Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[x_name41]

Hello, I would like to say that this device of Roma Gritz (Andrey Bruhovetskii) is very similar to the device in the last video of Tariel Kapanadze from may 2015 y., and that component marked as "cap" that's not really the capacitor, this is actually a 50 hertz a shaper (pulse former like 50Hz Triac AC Power regulator). Grab and compared the two devices in one image 

and this of the image is the son of Tariel, Temo (Timur) who makes the devices )

[AlienGrey]

Hello, I would like to say that this device of Roma Gritz (Andrey Bruhovetskii) is very similar to the device in the last video of Tariel Kapanadze from may 2015 y., and that component marked as "cap" that's not really the capacitor, this is actually a 50 hertz a shaper (pulse former like 50Hz Triac AC Power regulator). Grab and compared the two devices in one image 

and this of the image is the son of Tariel, Temo (Timur) who makes the devices )

yes that would do the job ok, he is a clever man ! thanks for sharing that info.
AG

[verpies]

Here's one I have yet to see a satisfactory answer to...
Some physicists contend an electron has to rotate 720 degrees to make one complete revolution in real space.  I would like to know how they apply a marker to some point on the surface of the electron in order to track the exact angular displacement. 

This observation applies only to particles with ½ fractional spin.  Particles with integer spin do not exhibit it.
The reason for the 720º cyclicity is two-dimensional rotation.

The cyclicity of one-dimensional rotation is 360º/cycle or 2π radians / 1D-rotation.
The cyclicity of two-dimensional rotation is 720º/cycle or 4π steradians / 2D-rotation.

Notice the difference between the radian and steradian.

This issue is further discussed here and here.

I don't particularly disagree with their claim, because it would make sense based on the Dirac equations that an electron does indeed oscillate in a figure-8 pattern into imaginary space then back out into real space. 

There is no need to invoke imaginary space or virtual space, which are both unreal.  The two documents above should make that obvious.
My objection does not include counterspace, which is a real geometric feature illustrated here.

I'd just like to know how they physically confirm this to be true. 

Frequency halving

My answer is spin or rotation about an origin.  I see no reason spin would need to be confined to a particle of matter, though it does make a good candidate.  Spin could just as easily be attributed to a force or to a field which may create a force.

You propose matter or force or a field ...as the reference for motion.
...why not time?

As far as matter is concerned, I would highly suspect this to be some sort of condensate of energy, wrapped upon itself, giving the form we know as matter.  Typically when I think of energy, I envision something on the move, displacing with time.  If energy is able to wrap itself up, it may still be moving (spin), but is no longer moving as a vector, revealing itself to us as something else, that something we define to be matter.

That is an astute analysis, especially the part I highlighted in bold.

Notice that you choose the energy as the reference point for spin and other motions.
Many people choose that, the other choices for primary entities are:
- Matter,
- Aether,
- Charge field (as in the capacitor's displacement field), see here.
- Time.

I think that the last option forms the most elegant solution, because it is real, quantifiable, all-pervasive and yielding itself to rigorous analysis.
The ratio of space to time constitutes motion anyway you look at it - an observation which is lost on many despite the ubiquitous units which we commonly use to measure the magnitude of motion (speed) such as: km/h or mph.

In this way of thinking, matter, energy and antimatter are all derived from the concept of motion, which is nothing more than a ratio of space to time that we commonly understand as speed.  Through geometrical considerations the spatial aspect of motion can become wraped-up and solidified as matter, just like you guessed above (the links below describe exactly how). It all works the same regardless of size - from the subatomic to the astronomical scales.

Motion, in this context, is not about "something moving," but about a ratio of space to time that can be expressed as speed or energy—both of which cause change. Space and time are not separate concepts , they are always linked together as aspects of motion. You cannot have one without the other.  That's why, I call them reciprocal aspects of the same motion.

Further development of this analysis is here and here.

[x_name41]

but actually if kacher is modulated with 50 hertz at the input, then the output should LC filter 
incidentally one component there wrapped with tape (looks like small toroid inductor),it is located at the entrance of kacher, it is possible that with him be executed blocking generator (like Joule Thief circuit for 50Hz who modulate  the kacher)

[verpies]

Well, at least you're trying to understand. However, it's not so difficult. But, it's not something that can be explained in a few words. Even our scientists mention that the the cosmos it expanding. So, what is it that is expanding, other than the visible worlds? Empty space? 

Now you are getting to the essence of things.
Yes, in a way the expansion of space is the primary phenomenon.  IMO it is what you unknowingly call Aether.

More precisely, the primary entity is motion, which has two reciprocal aspects: space and time.
On small scales this ratio is fixed at the speed of light.  On larger scales (above one unit of space or time) it is the average speed summed over many units and can be different than c due to geometrical reversals and looping (wrapping up).

When the space becomes wraped-up, it forms matter, just like Dog-One has guessed. When this happens in three dimensions, the eternal progression @ c (1 unit of space per 1 unit of time) is halted in space and the material particles form the familiar reference system in which space is frozen (as 3D Euclidean) and time continues progressing just like "before".