Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[verpies]

... the energy that is produced is ALL coming from the surrounding ambient, not from the input source.  But, many like Verpies will not accept that. They will have many reasons as to why that is not so. But, no proof,  ever.

Neither you have a proof of conversion of ambient vacuum to energy.

They know it all.  All the proof in the world will not change their mind.  His true and unchanging belief is  "TESLA is very wrong".    There you have it...

It's wrong for you to predict my ignorance of experimental evidence and imply my self-perceived omniscience.  So far I have not seen any proof of converting vacuum to energy.

His true and unchanging belief is  "TESLA is very wrong".    There you have it...

Yes, he is wrong about the pre-atomic structure of matter (see a rebuttal of similar views here), but I did not write that he is wrong about everything.  e.g. his AC engineering principles are correct.

I can prove that something is wrong (do you want me to?) but I cannot prove that something does not exist - that feat cannot be done by anyone.

even the new Magnacoaster device will not change his mind, either, or others like him. 

It is wrong to conclude, that the Magnacoaster device converts vacuum to energy even if it functions as advertised.
In his patent, Richard Willis specifically mentions material core (#34) inside his induction coil, not a vacuum (or air).
Anyway, the operating principle of Magnacoaster's devices has not been independently analyzed and can be anything.

BTW:  Has anybody actually received a Magnacoaster device?  Isn't there a several months shipping delay?

As they don't even think that it's possible, even if they were holding it in their hands, and watching it work.  Each to his own...

What is "it" ?
If "it" means converting vacuum to energy, then yes, I don't think that's possible.
However it is wrong for you to predict my close mindedness in the face of an experimental evidence to the contrary.  I have not seen such evidence so far.

For the record: I don't think it is impossible to convert one form of energy to another, or to convert matter(mass) to energy.
IMO, devices generating plentiful energy are possible - just not from ambient vacuum.

Short & sharp EM spikes applied to a material Gain Medium (e.g. a thinly slotted thick brass pipe) are likely components of such devices. 
Remember that this discussion started when MenofFather noticed that all these devices have a material Gain Medium, see here.

[Qwert]

Tesla was an ingenuous man, for sure. But Tesla couldn't know everything. Otherwise, we wouldn't need this forum since all those problems touched here would be already solved... by Tesla.

[NickZ]

  Verpies:
  NO need to explain. I as well as others know just how you feel about the harvesting of ambient energy.
I however don't share your opinion, nor will waist more time discussing it or trying to prove it to someone that does not think that it even exists. You are free to think what you like. However your arrogance does come through for all to see.

[Qwert]

In my opinion, if these devices actually work, then the sheet/pipe is the "gain medium" where the energy originates.
It is a physical process aided by electronics. 
The process is not based on electronics alone, thus electronic schematic diagrams cannot illustrate it fully.

Here is probably most recent work of Otto; last several years of his life he devoted to experiment to resolve TPU. In this, probably very last of his documents - he went to similar conclusions. His wasn't aluminum, however: his suggestion is German silver (other names: nickel silver, alpacca and several others).
http://purco.qc.ca/ftp/Overunity.com%20-%20Forum%20members/otto/ottos-open-tpu/
http://www.overunity.com/profile/otto.2747/#.UbH5JJywUTU

[verpies]

I as well as others know just how you feel about the harvesting of ambient energy...
...However your arrogance does come through for all to see.

My opinion about energy from nothing or ambient vacuum is less arrogant than your prediction of my reaction to empirical evidence and your implication of my closed mindedness - both are Ad Hominem statements, with which you have crossed the line. First.