Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[AlienGrey]

Good work Nick
Those schematics that are posted here are an absolute mess.

Re Scope shots

To me it looks like sine wave modulation, in one shot you can see where one sine wave looses part of the wave and is cut off.

I'm not sure if that shape works (produces phenomena) ? you tell me, I think we are looking for a 'compression of time and space like a flat 'Skate' fish shape like a kind of pulsing effect perhaps.
Where I would expect a sudden increase in current draw in energy perhaps.

Just because it's a mess doesn't mean anything concerning the end product.

[T-1000]

Re Scope shots

To me it looks like sine wave modulation, in one shot you can see where one sine wave looses part of the wave and is cut off.

I'm not sure if that shape works (produces phenomena) ? you tell me, I think we are looking for a 'compression of time and space like a flat 'Skate' fish shape like a kind of pulsing effect perhaps.
Where I would expect a sudden increase in current draw in energy perhaps.

Just because it's a mess doesn't mean anything concerning the end product.

The scope shots in working setups are showing standing waves. Please see http://telecom-hyb.blogspot.de/2016/08/vswr-stands-for-voltage-standing-wave.html for explanation in detail about standing waves.

[verpies]

I have attached a few scope shots from a PLL (phase lock loop) circuit ...

See Itsu's video of a similar circuit below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgtnWuuCMDI


^{NOTE: This is not a FE circuit..}

[sparkmen]

hi all, sorry if is not the right place  to ask, I've made the circuit as attached and when using "earth" connection to mentioned point , battery draw is almost 4 time less
voltmeter is across 0.16ohm /2w resistor. I can sense the difference in consumption by touchin the resistor, getting hot.
voltage across res without earth connection is 130 to 160mv( 0.8-1A) and when I connect the earthing is 35-50 mv.
not equiped with osciloscope to see the wave or freq, duty cycle is at minimum.
maybe someone can give me some clues on it?

[lost_bro]

lost_bro,

here i use my old method of determining the resonance frequencies of the grenade.
I have my FG loosly coupled with the grenade by a cliplead wire wrapped 2 turns on the thickest part of the grenade
I sweep the FG in 10s from 10Khz to 10MHz, so we see on the scope this frequency range at 1Mhz /div.

It shows roughly the same dips as with the SA, but now as amplitude peaks at 950Khz, 1.7Mhz and 2.6Mhz.

Moving the FG coupling point has some influence on these peaks, so i consider the SA method the better one.

Regards Itsu

Good Day Itsu

Yes, I have encountered the same *issue*.  The position of the _probe_ will affect the amplitude of and sometimes shift the resonant peaks.  Same with the position of the inductor winding............

I agree with you that the SA method using a Tracking Generator will give an uniform and integrated *picture* of the resonant points.  But, as mentioned above, positioning of the *Inductor winding* and for that matter it seems anything within the _near field_ of the Grenade will and does influence the resonant points.  So even when using the SA w/ TG, the *ultimate position of*, and *interaction with* any and all objects within the _near field_ cause a distortion of the virgin free space Fres (res. freq.).

Ruslan had mentioned, very long time ago, that the Grenade is a "Half wave Antenna @ 4Mhz"

I think a valid question would be:   Should the Fres of the Grenade be calculated and/or measured according to *free space* parameters, or should it include all *near_field* effects?

Anyone with access to a Spectrum Analyzer is going to see very rapidly that this *Grenade* is a virtual _can of worms_ to deal with.  I believe this is why there are so many different recommendations regarding how to wind it.

...................
I couldn't find the *modify* button either to correct my last post...........



take care, peace
lost_bro