Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 228 Guests are viewing this topic.

d3x0r


@itsuSo, as I understand that bit, the pnp transistors will be open without a pulse on them; and theoretically the voltage should flow through the lowest resistance, but over a time, a positive potential should develop through the 4.7 resistor and be seen on the gate of the npn... right?  It's not like 4.7 ohms is a total block compared to the low resistance of the other side?

mihai.isteniuc

Quote from: itsu on October 07, 2012, 06:14:10 AM
for the nano-pulse part i aimed for the circuit as mentioned by "Сергей Ð'." in his post #93 (see below) as it contains the most common parts.
However, my nano-pulse has flipped over to a non-nano-pulse (meaning inverted) when feeding to the gate of the IRFU320.
So i have a constant  14V on the gate (opening the MOSFET), and then nano width pulses to ground (closing the MOSFET).
This looks reversed from what it should be, right?
Is this a design flaw, am i not thinking right, or did i make a mistake somewhere?    Any thoughts, suggestions?

Regards Itsu

Hi Itsu,

The way I see it: If you take into considertaion the other circuit with KT926, the pulse coming from the DD1 it's the one going into the base of KT 926 transistor. Basically this should happend here too. So you have to see where the things got drastically change in your design. On the base of the first KT 972 things should be ok. what,s happning in the collector of the first kt972? also in the emiter of the second kt972?

I will go with the simplest design (from my point of view) with kt926. But for the moment i don't have the time to finish this part. Still waiting for kd203a to arrive. Also i have to determine the permeability for the ferrite rings i have to see if one it's suitable, make the transformer with cooling oil and so on ...

fantom

Hi !
Would like to show my vision of Dally systems blocks.
I think this way its little easy to guess about how does it works..


Thanks

fantom


d3x0r

Quote from: fantom on October 07, 2012, 07:33:53 AM
Hi !
Would like to show my vision of Dally systems blocks.
I think this way its little easy to guess about how does it works..


Thanks


Your diagram is all messed up :) 
L4 is the output/load/input to dc-dc converter...
the dc/dc converter is 110/220->12v not the other way... so the 12V takes the place of the battery, this comes from L4 (what you have marked L3)
on t1 there's really 4 windings, the 4th goes to the top GEN2  (you have 2 gen2's)