Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[lost_bro]

   Possibly the only co-insidental part of it is, that you just happen to find the connection at this time. Between how Tesla explains it, and how Akula displays it. Concerning the cancellation of induction such as on the Akula/Ruslan Kacher circuits, as well as on the grenade coil. Good find,  you know how Void like to hear direct quotes and all...
   All those coil direction reversals...  are there for a purpose.  But, that's obviously not all that's needed for the amplification effect.

   However what happens between two Tesla coils, a transmitter and a receiver, may not be the same exact thing.
   
  I've heard of a galvanic reaction, such as in galvanic cells. But, not as in a "galvanic connection".
   Perhaps, you mean a wired connection? As different from of a wireless connection? Or, even a wireless capacitive link, instead.

Good day NickZ

Actually I have been aware of this for a number of years now: this post  was from Dec. 2015.........

Good day All:

Pertaining to the 'Extra Coil' , aka *antenna* in Ruslan's system.... it is recommended by Tesla to use a small inductor to 'loosen' the coupling between the secondary and 'Extra Coil' to allow free movement/vibration of the Extra coil.  I believe that this small coil is analogous to the the CC/CW wound small inductor as used by Ruslan and placed between Secondary and Antenna.

Also note the recommendation regarding the tuning of the secondary with relation to the 'Extra Coil' aka *antenna*.

take care, peace
lost_bro

" I've heard of a galvanic reaction, such as in galvanic cells. But, not as in a "galvanic connection". Perhaps, you mean a wired connection?"

Actually the term galvanic connection/galvanic isolation is correct, I do NOT mean 'wired' connection as that term is ambiguous.  I specifically mean galvanically connected as in a non-galvanically isolated power supply, SMPS etc.  This (galvanic isolation) is opposed to a non-galvanically isolated power supply which happens to have a common *connection* between input and output (usually the ground). This non-isolated power supply is said to  be non-galvanically isolated (or galvanically connected, ie matter of semantics) as it shares a common connection between input and output.

"Or, even a wireless capacitive link, instead."

If it was capacitively coupled/linked, then the *connection* would be a Galvanically Isolated connection.............which is the opposit of a *Galvanic connection*

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galvanic_isolation

Hope this sheds some light upon the topic.

take care, peace
lost_bro

[NickZ]

  Lost-Bro:
  You mentioned: "The reduction of inductive coupling allow both coils (secondary & *extra coil*) to individually vibrate at their respective frequencies, even though they are *galvanically* connected."
                                                                                                          end quote.

   If I place my scope probe near the antenna coil, or near the Kacher's secondary coil, I detect no difference in the running frequency between them. This is with the ferrite rod,  the 4 reversed turns coils, and the antenna coil all acting as one thing.
Not vibrating separately, as you mentioned above. I just tried it, and find that they are all vibrating at the same frequency, not at their individual frequencies. When they are connected up in the normal Akula/Ruslan fashion.
 
   So, how can we determine if the "induction cancelling" mode of wiring,  is actually working as such. Or not? 
 
   Since Itsu did some tests concerning the induction cancelling effects in the reversal of his grenade coils winding directions.
Perhaps he can further shed some light concerning his results, and the difference that this induction cancelling effect can have..
Yet, the main thing is what effect it may have in the entire sync process. Or why there is still no extra energy out, than in, to be noticed.
  What are we still be doing wrong??? Which results in no additional increase at the output???

 

[verpies]

Actually the term galvanic connection/galvanic isolation is correct...

Yes it is correct and widely used in electronic engineering.

@Jeg
I agree with Void's comments about coupling two Tesla coils.

Regardless whether they are coupled electrically or magnetically, their frequency response will depend on the amount of coupling.  Read this for more on this subject.

[lost_bro]

  Lost-Bro:
  You mentioned: "The reduction of inductive coupling allow both coils (secondary & *extra coil*) to individually vibrate at their respective frequencies, even though they are *galvanically* connected."
                                                                                                          end quote.

  If I place my scope probe near the antenna coil, or near the Kacher's secondary coil, I detect no difference in the running frequency between them. This is with the ferrite rod,  the 4 reversed turns coils, and the antenna coil all acting as one thing.
Not vibrating separately, as you mentioned above. I just tried it, and find that they are all vibrating at the same frequency, not at their individual frequencies. When they are connected up in the normal Akula/Ruslan fashion.
 
   So, how can we determine if the "induction cancelling" mode of wiring,  is actually working as such. Or not? 
 
   Since Itsu did some tests concerning the induction cancelling effects in the reversal of his grenade coils winding directions.
Perhaps he can further shed some light concerning his results, and the difference that this induction cancelling effect can have..
Yet, the main thing is what effect it may have in the entire sync process. Or why there is still no extra energy out, than in, to be noticed.
  What are we still be doing wrong??? Which results in no additional increase at the output???

Good day NickZ

  If I place my scope probe near the antenna coil, or near the Kacher's secondary coil, I detect no difference in the running frequency between them. This is with the ferrite rod,  the 4 reversed turns coils, and the antenna coil all acting as one thing.

There are many factors that will affect a XFRMRs performance: Primary/Secondary impedance ratio (impedance mismatch), K (coupling) factor , physical build parameters; ie wire gauges (skin effect), turns spacing, wire material, type/placement of insulation etc.  Tesla was unfortunately very vague with his writing on the subject, giving only an overview of concept.  Tesla made note that is is possible to -overdrive- the extra coil (under which conditions the extra-coil would NOT vibrate freely).

Playing the devil's advocate I have attached a commentary written by Richard Hull from his 1999 book;  It is interesting as R. Hull and his group from Virginia were (along with the Corum brothers)  some of the original pioneers of the renaissance of Tesla's 3-coil system (they actually built the monsters). The 3-coil system is the Actual real-deal Tesla coil that was developed and run at Colorado Springs in 1899. Not to side track the thread anymore......

I am sure you will see some of the contradictions in the explication given from R. Hull and the supposed M.O. of the Ruslan/Akula configuration pertaining to the Kacher/antenna. I offer this information as further food for thought.............

I have attached excerpts from July 26 C.S.N. written by R. Hull as they pertain to his interpretation of Tesla's work on that date.

I have also attached the entire R. Hull book along with C.S.N. notes by Tesla for anyone wanted more information.  It's a long read, but makes you think bit and well worth it.

take care, peace
lost_bro

EDIT, I could not attach the two pdf book formats, too large, sorry.

[lost_bro]

Yes it is correct and widely used in electronic engineering.

@Jeg
I agree with Void's comments about coupling two Tesla coils.

Regardless whether they are coupled electrically or magnetically, their frequency response will depend on the amount of coupling.  Read this for more on this subject.

Good day Verpies

Yes,  just a quick visual on that idea............Frequency/SideBand splitting.  As the coupling becomes tighter, the frequency splitting progressively become more severe.  Sounds like were re-inventing AM, ie; double side band full carrier wave.

take care, peace
lost_bro