Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[verpies]

I think thngr is suggesting that Dally inadvertently used some operating principle of the Stepanov transformer.

[thngr]

I am so suspicious about internet Media, not only Dally's work or Kapanadze's, if there is one truth no need for bunch of them at the beginning of stone age, so it must be the one others became "free energy" charlatans.

My suggestion again: Think coax as a wire, there must be two ends right? one of them is middle wire but do not use mesh of that side use it at the other end. (coax is the serial resonance LC circuit here.)

for verpies...
"What's the benefit of stating the obvious, that the inner conductor of a coaxial cable is one side of that cable and the braid of that coaxial cable is the other side of that cable ?"
--I don't know. but we are looking for the truth right? ( I could not replicate it yet!)
"I think thngr is suggesting that Dally inadvertently used some operating principle of the Stepanov transformer."
Because This patent numbered DE 19927355 was before from kapanadze's and Dally's work; may be they have all working models inspired from that patent but not before Igor P. Kuldoshin.
http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/mosaics?CC=DE&NR=19927355A1&KC=A1&FT=D&date=20001221&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP

for Hoppy...
capacitive and inductive coils (bifilar) were also Tesla's idea, Am I wrong?
"Are you saying that Dally's circuit does not perform as claimed and that he needs a Stepanov Transformer?" May be it is not intentional ; there may be missunderstanding each other dally, westley... were there five of them speaking so many languages? is there a reason to lie? but capitalist must lie idialist not! lies are garbage of my mind. I like to think there for "I love the truth." funny ha? (I'm foreigner as you noticed.)
   

[Hoppy]

I am so suspicious about internet Media, not only Dally's work or Kapanadze's, if there is one truth no need for bunch of them at the beginning of stone age, so it must be the one others became "free energy" charlatans.

My suggestion again: Think coax as a wire, there must be two ends right? one of them is middle wire but do not use mesh of that side use it at the other end. (coax is the serial resonance LC circuit here.)

for verpies...
"What's the benefit of stating the obvious, that the inner conductor of a coaxial cable is one side of that cable and the braid of that coaxial cable is the other side of that cable ?"
--I don't know. but we are looking for the truth right? ( I could not replicate it yet!)
"I think thngr is suggesting that Dally inadvertently used some operating principle of the Stepanov transformer."
Because This patent numbered DE 19927355 was before from kapanadze's and Dally's work; may be they have all working models inspired from that patent but not before Igor P. Kuldoshin.
http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/mosaics?CC=DE&NR=19927355A1&KC=A1&FT=D&date=20001221&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP

for Hoppy...
capacitive and inductive coils (bifilar) were also Tesla's idea, Am I wrong?
"Are you saying that Dally's circuit does not perform as claimed and that he needs a Stepanov Transformer?" May be it is not intentional ; there may be missunderstanding each other dally, westley... were there five of them speaking so many languages? is there a reason to lie? but capitalist must lie idialist not! lies are garbage of my mind. I like to think there for "I love the truth." funny ha? (I'm foreigner as you noticed.)

My only objective is to try and validate Dally's claim that his device self-ran using his circuit schematic without alterations. This is a rare example of where sufficient circuit and build information has been supplied to make a replication possible. If it can be established that Dally's claim is true, then the operating principle can be studied with a view to making improvements to performance. At this point in time I'm not optimistic that validation will be forthcoming. Kapanadze's various devices cannot be validated because replication is not possible as no circuit and build detail has been provided.

Regards
Hoppy

[itsu]

@all,

i modified my nano-pulser to use the 74HCT02.
Now no more flip-over from ns to us and the pulse width range is between 15 and 765ns (10Kohm pot.).

Also i went back to using a MOSFET (IRF840) and driver (ucc27511), as with the KT926a transistor i doubt it if we will ever get it and the toroid saturated.

So i will be testing the next couple of days with this setup.

Video:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avcGWerjM0M&feature=youtu.be

MOSFET gate/drain voltage signals with this setup:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIBsE4JMkGQ&feature=youtu.be


Regards Itsu

[verpies]

My only objective is to try and validate Dally's claim that his device self-ran using his circuit schematic without alterations.

@thngr
The logic of the above is inescapeable, no matter how much we hate it.
It does represnt the pursuit of the truth, though.

This is a rare example of where sufficient circuit and build information has been supplied to make a replication possible.

Yes, very rare!
Only scopeshots are missing.

If it can be established that Dally's claim is true, then the operating principle can be studied with a view to making improvements to performance.

Yes, once it works as shown by Dally we will be free to make any ego improvements we wish.
...and if it does not then Dally won't be able to say that it is because we changed something and it's no longer a replication of his device.

At this point in time I'm not optimistic that validation will be forthcoming.

Neither am I, but this needs to be proven.
A failure of a particular scheme is an excellent discourager from experimenting with similar device that work. Psychotechics.

Kapanadze's various devices cannot be validated because replication is not possible as no circuit and build detail has been provided.

Yes, just look at all the wild theories and guesswork at this thread.