Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 133 Guests are viewing this topic.

lost_bro

Quote from: lost_bro on April 28, 2016, 03:13:43 PM
Hello Verpies

Yes, I did not think it was D2 that *clamped* the flyback spike on the *FET* (IGBT).  D2 must meet the DSRD criterion ( diode capacitance charging/discharging)  Shouldn't that be D1 (fast recovery diode) which clamps (re-routes) the flyback spike?
How much capacitance would be considered *sufficient* to demonstrate the DSRD effect?  The C4D20120 SiC has Ir=65uA @ Vr =1200V  & 175C and Qctotal=130nC @ Vr=800V.
Has anyone ever tried a SiC diode (as D2) in a DSRD setup just for shits & grins?
Maybe something new to try ;D
take care, peace
lost_bro

Hello All

" The quarter period of the L-C circuit must be shorter
than the diode recovery time for fast current turn-off. A
diode fully saturated with charges will have a delay to
turn-off given by the recovery time presented in the data
sheets and the actual turn-off time will be approximately a
third of this delay. Thus, the diode should not be
saturated, as the pulse width then will be unacceptably
long. "

Just answered my own question...... :)

take care, peace
lost_bro

lost_bro

Quote from: itsu on April 28, 2016, 03:32:34 PM
Lost, 

i think the reflected nano-pulse will be "seen" and being taken care of firstly by the D2 (KD226D) diode.
This is a 800V diode, so i could put 2 in series to handle that pulse, not sure what 2 dsrd diodes in series does to the nano-pulse itself.

Itsu

Good day Itsu

Found this is the above attachment in my last post:

"Higher amplitude can be generated by using series
connected diode
s. However, the saturable transformer
must be retuned for higher input voltages, as the time to
saturation is voltage dependent. This is not a trivial
matter, proper choice must be made between increased
number of turns or increasing the core area; none of
which can be made in a continuous manner. "

Looks promising for higher voltage swing at output.

and:

"The pulser has been tested at repetition rates up to 100
kH
z with resistive charging, higher repetition rates can be
achieved with resonant charging methods
at the cost of
increased complexity, especially in the area of optimizing
core reset. Ultimately the repetition rate is limited to
5 MHz by the duration of the charge transfer sequence."

So just maybe it is possible to reach higher pulse frequencies with *resonant charging methods*.

take care, peace
lost_bro

MenofFather

Quote from: Void on April 28, 2016, 05:57:11 AM
Daly stated on his blog that the end of the 50 ohm coax was shorted (at least that's how Google Translate translates it):

"Далее обмотка коаксиалом 50 ом (ранее применялся в компьютерных сетях) получается бифиляр - конец обмотки закорочен - нагружен на генератор наносекундных импульсов."
Google Translation:
"Next, the winding 50 ohm coax (previously used in computer networks) obtained bifilar - end shorted winding - loaded to the generator of nanosecond pulses."

From:  http://www.liveinternet.ru/users/edward_lee/post235233940/
Yes, here corect translation. End is shorted. Dally also mentioning in video, that end of coaxial is shorted.

MenofFather

Quote from: NickZ on April 28, 2016, 10:12:51 AM

   
   I'm still having problems finding a transistor that will oscillate now (burnt my last good one), when making an Exciter/Kacher circuit.  I tried a fet, also, same thing, won't oscillate. Anyway, I'm taking a small 15inch Tv apart today, to see if I can scrounge some parts from it.
  I'd like to make a strong Exciter circuit but one that won't overheat the transistor. Ha!  As I'm always having the Kacher transistors getting way tooooo hot. And I don't want to use a fan, so, I'm thinking about Exciter circuits, like Nelsons, but maybe taking the idea and modifying it in my own way. I wouldn't want to just copy it...  As I can't, in any case.
   So, I'm still on the hunt for wild turkeys....  And, I haven't seen any down here, yet.
 

Use bigger radiator for kacher. Put on other radiator kacher radiator, if you not have one big radiator. Then heat you can save more you transistor.

d3x0r

@itsu if this continues very far, should start another thread.. BUT.


You have a sweet peek power there.  Isn't that what Tesla wanted?  A ultra short impulse? 
So, just for grins, one could at 15khz put a tesla primary to the impulse generator? and run it at low hertz... wasn't it very low frequencies tesla said he saw aura around coil?  (Not bright sparks, but more ambient... aura)
secondary should be highly insulated??  At 1.5kv input you're already going to be sparking if it was a 1:1 ratio?


(UWB radio?)


edit: Don't measure it... to see if you have a voltage drop of 1.5Kv, just trust that you did, and it's very low resistance seconary.. might ground the low side though...


also someone was making alternate dimension for everything basing all units in basic space-time units (m, s) such as E=IR and R is  1/t.... but come to think of it his units didn't work... maybe it is T-1 ?  anyway it causes a delay of current in a way so it backs up against a barrier and can be measured as voltage... should really just measure the current instead of voltage across resistor which I remembered just now you can also do.