Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 290 Guests are viewing this topic.

GeoFusion

Hi Guyz :)

A happy new year for all.
Something for the view here
A load test on the new setup

I must say that I'm quite happy with results :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHLJicaPSaI&t

Cheerz~

Hoppy

Quote from: endlessoceans on December 31, 2016, 05:53:49 PM
Hi Jeg

I started years ago with the Joule thief (like most experimenters here) and then continued to build off that.  In the end the result was an oscillator that I have never seen similar anywhere online.  I know for certainty that I am on the right path and that is as close to 100% as you will ever see.  I have run tests with caps rather than batteries to remove all battery chemistry variables.  I can take 24v in one capacitor and fill another with no loss.  The circuit is a real bitter mistress though and for years I had terrible tuning problems until I figured things out.

In development you have to make sure there is NO HEAT anywhere.  Not on the switching transistor or in the battery/cap and wiring.  NO...there is no magical cold current but I know where all this misinformation comes from.  The best devices I have seen out there are CONVERSION devices (like the TPU).  They are NOT OU.  Its amazing how much energy is in a battery that LOOKS like OU when you run a system close to COP 1. 

Jeg there is just so much Nonsense on this forum that I have only watched for years.  People like TinselKoala are CORRECT.  There is NO OVERUNITY.  What there is though is abundant FREE ENERGY around us.  By building a Oscillator that runs at COP 1 you can then use the source battery for incredibly long run times OR you can put up an antenna and easily draw about 100 watts between earth and sky.  NO this is not powerline energy.  I have conducted experiments in the outback miles from nowhere and you cant pull that much from radio transmissions either.

One thing I want to save people from wasting time here in is much of the Tesla quotes nonsense.  Tesla DID NOT have overunity.  People here that imply that or misquote him are LIARS.  Tesla used Grid power like everyone else.  Tesla was all about transmission of energy in a very efficient way.  YES he did harness 'cosmic' energy to run a little motor just as I have done from a antenna and he spoke of " ONE DAY future generations will use it" (perhaps).....but did he drive his pierce arrow around on it....NO NO NO.  Pierce Arrow was proof of principle for his Wardencliff wireless project.

With COP close to 1 you can charge batteries with incredible speed and make them last a long time.  (which is what bedini did)  Sad to say....BEDINI IS AND WAS A LIAR.  Him and all his cronies like Lindemann and Bearden, Murakami have never seen Overunity or men in black.  They sell books and vidoes and battery chargers.  I have nothing against people trying to make a dollar by selling things but what I DO have issue with is LIARS and misinfo because it wastes the time of genuine researchers. 

If you want to really see some amazing things, ignore all the wives tales on this forum and go to the bench.  Build build build.

I may release some things in due course

Excellent post EO. I look forward to seeing some more from you.

Happy New Year to all.

Jeg

Quote from: endlessoceans on December 31, 2016, 06:09:02 PM
Regarding your question about the thick wire.

All the principles of how this operates are set out in text books.  You will require thick wire AND thin wire.  Each serves their purpose. 

Indeed great posts ocean! But even greater, is when someone once a while offers a direction to research for.
Mac farland Cook used thin and thick wire combinations for his oscillators. I recently used thin and thick wires combination for increasing the interaction between two discharging coils. But regarding oscillators, I know how difficult it is to synchronize your coils correctly. I attach a video which was my starter to this oscillating wonderful world. I hope we will read more for your research soon. Keep it up and many thanks.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XinprHC4sw       

AlienGrey

So ocean is saying you can't get more out than with a man made device than in, ''RUBBISH''! for a start Nelson has already proved that you can and has made a profesin of the skill, and Tesla also said an iron crore based device is the path to look at, if your too lazy to experiment and just pick flies then you have no experience in what your talking about on on advising others and any one following that advice could be missing an opportunity!  I rest my case.  Dude!  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

jbignes5

Quote from: endlessoceans on December 31, 2016, 05:53:49 PM
Hi Jeg

I started years ago with the Joule thief (like most experimenters here) and then continued to build off that.  In the end the result was an oscillator that I have never seen similar anywhere online.  I know for certainty that I am on the right path and that is as close to 100% as you will ever see.  I have run tests with caps rather than batteries to remove all battery chemistry variables.  I can take 24v in one capacitor and fill another with no loss.  The circuit is a real bitter mistress though and for years I had terrible tuning problems until I figured things out.

In development you have to make sure there is NO HEAT anywhere.  Not on the switching transistor or in the battery/cap and wiring.  NO...there is no magical cold current but I know where all this misinformation comes from.  The best devices I have seen out there are CONVERSION devices (like the TPU).  They are NOT OU.  Its amazing how much energy is in a battery that LOOKS like OU when you run a system close to COP 1. 

Jeg there is just so much Nonsense on this forum that I have only watched for years.  People like TinselKoala are CORRECT.  There is NO OVERUNITY.  What there is though is abundant FREE ENERGY around us.  By building a Oscillator that runs at COP 1 you can then use the source battery for incredibly long run times OR you can put up an antenna and easily draw about 100 watts between earth and sky.  NO this is not powerline energy.  I have conducted experiments in the outback miles from nowhere and you cant pull that much from radio transmissions either.

One thing I want to save people from wasting time here in is much of the Tesla quotes nonsense.  Tesla DID NOT have overunity.  People here that imply that or misquote him are LIARS.  Tesla used Grid power like everyone else.  Tesla was all about transmission of energy in a very efficient way.  YES he did harness 'cosmic' energy to run a little motor just as I have done from a antenna and he spoke of " ONE DAY future generations will use it" (perhaps).....but did he drive his pierce arrow around on it....NO NO NO.  Pierce Arrow was proof of principle for his Wardencliff wireless project.

With COP close to 1 you can charge batteries with incredible speed and make them last a long time.  (which is what bedini did)  Sad to say....BEDINI IS AND WAS A LIAR.  Him and all his cronies like Lindemann and Bearden, Murakami have never seen Overunity or men in black.  They sell books and vidoes and battery chargers.  I have nothing against people trying to make a dollar by selling things but what I DO have issue with is LIARS and misinfo because it wastes the time of genuine researchers. 

If you want to really see some amazing things, ignore all the wives tales on this forum and go to the bench.  Build build build.

I may release some things in due course

Imagine, he suggested, an enclosed cylinder with a small hole in it near the bottom. Let us say that this cylinder, he added, contains very little energy but that it is placed in an environment that has a lot of energy. In this case, energy would flow from the outside environment, the high energy source, through the small opening at the bottom of the cylinder, and into the cylinder where there is less energy. Also suppose that as the energy passing into the cylinder is converted into another form of energy as, for example, heat is converted into mechanical energy in a steam engine. If it were possible to artificially produce such a "sink" for the energy of the ambient medium then "we should be enabled to get at any point of the globe a continuous supply of energy, day and night(8)." He continued, in the article, to elaborate on his energy pump but changed the image slightly. On the surface of the earth we are at a high energy level and can imagine ourselves at the bottom of a lake with the water surrounding us equal to the energy in the surrounding medium. If a "sink" for the energy is to be created in the cylinder, it is necessary to replace the water that would flow into the tank with something much lighter than water. This could be done by pumping the water out of the cylinder, but when the water flowed back in, we would only be able to perform the same amount of work with the inflowing water as we did when it was first pumped out. "Consequently nothing would be gained in this double operation of first raising the water and then letting it fall down." Energy, though, can be converted into different forms as it passes from a higher to a lower state. He said, "assume that the water, in its passage into the tank, is converted into something else, which may be taken out of it without using any, or by using very little power(9)." For example, if the energy of the ambient medium is taken to be the water, oxygen and hydrogen making up the water are the other forms of energy into which it could change as it entered the cylinder. Corresponding to this ideal case, all the water flowing into the tank would be decomposed into oxygen and hydrogen ...and the result would be that the water would continually flow in, and yet the tank would remain entirely empty, the gases formed escaping. We would thus produce, by expending initially a certain amount of work to create a sink for...the water to flow in, a condition enabling us to get any amount of energy without further effort(10). Tesla recognized that no energy conversion system would be perfect, some water would always get into the tank, but "there will be less to pump out than flows in, or, in other words, less energy will be needed to maintain the initial condition than is developed [by the incoming water], and this is to say that some energy will be gained from the medium(11)." He found that this pumping could be done with a piston "not connected to anything else, but was perfectly free to vibrate at an enormous rate(12)." This he was able to do with his "mechanical oscillator," a steam-driven engine used for producing high frequency currents. The faster the pump would work, the more efficient it would be at extracting energy from the cosmos. Research along this line culminated in the oscillator demonstrated at the Chicago World's Fair in 1893. It was not until much later, in the 1900 article, he revealed: "On that occasion I exposed the principles of the mechanical oscillator, but the original purpose of this machine is explained here for the first time(13)." It was also in 1893 that Tesla applied for a patent on an electrical coil that is the most likely candidate for a non-mechanical successor of his energy extractor. This is his "Coil for Electro-magnets," patent #512,340. It is another curious design because, unlike an ordinary coil made by turning wire on a tube form, this one uses two wires laid next to each other on a form but with the end of the first one connected to the beginning of the second one. In the patent Tesla explains that this double coil will store many times the energy of a conventional coil(14). Preliminary measurements of two helices of the same size and with the same number of turns, one with a single, the other with a bifilar winding, show differences in voltage gain(15). In figure 6, the upper curve is from the Tesla design, the lower was produced by the single wound coil. The patent, however, gives no hint of what might have been its more unusual capability. In the Century article Tesla compares extracting energy from the environment to the work of other scientists who were, at that time, learning to condense atmospheric gases into liquids. In particular he cited the work of a Dr. Karl Linde who had discovered what Tesla described as a "self-cooling" method for liquefying air. As Tesla said, "This was the only experimental proof which I was still wanting that energy was obtainable from the medium in the manner contemplated by me(16)." What ties the Linde work with Tesla's electromagnet coil is that both of them used a double path for the material they were working with. Linde had a compressor to pump the air to a high pressure, let the pressure fall as it traveled through a tube, and then used that cooled air to reduce the temperature of the incoming air by having it travel back up the first tube through a second tube enclosing the first(17). The already cooled air added to the cooling process of the machine and quickly condensed the gases to a liquid. Tesla's intent was to condense the energy trapped between the earth and its upper atmosphere and to turn it into an electric current. He pictured the sun as an immense ball of electricity, positively charged with a potential of some 200 billion volts. The earth, on the other hand, is charged with negative electricity. The tremendous electrical force between these two bodies constituted, at least in part, what he called cosmic energy. It varied from night to day and from season to season but it is always present.