Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[Void]

This shows the magnetic circuit, you have to do the experiment to comprehend
the effect Stvep is explains to us earlier on in the tread.

Hi AG. Actually there is nothing at all stopping a person from stating in a very clear
and specific way whether they see anything unusual or interesting in any particular
test setup, and stating clearly exactly why they think it is interesting or special.

I can't be the only person here who is getting very tired of people pretending to know 'deep
secrets' and making 'hints' about things when if they really see something unusual going
on in a particular test setup they can just simply state clearly what specifically they think is unusual.
Seeing a 'standing wave' in an AC circuit means really nothing special in itself. A pulsed tesla coil or even
just pulsing a long length of wire will have a standing wave formed across it too, but that alone means nothing
special at all.

If someone wants to contribute something, then just say it right out clearly what you want
to say. If you don't want to say anything, then don't say anything. People pretending to be privy
to 'OU secrets' but in reality not being able to show or explain anything that really shows anything
unusual is just getting to be way too much IMO... Unfortunately these forums are filled with
quite delusional people pretending to have 'inside OU knowledge' but typically not being able to
demonstrate or explain a single thing that really shows anything unusual or promising. Why is
this a problem? Because it can cause people to waste a lot of time trying to find some mysterious effect
claimed by someone when in reality typically there is nothing unusual going on there at all in
regards to actual relevance to OU.


All the best...

[AlienGrey]

.

[Void]

Hi Mr Void with respect I don't have the time to write several pages with other peoples diagrams
explain whats going on at rsonance or mathematically if two multiple numbers coincide with everything in the universe
Marco Rodine or R Feynman can do it far better.

I suj3st you go back to Stivens original cortical and research it for your self, if you can't or wont I respectfully suggest you
let others take the time and investigate it for them selves.
Regards
Allen

Hi AG. No one is asking anyone "to write several pages with other peoples diagrams
explain whats going on at rsonance or mathematically". There is absolutely no reason
whatsoever that if someone really has something which they think is relevant to 'OU' and they
want to share it that they can't explain it in a straightforward way in just a few sentences or paragraphs
or show the unusual effect very clearly in a test setup. Absolutely no reason whatsoever.
In fact, if a person can't do that, it is almost certain that they probably have nothing relevant to say or show.

Hey, I have this really cool OU effect on my test bench right now but I can't actually demonstrate anything
unusual that is going on to you, and I can't explain why I think it is unusual, but you should just 'get it'
unless you are blind...  This is of course just time wasting nonsense, and, if you think about it, it is of
no practical use to anyone at all.


Although Nelson did not want to come right out and explain things very specifically due to him wanting
to make money from his experimental findings, which is understandable, at least he was able to demonstrate
setups in his videos which did appear to possibly show very unusual results happening in his test setups. Likewise
for Kapanadze and Daly and Akula. Unfortunately I seem to be quite dumb when it comes to OU experimentation as I still
am not able to see the kind of apparent OU effects which people like Nelson Rocha and Kapanadze and Daly and Akula
have demonstrated in front of other people and/or in videos.


All the best...

[AlienGrey]

Hi AG. No one is asking anyone "to write several pages with other peoples diagrams
explain whats going on at rsonance or mathematically". There is absolutely no reason
whatsoever that if someone really has something which they think is relevant to 'OU' and they
want to share it that they can't explain it in a straightforward way in just a few sentences or paragraphs
or show the unusual effect very clearly in a test setup. Absolutely no reason whatsoever.
In fact, if a person can't do that, it is almost certain that they probably have nothing relevant to say or show.

Hey, I have this really cool OU effect on my test bench right now but I can't actually demonstrate anything
unusual that is going on to you, and I can't explain why I think it is unusual, but you should just 'get it'
unless you are blind...  This is of course just time wasting nonsense, and, if you think about it, it is of
no practical use to anyone at all.


Although Nelson did not want to come right out and explain things very specifically due to him wanting
to make money from his experimental findings, which is understandable, at least he was able to demonstrate
setups in his videos which did appear to possibly show very unusual results happening in his test setups. Likewise
for Kapanadze and Daly and Akula. Unfortunately I seem to be quite dumb when it comes to OU experimentation as I still
am not able to see the kind of apparent OU effects which people like Nelson Rocha and Kapanadze and Daly and Akula
have demonstrated in front of other people and/or in videos.


All the best...

Oh come on that's all I had until I started asking Russians and Lithuanians for help which i'm in deep gratitude for, It's very similar to Akulas porch lamp circuit i would imagine to drive it (i haven't yet) but i tried T1000 version
of winding the coil on a 'E and E ferrite' and get 'naff all') as the coil coincidence resonance exceeds over 5Mhz that's why you need to plug and play with it your self. 

[Void]

an inductance affect that's ignored by many, in more ways than one 

Plse note I don't have any more than the test I did, you point i'm trying to make is this.
YOU NEED TO MAKE AND DO THE TEST YOUR SELF, THEN IF YOU KNOW WHAT'S HAPPENING
YOU WILL BE ABLE TO PUT THE EFFECT TO GOOD USE, PERHAPS, PERHAPS NOT!

Hi AG, I disagree very strongly with what you are saying, as I have already explained.

If you think what you are seeing is quite unusual, then you should should be able to say clearly why.
Having unbalanced currents in parallel windings which are not balanced is an expected result,
not an unexpected result. All kinds of interesting and complex things happen in AC circuits,
so seeing standing waves and resonances and unbalanced currents, etc. is actually normal
in AC circuits. What effect specifically are you seeing that you think is relevant to to OU, and why?

Not being able to describe something specific which you think is relevant to OU, and telling people they
should test it them self if they want to know what is happening is a typical thing people say
in these forums when they actually have no idea them self whether something unusual
is going on or not.

I'll say it again. If someone thinks they are seeing something very unusual and possibly relevant
to OU in their tests, and they want to share it, then they should be able to describe or show that
effect very clearly and straight forward. If they can't or won't do so, then they most likely don't really
have anything truly unusual going on there. What I am saying should really go without saying. If this
is not already obvious to someone, then they are probably one of those people who are making hints
of knowing about 'OU effects, but never being able to describe or show anything unusual whatsoever.
I hope that is more clear now.


All the best...