Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[stivep]

thank you, I didn't even imagine that Alessandro Volta had something to do with it

Se l'elettroforo viene caricato ponendolo a contatto con una macchina elettrostatica, (+ sullo
Esperimenti di Volta con l'elettroforo
(da Scelt. Opuscoli, vol X, 1775)
scudo e – sull'armatura inferiore) e le armature vengono quindi cortocircuitate tra di loro, i segni elettrici cessano. Se a questo punto si solleva lo scudo tenendolo isolato, si trova su di esso una forte elettricità negativa, mentre la superficie del mastice viene trovata positiva. Secondo Volta, l'assenza di segni elettrici dopo la scarica risulta da un equilibrio tra l'elettricità positiva rimasta sul mastice e un'uguale elettricità negativa indotta sullo scudo. Alla separazione, non si ha quindi una rigenerazione ex novo dell'elettricità del mastice e dello scudo (l'elettricità vindice di Beccaria), ma una semplice manifestazione delle due elettricità contrarie ancora presenti e che ora non si possono più equilibrare.
Se lo scudo, una volta scaricato, viene di nuovo posato sul mastice, toccato dallo sperimentatore e sollevato, sempre tramite il manico isolante, su di esso si trova di nuovo una forte elettricità negativa. Ripetendo le stesse operazioni, lo scudo può continuare a fornire elettricità negativa per tempi lunghissimi, talvolta per mesi interi. Per questo motivo Volta, in una lettera del giugno 1775 a Priestley, suggerisce per il proprio apparecchio il nome di elettroforo perpetuo:
"Che se a voi non dispiacesse, ardirei pure imporre un nome al mio picciolo apparecchio, e sarebbe quello di Elettroforo perpetuo".
In questo modo, Volta introduce un generatore di elettricità funzionante secondo un principio diverso dallo strofinio, fino ad allora usato, e dà il via alla realizzazione di tutte le macchine elettriche a induzione.

If the electrophorus is charged by placing it in contact with an electrostatic machine, (+ on the Volta experiments with the electrophorus (from Scelt. Brochures, vol X, 1775) shield and - on the lower armature) and the armatures are then short-circuited to each other, the electrical signs cease. If at this point the shield is lifted keeping it isolated, there is a strong negative electricity on it, while the surface of the putty is found positive. According to Volta, the absence of electrical signs after the discharge results from a balance between the positive electricity left on the mastic and an equal negative electricity induced on the shield. On separation, there is therefore no new regeneration of the mastic and shield electricity (Beccaria's vindice electricity), but a simple manifestation of the two opposite electricity still present and which can no longer be balanced. If the shield, once discharged, is again placed on the mastic, touched by the experimenter and lifted, again through the insulating handle, on it is again a strong negative electricity. By repeating the same operations, the shield can continue to supply negative electricity for very long times, sometimes for whole months. For this reason Volta, in a letter dated June 1775 to Priestley, suggests for his own device the name of perpetual electrophorus: "That if you do not mind, I would dare to impose a name on my little apparatus, and it would be that of Perpetual Electrophorus". In this way, Volta introduces a functioning electricity generator according to a different principle from the rubbing, until then used, and starts the realization of all the electric induction machines.

Wesley's  comment: The controversy  about " perpetual" in regards to  Electrophorus is explained   in  last  few posts

Again  I repeat the two links from above:

OK I HAVE IT
https://youtu.be/GAtAG938AQc?t=2254

or  for these of you who can not wait  look here :
https://youtu.be/GAtAG938AQc?t=2381

Wesley

[T-1000]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAtAG938AQc this one is not so  clear I will try to find some more.

In begining of that lecture professor talks about charging of capacitor inside of electric field.
For going further, take this situation and apply same charge to air capacitror in area of ionized air. Then due laws of electrostatic attraction observe charge increase in capacitor to more than usual due particles polarization.
And then for going further this can be done with Tesla coil operating on disruptive charge/discharge of surrounding area which cause air ionization and particles inertion going towards capacitor we charge.
Then the electric field strength potential formula inside of capacitor (which is written on the board) does not apply anymore as we just connect open circuit.
At this point only experimenation can show how physics can deal with energy calculations....

P.S> That video is missing demo part where capacitor is going to be charged in external electric field. So the ending part have no much use except demonstration where charge is being kept in the capacitor.

Cheers!

[stivep]

In beginning of that lecture professor talks about charging of capacitor inside of electric field.
For going further, take this situation and apply same charge to air capacitor in area of ionized air. Then due laws of electrostatic attraction observe charge increase in capacitor to more than usual due particles polarization.
Then the electric field strength potential inside of capacitor formula which is written on the board does not apply anymore as we just connect open circuit.
And then for going further this can be done with Tesla coil operating on disruptive charge/discharge of surrounding area which cause air ionization and particles insertion going towards capacitor we charge.
At this point only experimentation can show how physics can deal with energy calculations....

P.S> That video is missing demo part where capacitor is going to be charged in external electric field. So the ending part have no much use except demonstration where charge is being kept in the capacitor.

Cheers!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rVdEhyMR6A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rVdEhyMR6A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAtAG938AQc

https://books.google.com/books?id=dhYGCAAAQBAJ&pg=PA439&lpg=PA439&dq=tektronix+113&source=bl&ots=uDo33BxhbB&sig=EA1pHJt5C-JU_p21tNWs2WCphc0&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjvi6yq_bnZAhXizVkKHQdBDicQ6AEISTAG#v=onepage&q=tektronix%20113&f=false
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Mt4BLwEcQA


and some bonus for your curiosity showing what electric field can do :
https://www.reddit.com/r/Physics/comments/7xhcu1/this_remarkable_photo_shows_a_single_atom_trapped/
Please note that  atom is to small to be seen but read note of Dr Roy on the picture


Please review this material and  give me your comment
Wesley

[AlienGrey]

Apcore all i can see is the cap is a paper of film cap with the outside covered in alloy baco foil with the side ends open to the axial connection wires.
the two ends go out to the coil feed through a diode. The case is of a metallic tin plate with ally duct tape sealing the sides and one side of the cap
connected to cap.

Note the site holder is a bit aggressive on photo capture or discussion on his design ! I think  he wants some E300 for the CD  it's a joke got to be

|Hope that helps

[Sergh]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rVdEhyMR6A

This is a good example of generating electricity from air. Good, but useless.


Otherwise it would be if it were possible to ionize the air at a very low voltage.
For example, to achieve strong ionization at a voltage of 100 - 200 V, not higher. Better at 10 - 20 V, if possible.
Under normal conditions, this can not happen. Normal, not nano-, needle electrodes will not help.

It is necessary to use something else. Options:
1. Combine ionization with evaporation.
2. Use chemical ionization.
3. Consider the possibility of low-energy radiation.
Beta-radiation with energy below 10 kV is not registered almost anything  from simple devices.
But such radiation is much in nature.

To control ionization, simple devices like this can be used.
If you do enough sensitive - you will find many interesting places in your home.
Visually the device works the same way as the "PKE Meter" in the movie "Ghostbusters"

It can find ionization for no apparent reason in the middle of an empty room.