Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[NickZ]

  Hoppy:
   I'm not trying to reduce any output on the push-pull, it's working ok, it's just the amount of voltage and current now going through my full bridge which is connected to the 28t coil, that leads to the Kacher's input. Now the Kacher's input can get too high, and is burning up some components on the Kacher circuit. I need to control the input to the Kacher, but not by dropping the push-pull's output.

   What I've seen in most all the homemade push pull TL494 controller boards, is that the output at the bulbs is reduced and limited to about 120w, or so.  From the 24v, 5A, draw from a PS or batteries, such as what Geo is showing. 
   
   I don't know what my induction circuits is drawing, as the idea is to make it self run, regardless, even without limiting controllers.
   The Mazilli is running without controller restrictions, and with no heat build up on the circuit components. 
   Later, I'll see if a TL494 board to fet driver type circuit really works any better. After new years, or so. 
So far, that has not been the case with our members, here, as they are all showing low outputs, low lumin levels, and no OU. Besides unstable operations, caused by possible HV interference, and not one self running, as yet.

[NickZ]

   Hoppy:
   Yes, proper choke levels, are what I'm looking into. So far I've replaced two different chokes (of the one board chokes) to a bigger toroid choke with thicker wire coils turns. Which did help to control the previous overheating of that choke. Now the Kacher's 25v 1000uf cap blew it's top, though, and will need replacing. Still too high a voltage going to the Kacher circuit, it can handle 24v, not much higher.
I also have another 3/4 inch yellow choke with 8 turns on, after the full bridge rectifier capacitor, which is going to the Kacher.  Need a bigger choke?  I also placed another 1 inch choke at the Kacher input, with 12t on it.  But, I've removed it, afterwards.
Maybe I need to put it back.  At one point I was obtaining 1 inch streamers at the antenna coil... which further did some damage to the grenade coils next to it.  So, I need to tone it down a bit...

[NickZ]

Without PWM control and pulse timing it is enough to place 1 additional transistor on base of the katcher transistor then output of it goes to the ground. When this transistor will be turned on the katcher will stop. This is what was seen in Andrian's katcher circuit with extra transistor in middle of PCB.

   T:  Adrian's Kacher is showing no signs of having PWM controller and pulse timing. So, how is he doing it with just a transistor?
Or is he?   Is there any schematic or diagram of his set up showing his Kacher circuit posted yet?

   Does anyone have the photos of Adrian's system?  I saw some very clear pictures of his system posted here a while back and I'd be interested in downloading them, if possible.

[Hoppy]

   Hoppy:
   Yes, proper choke levels, are what I'm looking into. So far I've replaced two different chokes (of the one board chokes) to a bigger toroid choke with thicker wire coils turns. Which did help to control the previous overheating of that choke. Now the Kacher's 25v 1000uf cap blew it's top, though, and will need replacing. Still too high a voltage going to the Kacher circuit, it can handle 24v, not much higher.
I also have another 3/4 inch yellow choke with 8 turns on, after the full bridge rectifier capacitor, which is going to the Kacher.  Need a bigger choke?  I also placed another 1 inch choke at the Kacher input, with 12t on it.  But, I've removed it, afterwards.
Maybe I need to put it back.  At one point I was obtaining 1 inch streamers at the antenna coil... which further did some damage to the grenade coils next to it.  So, I need to tone it down a bit...

Its the two halves of the choke in the Kacher circuit, not the push-pull that conico and I are referring to. Your Kacher' cap needs to have a much higher voltage rating. Its the current that's causing your transistor to get hot. This is where the chokes help to limit the peak currents.

[stivep]

question to Wesley:

"I make a note that you never answer my key question about why these ex-USSR replication do require earth-wire connection to obtain the effect, why they do not 3rd party witness test running say 500W during 6 hours non-stop and why they do not inside Faraday cage" the answer is counterpoise.:

Good point.
My theory was never finished to the point of consistent leading  concept. 1/4 wavelength  needs  counterpoise.
Body of car antenna is a balance -counterpoise to that antenna.  if you want to radiate you need to resonate at first.
That would make sense when talking about  electromagnetic wave RF. 
Nature needs balance. electron has mass. Mass in motion can  have inertia. Inertia can only exist if there is not constant acceleration but e.g: it is stimulating impulse from nanosecond generator that allows that inertia to be present.



So electrostatic pump  is the pump where major  attraction to the ground electrons is  done by electrostatic high voltage potential.
The stimulating impulses are delivered from nanosecond generator
The accumulation of initializing force energy is done by  electron motion ,
The initializing force  comes from our battery  in that first second  interval of time.


Similar to 15 girls pushing car till the point  where that car in motion  needs only one girl and than one finger of   that girl to compensate he losses
the load( light-bulbs) are  connected to secondary winding of a transformer  where first winding of that transformer is connected between ground and nanosecond generator impulses HV output.
That transformer is our resonance circuit ( series resonance LRC circuit )- lets call it RLC
However  because the secondary winding of that transformer is coupled to that   primary LRC circuit in ^{Near Field}
by  ferrite core  than whatever the change is present in that secondary winding  it impacts back by BEMF  the stability of   RLC circuit.

In a simple language flickering of the lightbulbs  due to instability is caused by changes of LRC  in that circuit during  given time frame .




So the key for TARIEL KAPANADZE , Ruslan Akula  Adrian Guska was to use tungsten based incandescent light bulbs as a load.- as  such load parameters  changes only at first  milliseconds when load is getting hot. 
In most of the cases the battery is still connected to the device and experimenter has full control over changing parameters of resistive R component of secondary winding resonance circuit   parameters.

That was only not so clear . with latest  device. made by Adrian Guska
By that we may think of the reason why Guska decided to  screw in lighbulbs  only after he started  the device.
Interesting  is that Adrian Guska had a problem with stability, when the last lighbulb was connected..
That conforms the fact that  system has reactive  character. To much of  R  in RLC circuit changes circuit parameters..

Russians do not test it inside Faraday cage"  because they are Russians  they do not have Faraday
Cage.
Also there is no way on you tube to present the device for 6 hours.
Interesting is that Akula and Ruslan refused my offer to visit them and conform that their devices work as desired
Adrian Guska told us that so far he has to much problem with SBU. But I spoke to him only few days ago.

Wesley