Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[verpies]

Ok, so the clamp windings cuts out the HV spikes.  "That's all it does" ?

That is its purpose and main function. Getting rid of the HV spikes has also positive side effects.

... returning some power to the PS. And also, to eliminate over heating of components, as you previously mentioned. That was also supposed to be it's purpose.  Or not? Maybe I misunderstood?

Recycling the energy contained in these spikes back into the power supply circuit (the filter capacitors) and the others advantages are the positive side effects.
Taking up winding space is the negative side effect.

All the while running a full load, to at least what PS wattage (240w-360w)can provide

It will decrease the input power, by the amount of "spike energy" recycled.

, and also coordinating the HV circuit to be in sync with the induction circuit, 

The non-dissipative clamps will not influence the LC resonance synchronization. For that a PLL is best.

[verpies]

About additional winding on yoke in parallel to primary - connecting just capacitor to it also will dampen BEMF. And if in resonance it will help push-pull to drive Yoke.

In such push-pull winding configuration you'd need two capacitors (one for each primary winding half).  Did you consider what the 2nd capacitor would do when the 1st winding (and cap) is driven?

You could have only one cap with a full-H bridge drive and one primary winding in parallel with this cap, but then the circuit stops being a power amplifier and becomes an oscillator with a fixed resonance frequency...similarly to the Mazilli circuit.

[T-1000]

In such push-pull winding configuration you'd need two capacitors (one for each primary winding half).  Did you consider what the 2nd capacitor would do when the 1st winding (and cap) is driven?

What I mean is that:

[Void]

I'll take it as a no then, that no one here knows of a good reliable way to check on the
most current status of a patent application.

There are several people here who are referring to the high voltage pulse that occurs
after the driving pulse to a coil is switched off, as 'BEMF'.  BEMF, AKA back EMF or counter
EMF only occurs while a driving EMF is applied to a coil. Back EMF is oriented polarity wise in
such a way that it acts counter to the driving EMF. This is why it is also referred to as counter EMF.
When the driving voltage pulse is switched off, the magnetic field around the coil collapses and creates
the high voltage pulse. This is not back EMF or counter EMF, since the driving EMF is already switched off at this point,
so there is no driving EMF to counter. BEMF and the switching pulse that occurs on a coil when driving
pulses are switched off, are two different things.

[verpies]

What I mean is that:

Oh, that will suppress all HV spikes but will limit the bandwidth of this circuit and increase the reactive input power.
It's like putting a capacitor across an alternating voltage source.  No real power, but all reactive power.

P.S.
In ideal transformers, windings are not inductors but alternating voltage sources. A capacitor across such winding does not form an LC circuit, despite that it looks that way on a schematic.
It is as if the transformer's mutual inductance consumes the inductance of a lone winding.