Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[verpies]

In Dally's device, the only place where this can happen is in the inverter transformer, with a ferrite/iron core. Contrary to what I thought at first, the important interaction is not between the nanopulser output and L2/L4, but with L1, which will convey the nano pulse to the inverter winding that feeds L1. The nano pulse provides a trigger to the event.
The question is: how does this happen inside the transformer core, what does the nanopulser exactly trigger?

I like it much better than energy "from ambient", "from the Dirac sea", "from air", "from the wires", "from the PVC tube", etc...

Indeed, the ferrite core of T2 is a non-linear material capable of many exotic phenomena.
For example the Zinc atoms in some of the old Russian black ferrites are capable of beta decay and forming a circular current of very energetic charged particles. 
The generation of these particles, allegedly can be stimulated by the dense comb of frequencies that the nanopulses are composed of, in concert with a DC or LF perpendicular magnetic field.

The core of T2 could be the missing "gain medium" that I objected to earlier. 
If true, then its shape and chemical composition would be of paramount importance. (winding orientation, too)

[Hoppy]

@itsu, @ verpies
My thoughts on Dally's working principle:
First, I want to make clear that this is still a conjecture.
I think the process has to be a non-linear one - if it were not so, you would have energy pouring out of any circuit with a tuned circuit. So, circuits with linear inductors, capacitors, resistors, voltage and current supplies, by themselves, cannot present an OU behavior. There has to be, at least, one non-linear element where the energy exchange takes place.
in Dally's device, the only place where this can happen is in the inverter transformer, with a ferrite/iron core. Contrary to what I thought at first, the important interaction is not between the nanopulser output and L2/L4, but with L1, which will convey the nano pulse to the inverter winding that feeds L1. The nano pulse provides a trigger to the event.
The question is: how does this happen inside the transformer core, what does the nanopulser exactly trigger?
In the operation of the inverter, the B field "walks" over the histeresis curve of the core, normally away from the saturation extremes. When the nano pulse is applied, it shoots the core deeply in saturation, creating a kind of modulation of the core permeability. This core permeability change implies in a change in the secondary and primary inductance values. With the correct relationship between the inverter frequency and nanopulser frequency, and correct phase alignment, this could lead to parametric amplification, that would explain the increased energy at the output.
The roles of L2 and L4 would only be wave shaping (sine wave at L2) and impedance matching to the load (L4).

Comments?

I've just been looking in from time to time as I have nothing new to contribute. However, your post has prompted me to post as I think that you may well be closer to the secret with your suggestion about a non-linear component being the catalyst for the increased energy output. The logic here is that Dally's nano-pulse was unlikely to have been any better and probably worse than Itsu's in terms of nano pulse width and amplitude and as yet Itsu is not seeing any increased output despite tuning. Also, the fracturing of Itsu's toroid strongly suggests that the nano-pulse may have a 'special' magnetostriction effect on the ferrite core. the same effect may also happen to Dally's inverter transformer assuming it did have a ferrite core. I have never believed that induction alone would create the 'effect', so the physical construction and core material of the inverter transformer could be critical, as could the phasing of the transformer windings.

Edit: With regards to the ferrite composition, I have read that ferrite with Barium composition are known to have 'special' qualities. Apparently Barium is not used commonly in ferrite nowadays but was used widely back in the past. If Dally's transformer was manufactured back in the 70's and has a ferrite core, it may well have a Barium content.

Regards
Hoppy

[itsu]

I too like this idea Black_Bird, however, the last post from Dally on his blog starts with:
"Green transformer was not the most important"
But who knows why he said that.

Anyway, should we then not better nano-pulse this T2 toroid instead of the L1/L2/L4 combo?

By the way verpies, both L1, L2 and L4 are in phase

Regards Itsu

[Black_Bird]

@verpies,@hoppy,@itsu
In my tests, I can hear some magnetostriction on the inverter core, for some position of L1 relative to L2/L3/L4, but no real gain. The fact  is, if my ideas make sense, then, the nanopulser should operate at aproximately twice the frequency of the inverter ( not necessarily equal, but close to) to observe some gain. In my implementation, my inverter is operating at 58.2 KHz and it will be difficult for me to make the nanopulser work close to 116 KHz. Itsu, can you do this test with your setup? I know you operate your inverter at about 4.6Khz, can you make your nanopulser work at about 9 or 9.2 KHz?

[verpies]

Guys,

I remind you that Graham Gunderson has a Patent US8093869 that hinges on magnetoelasticity and magnetostrictively induced acoustic standing waves in ferrite cored inductors.