Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[d3x0r]

I hadn't been watching for a while.
Here's lots of various people with various implementation of nanopulser (I think)
At least this guy (through google translator) (works better in chrome with just auto translate; sometimes downloads get mangled; altough the translator formats text better) has a board layout that looks good...

Results:
1. Belkin remake scheme under field researcher tapa P9NK60z (or irf840)
2. Rides driver type field researcher through the gate of the UCC 37322 Polevikov 10 ohm resistor.
On the cutter body 330 ohms. Before the door number 2 UCC 37322 cutter 5.1k into the ground to protect
(With no signal input)
3. Pulse formation time for UCC 37322 150ns do more sense NO! Your mother ...
4. Voltage supplied to Polevikov 160 volts DC.
NO more sense for this scheme. Shot nsec not get more.
5. Presses output nsec for a fee (in the post) has a protective bottom coprocessor
it clings oscillator and divider based naprugi have 1300 volts at 50 ohms.
6. If the pulse width at the output load is not less than 10 ns or 1000V, change one of the windings of the transformer places
7.'s It, baby ....

[NickZ]

  Hoppy:
  Can you please explain WHY a pulse modulator that is available for induction heater circuits is "not suitable", specifically for the Akula second device type set up.
What is the difference?  They have several different wattage type boards of these pulse controllers, and can also custom build to specs.
   I already have over 10 years experience in the electronics assembly business, and can certainly solder. But would rather just buy something which is available, relatively cheap and very well made. Than to have to buy expensive scopes, and take the needed time to make what can already be purchased.
  I also think that if we use ready made circuits, instead of home built one, we can all benefit from using what is known to work, without spending a lot of time experimenting with what doesn't. As NONE of the control circuits built by any one here have been shown to work for a self runner device, yet.

[Hoppy]

  Hoppy:
  Can you please explain WHY a pulse modulator that is available for induction heater circuits is "not suitable", specifically for the Akula second device type set up.
What is the difference?  They have several different wattage type boards of these pulse controllers, and can also custom build to specs.
   I already have over 10 years experience in the electronics assembly business, and can certainly solder. But would rather just buy something which is available, relatively cheap and very well made. Than to have to buy expensive scopes, and take the needed time to make what can already be purchased.
  I also think that if we use ready made circuits, instead of home built one, we can all benefit from using what is known to work, without spending a lot of time experimenting with what doesn't. As NONE of the control circuits built by any one here have been shown to work for a self runner device, yet.

The basic generation of the pulses and width control is not a problem, its the output stage that might not be compatible with the circuit you are trying to replicate. However if customised versions are also available, then I see no problem with this approach.

Your idea that ready made circuits will in some way reduce time experimenting is highly optimistic IMO. Granted that this approach would reduce time building but as for your comment that - "none of the control circuits built by anyone here have shown to work for a self runner, yet", that's probably because NONE of us have the genius and ability of Akula, Geo, Kapanadze and the like. 

[NickZ]

  "The basic generation of the pulses and width control is not a problem, its the output stage that might not be compatible with the circuit you are trying to replicate."
               end quote.

  But,then again,it might. As at least some these pulse controller board are made for the use of the Mazilli type induction oscillator circuits, very similar or the same as what I'm using. But, I'd hate to burn out one of these, (as happened to my meters) when also connected together with a HV pulser oscillator. Or any controller circuit, for that matter.  So, I guess that we won't know until we try it... Or I try it...
  My idea is to use one with the Mazilli crt, and one for the pulser, if possible.
   As, I'm not up to speed on these types of units. Your advice or Itsu, or anyone else is appreciated.
 
   The mentioned geniuses, may have had much outside help, to get to where they
are now. And I'm sure many components bit the dust in the process, as well.
 

[Hoppy]

  But,then again,it might. As at least some these pulse controller board are made for the use of the Mazilli type induction oscillator circuits, very similar or the same as what I'm using. But, I'd hate to burn out one of these, (as happened to my meters) when also connected together with a HV pulser oscillator. Or any controller circuit, for that matter.  So, I guess that we won't know until we try it... Or I try it...
 

Smoking components is part of the learning curve. Join the club Nick and have fun.