Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[Void]

If it emits radiant then it shouldn't.
I just wanted to make a point on this, as many people are confused between radiant and RF emission.

Hi Jeg. I have done some experimenting with using shielding as a Faraday cage, and such shielding can certainly
reduce emissions, but it does not always completely block all emissions of EM emissions at various frequencies.
Also, if there are any wires that extend outside of the shielding from the device/component you are trying to shield, it can increase
radiation. By the way, I have already explained how Tesla himself used the term 'radiant energy' in his patent applications.
Others such as Lindemann and Bedini and some others have claimed Tesla claimed various other things about 'radiant energy' but these
people did not provide direct references to where Tesla ever said such things, from what I have seen. There are a lot of claims made
about Tesla in this regard going around on the net, but a lot of these claims about Tesla are never backed up with direct references to Tesla's own words.
There are also a lot of people using terms such as 'RF' and 'radiant energy', etc.  without really understanding what these terms
mean. This leads to a lot of misinformation being posted on the net about such things.

Tesla also mentioned that radiant has different properties, depending on the frequency. 
Such as the wide white flares or streamers that he could obtain.

Sigh...

What a good timing, I just was speaking with GeoFusion about scalar stuff!...
The difference between RF/standing/scalar is the geometric presentation of the wave. Scalar is having mostly vortex nature and the RF is just the pulsing.

No, I think what you mean to say is the EM waves are transverse waves and scalar waves
are longitudinal waves. The term 'RF' is not an indicator of a type of wave. RF is an indicator
of a frequency range only. Of course 'RF' would typically refer to EM radiations however.

RF and Scalar waves are very different from common RF Waves that most people work .
I try to show that and even that now one see  that wood box i used have  plates of zinc inside , and a particular mesh to Block RF signals until several gigahertz . http://www.slt.co/products/RFShieldingMesh/RFShieldingMesh.aspx

Scalar waves are capable of penetrating any solid object like walls , wood and even Faraday Cages. we can put a transmitter in a box of thick metal or wood and a receiver outside of that box will receive the scalar wave frequency you are pulsing or the oposite . The potential here is for a transmitter that can penetrate any obstacle . They are capable of transmitting power. 
A scalar transmitter can wirelessly send power to a receiver through any obstacle. If we put it in a Faraday Cage or a metal box, a receiver can receive power far away.During this process of transmission and reception could be magnified the  power on receiver.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0ByZY5hj0h0hXSlFjYWtXcGMweDg/view?usp=sharing

About healthy problems Tomtech29 have right and if someone want make a test, just buy a Geiger counter and measure near the karcher circuit  and maybe what will find is not so good may the find some several u/sievert  .
But most only want see GOLD and forget the most important things like what happen  in background ......
But well  people are able to decide what is better to each one .

Scalar waves are certainly a possibility. Dr. Konstantin Meyl and others have written about it.
Wood doesn't typically block EM emissions much at all. In my experience metal shielding does not necessarily
at all completely block EM emissions of strong EM radiations. It may do so under the right conditions however.

Corona discharge and sparks can certainly emit radiant energy in the sense that Tesla himself used that term.
Corona discharges and sparks can emit ultraviolet light as well as low level X-rays, and probably other higher
frequency EM radiations as well such as low level Gamma radiation, etc. If there is no corona discharge around a
HV coil or wire, then there will probably be little to no radiant energy emission from that coil.

I have previously explained how Tesla used the term radiant energy. It really appears that Tesla meant something different
in his use of the term 'radiant energy' than longitudinal waves. Radiant energy and longitudinal waves (AKA scalar waves) appear
to be two very different concepts. Not that I think my pointing this out will stop too many people from continuing to spread
false information about such things.

I personally think the idea of investigating longitudinal waves and its properties as outlined by Meyl and others is a worthy
thing to look into.  People should be careful about confusing this concept with Tesla's concept of radiant energy however, as they
really do appear to be two different things, unless a person can show that ultraviolet light and X-rays, etc. are longitudinal waves,
but they have been shown to be EM radiation, i.e., transverse waves, not longitudinal waves.

I won't dwell on any of this further, as it has become clear to me that even though a person can point out various
common errors that people are making about such things, it seems to make little difference. Many of
these people will continue to spread false information about such things even when it has been explained to
them where they are making their errors.  Flyback spikes become 'BEMF', and radiant energy becomes scalar waves, etc., etc.
As we have said, such is life.

[verpies]

When you guys mention the term "scalar", do you also mean a wave that moves longitudinally like a sound wave?

I do not pretend to know what others mean but the word "scalar" refers to possessing only one property - that of scale or magnitude, ...such as temperature or luminosity.
Specifically a scalar does not posses the property of direction, unlike a vector which has an inherent direction.

The word "scalar" is often conflated with the word "pseudoscalar" which denotes indiscerniblility of preferred direction, such as atmospheric pressure which exerts forces in all available directions equally (in other words: without a preferred direction).

A "pseudoscalar" is a term taken from the field of mathematics known as Geometric Algebra which is described there right beside vectors, bivectors and multivectors.

A "scalar wave" would not have any directional properties. If a "scalar wave" was propagating in all available directions (equally!), then propertly it should be called a "pseudoscalar wave".

[nelsonrochaa]

Scalar waves are certainly a possibility. Dr. Konstantin Meyl and others have written about it.
Wood doesn't typically block EM emissions much at all. In my experience metal shielding does not necessarily
at all completely block EM emissions of strong EM radiations. It may do so under the right conditions however.

Void,

That box is not only wood , inside have plates of zinc in all box , and after have another layer that have the mesh shield that i already provide in link the manufacturer information .  and don't have any wire connection are only sit down in a table .
What i could say ... the input used in circuit  are half of watt , so is supposed be a high "EM"  ? No because with a gauss meter i able to see that is not strong . 

I disagree  with talk you say:
without no corona discharge around a HV coil or wire, then there will probably be little to no radiant energy emission from that coil. What i tell you is based in measurements with a Geiger counter that could show the presence of high amounts of radiations like that you indicate .
I able to measure 245 u/sivert  with is more than substantial to reflect a bit .

Is important retain that are much to understand about some subjects , and without some workbench , read, and  and the right tools is more difficulty to form a opinion about subjects that normal are not discussed in the common lines .


Thanks

[Void]

Hi Verpies. Dr. Meyl has offered the following explanation for the origin of the term 'scalar wave'.
I am not certain who first coined the term 'scalar wave', although I believe I read something about that once
and I may have saved a reference to it somewhere. (At least I think this quote is from Meyl, I would have to check that.)
"What Are Scalar Waves?
What is a "scalar wave" exactly? Scalar wave (hereafter SW) is just another name for a "longitudinal" wave.
The term "scalar" is sometimes used instead because the hypothetical source of these waves is thought to be a "scalar field"
of some kind similar to the Higgs Field for example."
https://jmag0904.wordpress.com/2013/05/25/what-are-scalar-waves/

So it seems that the 'scalar' part of the term used in 'scalar wave' is actually in reference to the possible source
of the waves rather than an indication of a property of the wave itself.

[AlienGrey]

scalar waves are pressure waves, audio waves, if push you it' a punch or push, rf is a magnetic electron charged in a wave (it wastes time making a magnetic wave). radiant does not have the magnetic wave, it's statically charged partials.