Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

verpies

Quote from: NickZ on February 03, 2016, 10:45:58 AM
It may be unimportant how the proper signal is generated, but, the meaning of what is actually a "proper signal", is still a very illusive term, or idea.
Absolutely

Quote from: NickZ on February 03, 2016, 10:45:58 AM
As well as just how to generate that signal "properly". 
If I knew what a proper signal was, I could design a cheap circuit to generate it with several CMOS chips and op-amps ...or with a modulateable signal generator, if the target audience had one.

Quote from: NickZ on February 03, 2016, 10:45:58 AM
I also feel that what you are mentioning is in theory how it should be. But is it, really? In the case of the Ruslan/Akula devices.
Signal generation really is.  Its interaction of the signal in the grenade with other signals - is not easy to predict.

Quote from: NickZ on February 03, 2016, 10:45:58 AM
To test the idea, I built up my Mazilli/yoke/grenade/Kacher combination. 
Mazilli is a difficult to control beast.  I think that's why some people call it Mazilla akin to Godzilla ;)
It is not frequency stable, not to mention phase...
Any system based on it is likely to be very touchy and finicky.

Quote from: NickZ on February 03, 2016, 10:45:58 AM
BTW:  I feel that the yoke/grenade coils are neither a donor, or producer, or even having anything to do with NMR.
But, it is something similar to a transmitter/receiver, device instead. 
It does not matter for engineering purposes whether the "magic" happens inside the yoke/grenade or outside of it because the yoke/grenade are the last components in the chain of components, that probes can be attached to and measured.  Even if the yoke/grenade receive some magic smoke from the "ambient" they will still appear as the donor to the measuring equipment ...and to the load.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I can see people struggling with generating simple signals instead of concentrating on the yoke/grenade interactions.  I think it would be advantageous to design a stable and easily tunable signal generating circuit for the guys that will give them the freedom to apply any desired signals to the yoke/grenade, just like I did for the motor flyback recovery experiments of Tinman/Gotoluc and Itsu.

Does anyone know what is desired ?



P.S.
Where a parallel LC resonance must be be maintained in this system?
Also, must the VSWR be minimized as in a transmitter/receiver pair ...or maximized as in a TeslaCoil.  Where exactly in this system, should the VSWR be minimized or maximized?

Hoppy

Quote from: AlienGrey on February 03, 2016, 10:47:21 AM
Long wave aerial rods, had a pile of them to play with my self, they are strange in swome ways, you can get them at Maplin Electronics for 2 or 3 squid ;) think they have loads of them.

Hi Alien,

You would need rods from the 1950 - 1960's. Modern rods are not made of barium ferrite.

NickZ

  Verpies:
   Here's a video (below) that I made a while back, although some of the guys here have seen it, but as it is showing some unusual effects, I thought that you might like to see it, also, if you haven't. I don't know if it's magic smoke, or what.
   The video will show what my set up was like, previous to switching to the 24v yoke/induction coil circuit that I'm using now.
   The picture is of my cat, at the end of a hard night on Nick's bench.
   My video:
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlDAP9KtnkQ

   

NickZ

  Verpies:
  I think that Itsu can possibly best answer some of the questions that you are asking about. Or, at least the theory of it all, as no one knows for sure or exactly how these Ruslan versions of the Akula device are really supposed to work. And none of us have found the proper sync, to see any extra energy out.  At least not yet.

   BTW: It's great to have you here, and offering to get involved.  It's never too late.
                                                                       

   
   

Void

Quote from: T-1000 on February 03, 2016, 04:29:18 AM
There was key materials in yoke composition what was reacting to EM radio frequency radiation exposure. The few common between yoke and http://www.rexresearch.com/colman/colman.htm was Cobalt and Barium.
If you would like to understand what we done with NMR, I suggest studying on MRI scans used in materials identification - http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/mri.html
Just we did expose material on higher energy level on resonant approach (which made energy consumption levels watts, not kilowatts) and this is what made things happen. This is also fundamental method what akula was talking about in his different devices. In one case it is core, in another case it is wire itself.
If you will pursue that on the yoke, have it in radiation isolating container. It will emit beta/gama radiation if you will manage to replicate effect.

Hi T-1000. Thanks for the info. For now, my focus is on trying to replicate as reasonably close as I can your Lithuania experiment setup in which you guys
made use of the ferrite yoke core.  I have a yoke core of what appears to be about the same size, although I can't say if the material composition
is close or the same as the yoke core you guys used. I have previously posted the markings on my yoke core.

Yes, I saw Wesley's warning that some participants suffered some ill effects and that this setup might possibly generate radiation.
If I start to see any unusual effects such as over unity with this setup, I may possibly invest in a small portable geiger counter to measure
radiation levels. However, for now my focus will be on just trying to replicate the setup you guys used.

I have a few questions on the yoke core experiment setup, if you have a few minutes at some point.

1)
Were you able to see the over unity effect with no high voltage spark gap discharges applied to the horizontal
winding wrap of copper strap around one half of the yoke core? My understanding is that you were able to see
the over unity effect without these HV discharges applied, but at lower power levels. Just want to confirm this point.

2)
Should I place the horizontal copper strap wrap underneath the two vertically wound primary windings, or underneath
the output vertically wound bifilar winding?

3)
Were you able to see the over unity effect with no earth ground connection to any of the windings or light bulb load?
Were you able to see the overunity effect with no scope probe leads connected to any of the windings?
Just want to understand if an earth ground connection might have been a factor when you were seeing over unity.

4)
I think I know the answer to this, but I just want to make sure I am clear about this.
Is the output bifilar winding connected with the two bifilar winding sections connected such that their
inductance is additive (non-cancelling) or were the two halves connected with the winding inductances cancelling?

The schematic says 150 turns. Does this mean the total turns of both bifilar windings included together?

5)
The schematic posted by Wesley shows capacitors were connected in parallel to the output bifilar windings.
What total capacitance value was used when you were seeing overunity, and what was the intended purpose for these capacitors?
Was the total capacitance value chosen for resonance with the output windings at some particular frequency? If so, what frequency were
you aiming for as the resonance frequency?

I have attached the schematic I intend to follow which is taken from Wesley's video.
If you have any other tips regarding the setup, I would appreciate the feedback.


All the best...