Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[Dog-One]

Hi Dog,  not shure what you mean by "the Dally coil", but i know a series or parallel resonance circuit can have much amperage flowing between the L and C.

Basically I went back to one of the first posts in this thread and wound a very simple coil.  Right now it only has two layers--one for the input and the second layer is the resonant coil.  I haven't wound the coax or the output layer as yet.  Trying to keep it simple and understand all the steps as I go.

What you see in the image below is the blue taped Dally coil with only the two layers applied.  On the bottom of the picture is the connections for the outer (2nd layer).  This hooks to four 0.47uF pulse capacitors connected in parallel.  At the top of the picture is my Ruslan-style push-pull driver.  What you should notice is that I'm not doing push-pull.  I'm only using one side of this board, giving me pulses with controlled frequency and pulse width.  The thing you may find interesting (I did for sure) is the toroid core.  This is a nanocrystaline core of very high A_L value which is connected in series with the inner winding (1st layer) of the Dally coil.  This toroid allows me to easily control the inductance the driver board sees.  Just adding/subtracting a turn or two and I can completely change the dynamics of this system.  I can make the Dally air-core coil look just like a ferrite inductor to the driver.  I'm guessing most of you guys thought, duh, that's obvious, but it wasn't to me.

Anyway, with this setup, I needn't worry about any silly yoke transformer.  I can find the resonant frequency of the tank circuit and dial it in using three adjustments:  Frequency (obviously), pulse width and turns on the nanocrystaline core.  Right now I'm on the fundamental frequency of 17.8kHz and as I said previously, the Dally coil heats up.  Makes sense since with a proper impedance match, the energy has nowhere else to go.  I'm hoping once I wind the coax (3rd layer) and the output winding (4th layer), then connect to output to a load, I should see the coil run much cooler as the energy stored in the tank circuit will now have a way out.

Some discovery notes I have so far are:

1.  You don't need a yoke core or any type of transformer.
2.  Using a high A_L value choke in series with the air-core coil allows you to tune in a way I didn't think was possible.
3.  The two layer air-core coil can easily work as a audio frequency transformer provided you have the proper capacitance added to it.
4.  The IRF3077 MOSFET which is extremely high current, low internal resistance, can be used if you match the impedance properly.  This was a major stumbling point for me trying to drive the yoke core.
5.  This setup unlike the Mazilli driver has full frequency control.
6.  When tuning, you will discover the pulse width (i.e. duty cycle control) works directly with the inductance of the nanocrystaline choke.  You will see no resonance at all until the pulse width size crosses a particular threshold, at which point full power is transferred.  Basically the entire energy pulse gets absorbed by the choke when the pulse width is too small.  Once you cross that boundary, boom, the air-core coil begins to resonate.  And with only a small number of turns, it is really easy to tune this way.

[Dog-One]

First get one working than I will show you how dangerous it is !!!

Michael,

Where I am living right now, the radiation levels are 350 times normal.  Danger is not something I can avoid any longer.  I can't go outside for more than an hour without getting fried, so lighting up an experiment on my workbench is the least of my worries.  My only goal now is to know it can be done.  It would be real nice for you to help in this quest, but it appears this is something that will need to be accomplished by me, for me.  You still haven't convinced me you even know how the Dally device works or that you could build one.  Why the resistance?  What is your real motivation?


"We all have it coming kid."
   -- Will Munny, The Unforgiven

[d3x0r]

Dog-One You really need to move !

The danger with all these coils generators is quite serious if you keep running from the same coil and than one day your going to get a very big bang out of it .......

The one your trying top build is no different than any other its all the same principle but you need more than just a bit of circuitry ! I often wonder why so many people replicate and the device never responds as to the same at the inventors one I want you to consider additional components ! But if your happy with what the inventor is telling you stick with that !

So; do you have a name of the phenomenon or some way to research what the MO (method of operation) is?  What is the effect?  What does it affect?  Scare tactics won't work with anyone here, you'll just be glossed over.  Same principle in bucking-coils?  what's the big deal with partially inverted coils?  Other than taking your word for any of this do you have any real information to share?

[Tomtech29]

Basically I went back to one of the first posts in this thread and wound a very simple coil.  Right now it only has two layers--one for the input and the second layer is the resonant coil.  I haven't wound the coax or the output layer as yet.  Trying to keep it simple and understand all the steps as I go.

What you see in the image below is the blue taped Dally coil with only the two layers applied.  On the bottom of the picture is the connections for the outer (2nd layer).  This hooks to four 0.47uF pulse capacitors connected in parallel.  At the top of the picture is my Ruslan-style push-pull driver.  What you should notice is that I'm not doing push-pull.  I'm only using one side of this board, giving me pulses with controlled frequency and pulse width.  The thing you may find interesting (I did for sure) is the toroid core.  This is a nanocrystaline core of very high A_L value which is connected in series with the inner winding (1st layer) of the Dally coil.  This toroid allows me to easily control the inductance the driver board sees.  Just adding/subtracting a turn or two and I can completely change the dynamics of this system.  I can make the Dally air-core coil look just like a ferrite inductor to the driver.  I'm guessing most of you guys thought, duh, that's obvious, but it wasn't to me.

Anyway, with this setup, I needn't worry about any silly yoke transformer.  I can find the resonant frequency of the tank circuit and dial it in using three adjustments:  Frequency (obviously), pulse width and turns on the nanocrystaline core.  Right now I'm on the fundamental frequency of 17.8kHz and as I said previously, the Dally coil heats up.  Makes sense since with a proper impedance match, the energy has nowhere else to go.  I'm hoping once I wind the coax (3rd layer) and the output winding (4th layer), then connect to output to a load, I should see the coil run much cooler as the energy stored in the tank circuit will now have a way out.

Some discovery notes I have so far are:

1.  You don't need a yoke core or any type of transformer.
2.  Using a high A_L value choke in series with the air-core coil allows you to tune in a way I didn't think was possible.
3.  The two layer air-core coil can easily work as a audio frequency transformer provided you have the proper capacitance added to it.
4.  The IRF3077 MOSFET which is extremely high current, low internal resistance, can be used if you match the impedance properly.  This was a major stumbling point for me trying to drive the yoke core.
5.  This setup unlike the Mazilli driver has full frequency control.
6.  When tuning, you will discover the pulse width (i.e. duty cycle control) works directly with the inductance of the nanocrystaline choke.  You will see no resonance at all until the pulse width size crosses a particular threshold, at which point full power is transferred.  Basically the entire energy pulse gets absorbed by the choke when the pulse width is too small.  Once you cross that boundary, boom, the air-core coil begins to resonate.  And with only a small number of turns, it is really easy to tune this way.

Dog-One great edition.
high class envy you though we managed to find a solution...I would order the PCB $$$?
I do not alone and give up, on these basic knitting amateur trying -I encounter difficulties in such simple systems ""
I would like to get more power output of the nano-pulse currently have only 82 volts This is definitely not enough I will need from you guys some good tips system's view of Itsu 1kV is a good result!
But he also worries me as in my terms without such high voltage probe successfully I burn cheap equipment, is there any way? Use of the type limiter which the probe is:what there is inside resistors and capacitors?
-so at the beginning of the experiment carried out on a regulated power supply and gradually strengthen tension.
P.s
I do not know where the problem lies also noticed that the signal appears on the 75 ohm resistor only in the vicinity of 260nS. (when I go to a shorter interval or larger disappears and the ampere consumption rises dramatically)
connected in series to the input light bulb ady watch what happens in the 130 volt control power.

[Dog-One]

Dog-One great edition.

Thank you.  Just logging and sharing what I discover as I go along.  Glad you find it helpful.

high class envy you though we managed to find a solution...I would order the PCB $$$?

I have four more of those Ruslan push-pull boards if you want one, send me a PM.

I do not alone and give up, on these basic knitting amateur trying -I encounter difficulties in such simple systems ""
I would like to get more power output of the nano-pulse currently have only 82 volts This is definitely not enough I will need from you guys some good tips system's view of Itsu 1kV is a good result!
But he also worries me as in my terms without such high voltage probe successfully I burn cheap equipment, is there any way? Use of the type limiter which the probe is:what there is inside resistors and capacitors?

It may not be the best method, but if you use isolated current sensors as I am doing, high voltage will not have a path to your instrumentation.  You just will not be able to see the actual tension in the wire, but you will be able to see current flow.  Typically I use neon or fluorescent bulb to indicate voltage.

-so at the beginning of the experiment carried out on a regulated power supply and gradually strengthen tension.
P.s
I do not know where the problem lies also noticed that the signal appears on the 75 ohm resistor only in the vicinity of 260nS. (when I go to a shorter interval or larger disappears and the ampere consumption rises dramatically)

Ah hah!  You have an inductor in the output drive and guess what that will do?

It will only respond to a very particular pulse width.  Too narrow or too wide and you get nothing.  This is fine once you know the exact pulse width you need, but is very limiting while you are searching for the correct width your device needs.

When I get to the point you are at in my development, I'm going to use a direct drive into the coax.  That way I can pick any pulse width I want.  I just have to make sure the pulse width is narrow enough the return reflection doesn't walk all over it.  I can probably just charge a high voltage cap and dump a portion of it through one of those Cree MOSFETs.  I'm planning on using RG-174 coax and because this is fairly small diameter, I will have plenty of length spooled on the coil to give me the chance to get fairly wide pulses if needed.  At about 8 inches per nanosecond--100 feet equates to 300 nanoseconds round trip.  Surely the sweet spot will be less than that.