit to the observed level with anything other than conventional electrical energy. Simply quoting the specified output power level of the FG as proof that the bulb could not have been powered at the observed level with conventional electricity is just not good enough for guys with their technical ability.

These putting into question the veracity of the work that led Wesley with his team?
They will not have the your equivalent competences in order to validate the result of the work?
It seems so . But seems you are able and way ?

  Now place into question the issue of veracity to connect a lamp 600w with 1 watt, and you need measurements?
It does not seem the best choice for you to be righteous and defend your point of view.
But is only a opinion

[scratchrobot]

The subject of this discussion is nothing to do with whether you or I can or cannot light a 600W bulb to full brightness with just 1W. Because the Three Musketeers cannot backup their claim of OU with recorded input and output power measurements taken whilst testing the device, they cannot provide any evidence that the bulb was lit to the observed level with anything other than conventional electrical energy. Simply quoting the specified output power level of the FG as proof that the bulb could not have been powered at the observed level with conventional electricity is just not good enough for guys with their technical ability.

Hoopy you act like a little kid, don't fight it, you know they are right.
Why post nonsense?
Bye Bye.

[scratchrobot]

That is exactly right. A claimant CANNOT simply use the nameplate rating of a bulb or other load to claim a power output value. The claimant MUST use proper measurements of bulb brightness, voltage, current and waveform in order to have a valid power output value. We often have seen people who should know better --- and perhaps they do know better --- showing some bulbs lit up feebly while shouting "Look! 600 Watts" ! simply because that's what it says on the bulb labels. This is so wrong it isn't even funny any more... it's downright dishonest.

Next, the BNC connector Shields of most FGs are connected to the chassis and back to the Mains supply ground pin. It is trivial , when using two FGs that are Mains powered, to arrange to have the full Mains voltage appear between the BNC shields of the two FGs, simply by switching two wires of the Mains supply to one of the FGs. It can even be done inside the wall socket that supplies one of the FGs. This is an easy way to sneak full Mains power into any system that uses 2 FGs. It creates a shock hazard and a hazard to the devices themselves but is easily done and if done deliberately and with care, not dangerous.

Furthermore, any system that truly puts out more electrical power than it takes to run it, should be able to be "daisy chained" with other identical devices. That is, if you have some system that is putting out 600 Watts of power and it only takes one or ten or 14 watts to run it, you should be able to connect another one or several identical devices as the "load" of the first device, and run them off of the output of the first device, with power left over to run a load. Several stages... MANY stages of identical devices should be daisy chained, all running only on the input power to the very first device. Yet you will _never_ see any demonstrations like this from OU claimants such as those who claim 600 Watts output from 14 watts input. Why not? I know why... and so do you.

Finally (for now) it is easy and common to underestimate the power that can be sent through very thin, nearly invisible wires, especially HV and high frequency. Most of the YT video demonstrations of excess power output could be easily faked by using thin wires that don't show up under the poor resolution and bad camera work of these video demonstrations.

Some people are so hopeful and so trusting that they will refuse even to consider how a device could be made to work using trickery. They will come up with all kinds of reasons for why you can't daisy-chain two or three identical devices so that they all run on the input to the first one only. These feeble excuses do not hold water.

For your amusement: Cheese Power.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Frp03muquAo

WOW    can you share the circuit u used?, all that trouble to make that video! This must be real.
Did you experience side effects while performing the tests?
Did you make this device yourself or with the team?
Did you use American components or just cheep Chinees components?