Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 156 Guests are viewing this topic.

NickZ

  Bat1:
  You are getting 44v at the bulbs?  They do look pretty dim, but the output voltage will depend on the amount of bulbs that you are using, and the wattage of those bulbs, as they are part of the circuit, as well.  Using only One bulb, the output should be around 1000 volts, as Ruslan is showing on his last video.
  What is your input reading, compared to the 1.2 amp output?
  An analog meter works better than a digital one, for these voltages of varying frequencies. 
  I don't think the 44v, 1.2amps is correct as your output.  The 5 bulbs would probably not be lit, on 44v, 1.2 amps.  53 watts, output?  Or barely lit, or glowing, if that.

   Bat, you mentioned that everything on your device is the same as on Akula/Ruslan devices.  But, I don't really see anything that's the same.  The small fets will not give you the same output as the IRFP260N, nor will that smaller yoke, nor all those long wires spread out all over the place, or the different tuning caps, small wattage bulbs, etz...   I'm not trying to be critical, just tossing some thoughts, as I've been there.  But, If you're satisfied with the results, then don't change anything, and just keep thinking, that it's all a fake, and that you've prove it to yourself.

Collapsingfield

Ruslan again:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBAB5uYAeA8

Hoppy

Quote from: Bat1Robin2 on April 27, 2015, 10:27:03 AM
Hoppy,
I measure output power with 2 high quality meters (fluke). 1 measures dc amps to the bulbs the other measures dc volts at the bulbs. (keep meters far away from tesla field.) Do not trust cheap meters they will begin to swing all around even go negative and such.  In this particular picture i think it reads 1.2 amp and 44 volt. i am running only the small fets i did not see a reason to scale up at this time. 72% is the best setting found i sweep from 14khz  to 60khz searching for sweet spots. with different caps constantly monitor efficiency.

Thanks Batman.

Does the Fluke reading correspond to a scope reading across say a 1R or 0.5R series shunt resistor?

magpwr

Quote from: starcruiser on April 26, 2015, 02:16:28 PM
@Magpwr,

Please note the multilayer Coil will be resonant at around 7.8xx Mhz since the wire length is shorter than the Tesla/Kacher secondary, thus the wavelength/frequency diff. You are looking at a resonant peak that is 1/4 down from the primary resonant peak if you are seeing a signal around the 1.8Mhz area. I have seen this on my testing with the sweep generator and scope when testing the secondary and grenade coil. We need to include the "top Load" (antenna) in the equation since this will impact the resonance of both due to capacitive effects. Just something to keep in mind.


An Update on my test rig:

I have made my Primary coils this weekend as well as the antenna coil, now I need to mount the assembly and coils to re-test them for resonance, then adjust the tesla/kacher secondary to tune. Once this looks right I will then start building the inverter circuit. I will post updates and pictures of the results when the resonant testing step is completed.



We need to be accurate in the tuning otherwise we will not see the expected results, good luck

hi starcruiser and everyone,

There is something which i have not strongly emphasized in my last comment maybe i have left out the key point by accident it was a exhausting weekend all the way due to experimenting.

For a start the bulb should not be lit at all once power to kacher or high voltage supply 300volts to primary coil is disconnected related to nanosecond generator version which i am using.
This means there is no resonance to begin with before activating kacher or my high kv nanosecond pulse generator.

I only obtain this effect similar to URFA but i am using nanosecond pulse which should appear at positive peak of sine wave which i have attached few days ago.
Since it was my first experiment with high kv nanosecond pulse i have not tried with pulse to appear both at positive and negative peak.
But no effect noted at nanosecond appearing at negative half.

Tuning is easy tune to make bulb appear brightest then disconnect the power in my case to hv supply then observe the light just fade away slowly in within 4 seconds,once hv capacitor is discharged fully.

But my comment is only valid for those whom are using nanosecond pulse approach.I can't advise anything if anyone is sticking with Kacher version including URFA.

The obvious advantage using nanosecond pulse to obtain high kv is low current consumption at 12volts to obtain 5.xxkv at the Antenna as compared to using 12volts or more with kacher.
For kacher high voltage means high current.But no current to single wire to Earth wire detected with kacher.

------------------------------
I have attached a simple nanosecond generator circuit which is connected to one of the 2 output of PWM generator at the mosfet driver input.
But i am using 10nf for C1 and pin 1 is connected via 1k to one of the 2 output of PWM generator and optional 10k from pin 1 to GND.
Set at 68ns...70ns to be produce from output of mosfet driver.

I am using high end mosfet driver IXDI614 or alternative IXDI414 which can handle up to 35volts but i stick at 24volts(boosted supply from 12volts) to properly drive CREE SIC 1.2KV MOSFET gate capacitance mere 950pf.Mosfet Model provided previously so no repeating once more."Expensive Mosfet $16USD ea,not a toy for testing"

Bat1Robin2

nick,   With meters measuring DC on both input and output its really hard to dispute that accuracy.

uploading video now. I am fine with your comments and appreciate your point of view. i realize my project is not real neat and such but you have to admit i keep the lid off my boxes when running as Ruslan does not.  Why why why put this in a box and cover it. (in my opinion only one reason to hide)  And maybe there is a larger fet and yoke version that will work but i don't think my yoke is any smaller than than the one in the videos.  Like i said before i have a larger yoke i will get wound and try it as well. I just wanted to completely explore the "effect" that i see as the tesla is powered up.
with all frequencies of input and loads examined and charted as data.  I show full open boxes with scope shots. All along i wondered why he puts that yoke on top of a closed box. Can you at least admit  this is not running and open at the same time in any of his videos? I am searching for truth,  fluke meter measuring DC shows me truth closed boxes do not. Use the same power supply  for all fet and you will see "the effect". As when the tesla comes into play the efficiency increases dramatically up to 70% at some peaks depending on load.

hoppy & nick, i will try the low ohm resistor in series with bulb to verify amps on scope for you. (It is dc but i will see how clean with scope for sure)