Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 483 Guests are viewing this topic.

itsu


Thanks verpies / Vasiliy for confirmation on the permeability measurements.

Also verpies thanks for the next step    the saturation point.

(It makes me feel like going forward half the step of the previous one; going forward, but never reaching the goal).

I understand we must work in saturation mode (post #228), so we should be able to see that in the created nano-pulse,
Quote(sloping line indicates on the transformer in saturation mode.)
right?

Anyway,  concerning the design error of the IRFU320 MOSFET nano-pulser, for those who are intrested, i made some additional scope shots showing the problem:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNxkLCMlpS0&feature=youtu.be

I am sure the problem is in the design of the diagram.

I will remove the both transistors and use a max4420 MOSFET driver to drive the MOSFET.
If that's not going to work i will have to look for KT629A transistors

Regards Itsu

verpies

Quote from: itsu on October 08, 2012, 09:24:43 AM
It makes me feel like going forward half the step of the previous one; going forward, but never reaching the goal
Wait till you get to the DSDR effect ;)

Quote from: itsu on October 08, 2012, 09:24:43 AM
I understand we must work in saturation mode (post #228), so we should be able to see that in the created nano-pulse, right?
In general - no.
The DSD Diode can be driven even more efficiently without a transformer in saturation mode.
However, if your goal is not to do 1:1 replication without "ego improvements" then you must follow Dally's design with the saturable transformer :(

Quote from: itsu on October 08, 2012, 09:24:43 AM
Anyway,  concerning the design error of the IRFU320 MOSFET nano-pulser, for those who are intrested, i made some additional scope shots showing the problem:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNxkLCMlpS0&feature=youtu.be
I did not watch the video yet.  Stuck in traffic again ;(

Vasiliy Buslaev

Quote from: itsu on October 08, 2012, 09:24:43 AM

Quotesloping line indicates on the  transformer in  saturation mode

Regards Itsu

Well, at least in our system of notation so accepted

Regards

verpies

I thought that those symbols circled in red are the symbols for radiators (ribs and all ;) )


verpies

Quote from: itsu on October 08, 2012, 09:24:43 AM
I am sure the problem is in the design of the diagram.
What happens to the polarity of the pulses if you flip the switch S2 ?