Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[Void]

akula always have approach from the NMR point of view. Also he frequently is referring to Lithuania Yoke experiment when explaining about tuning, etc.
In regards to Ruslan and akula relationship they are not on best opinion on each other and feels more competitors who do not like each other.
But both of them are referring for making standing wave and making electrons move on bucking coil of grenade.

Hi T-1000. Ok, that is very interesting indeed. That puts a whole different spin on this type of
setup then (pun intended ). We seem to back to square one.

[T-1000]

Yes, this is indeed a good question for T1000 to ask Akula. Also, has Akula actually told T1000 that he has achieved overunity with his device. We see video demonstrations suggesting that this is the case but has he confirmed this to T1000? T1000 wrote earlier:-

"After few hours with changing coils connections and frustration I made call to akula and asked how he was tuning his version of device. It turned out he is using 28-30T yoke winding to power Tesla coil and the grenade coil output is going directly to the load. Also he is trying to get standing wave with reflection from the ground under end of grenade and the resonant harmonic frequencies are in range with electrons movement Larmor frequencies. Which makes electrons push for the gain in the output."

This statement is saying that akula has not yet achieved a standing wave situation. It was my understanding that this was necessary to achieve a self-running situation which equals overunity, so has Akula really achieved this??

It was me with under unity on the current setup. akula had over unity for long enough time already with multiple devices. Just obviously it is highly experimental stuff so still not reached consumers like you.

[itsu]

I made some measurements on the inductor coil, see screenshot 1 and the grenade output, see screenshot 2


Screenshot 1 shows a nice sine wave from the series LC resonance across the coil with a slight hickup on tops and bottoms.
This is probably due to the push pull square wave driving it.
I put the nano-pulse exactly on top of this top hickup, and then there is some interaction going on, like
a slight flickering of the 40W bulb connected to the grenade (via a bridge rectifier) and the input current is also fluctuating.

By the way, all is being driven from one 24V battery stack (5/6A)

Screenshot 2 shows a not so nice squarisch ringing signal.   
Not sure where that squarisch comes from as it should mostly get its input inductively from the inductor coil which as we see has a nice sine wave.
I measure on the input sides (AC side) of the FWBR.
The superimposed ringing (500/600KHz) probably is the grenades own self resonance or subharmonic as it is there with or without the nano-pulser active.
I still have the 28 turn secondary from the yoke connected in series with the grenade/FWBR.

No grounds are used other then the HV probe ground.

Itsu

[Void]

Screenshot 2 shows a not so nice squarisch ringing signal.   
Not sure where that squarisch comes from as it should mostly get its input inductively from the inductor coil which as we see has a nice sine wave.
I measure on the input sides (AC side) of the FWBR.
The superimposed ringing (500/600KHz) probably is the grenades own self resonance or subharmonic as it is there with or without the nano-pulser active.
I still have the 28 turn secondary from the yoke connected in series with the grenade/FWBR.
No grounds are used other then the HV probe ground.
Itsu

Hi Itsu. If you are measuring the waveform on the AC side of the output FWBR, I would think that when the
diodes are conducting current though the light bulb load that this is squaring off the top of the sinewave coming
from the grenade coil. If you disconnect the light bulb, the waveform should look more like a sinewave
if this is the case.

[itsu]

Hi void,

thats correct, see screenshot of the grenade output without a load bulb.

Itsu